The need for a non-modular, data-driven approach to multilingual grammar: Diasystematic Construction Grammar at work

Boas, Hans C.; Höder, Steffen

doi:10.1075/cal.40.02boa

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2007). Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–66). Oxford University Press.

Anthonissen, L. (2020). Cognition in Construction Grammar. Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 309–337.

Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2015). Reexamining Icelandic as a heritage language in North America. In J. B. Johannessen, & J. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America. Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 72–93). Benjamins.

Arnbjörnsdóttir, B., & Þráinsson, H. (2018). Hvað einkennir vesturíslensku? Yfirlit um fyrri rit og rannsóknir. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir, H. Þráinsson, & Ú. Bragason (Eds.), Sigurtunga. Vesturíslenskt mál og menning (pp. 211–255). Háskólaútgáfan.

Auer, P. (1998). Dialect leveling and the standard varieties in Europe. Folia Linguistica, 32, 1–9.

Backus, A. (2020). Usage-based approaches. In E. Adamou, & Y. Matras (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language contact (pp. 110–126). Routledge.

Barking, M., Backus, A., & Mos, M. (2022). Similarity in language transfer. Investigating transfer of light verb constructions from Dutch to German. Journal of Language Contact, 15, 198–239.

Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Ed.) (2000). Usage-based models of language. CSLI Publications.

Bayley, R., Cameron, R., & Lucas, C. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129.

Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–188.

Blevins, M. (2018). Towards a constructional analysis of the progressive aspect in Texas German. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 73–114). Benjamins.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Holt.

Boas, H. C. (2003). A constructional approach to resultatives. CSLI Publications.

(2006). From the field to the web: implementing best-practice recommendations in documentary linguistics. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40, 153–174.

(2009a). The life and death of Texas German. Duke University Press.

(2009b). Case loss in Texas German: The influence of semantic and pragmatic factors. In J. Barðdal, & S. Chelliah (Eds.), The Role of semantics and pragmatics in the development of case (pp. 347–373). Benjamins.

(Ed.) (2009c). Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography: Methods and applications. De Gruyter.

(2010). The syntax-lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar: A case study of English communication verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 24, 54–82.

(2011). Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In S. Engelberg, K. Proost, & A. Holler (Eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik (pp. 37–69). Mouton de Gruyter.

(2013). Cognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 233–252). Oxford University Press.

(2017). Computational resources: FrameNet and constructicon. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 549–573). Cambridge University Press.

(2019). Zur methodologischen Grundlage der empirischen Konstruktikographie. In D. Czicza, V. Dekalo, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik VI. Varianz in der konstruktionalen Schematizität (pp. 237–263). Stauffenburg.

(2020). A roadmap towards determining the universal status of semantic frames. In R. Enghels, B. Defrancq, & M. Jansegers (Eds.), New approaches to contrastive linguistics (pp. 21–52). De Gruyter.

(2021). Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics. In X. Wen, & R. J. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 43–77). Routledge.

(2025). Constructional syntax. In M. Fried, & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 44–70). Cambridge University Press.

Boas, H. C., & Dux, R. (2017). From the past into the present: From case frames to semantic frames. In Linguistics Vanguard, 2017, 1–14.

Boas, H. C., & Höder, S. (Eds.). (2018). Constructions in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages. Benjamins.

(Eds.) (2021). Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practice, and additional language acquisition. Benjamins.

Boas, H. C., Lyngfelt, B., & Torrent, T. T. (2019). Framing constructicography. Lexicographica, 35, 41–95.

Boas, H. C., & Pierce, M. (2011). Lexical developments in Texas German. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies on German language islands (pp. 129–150). Benjamins.

Boas, H. C., Pierce, M., Roesch, K., Halder, G., & Weilbacher, H. (2010). The Texas German Dialect Archive: a multimedia resource for research, teaching, and outreach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 22, 277–296.

Boogaart, R., Colleman, T., & Rutten, G. (2014). Constructions all the way everywhere: Four new directions in constructionist research. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar (pp. 1–14). De Gruyter Mouton.

Bot, K. de. (2019). Defining and assessing multilingualism. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 3–18). Wiley-Blackwell.

Bourgeois, S. (2021). ‘Ok, qui d’autre na, nobody on the line right now?’ A Diasystematic Construction Grammar approach to discourse markers in bilingual Cajun speech. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 55–80). Benjamins.

Brenzinger, M. (Ed.) (2007). Language diversity endangered. Mouton de Gruyter.

Bresnan, J. (1982). Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 343–434.

Bybee, J. (2012). Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In M. Tallerman, & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 528–536). Oxford University Press.

(2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.

Cappelle, B. (2017). What’s pragmatics doing outside constructions? In I. Depraetere, & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line (pp. 115–151). Springer.

(2024). Can construction grammar be proven wrong? Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. MIT Press.

(1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.

Clyne, M. (2003). Dynamics of language contact. Cambridge University Press.

Cook, V. & Li Wei (Eds.) (2016). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge University Press.

Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1057–1074.

Coupland, N. (Ed.) (2010). The handbook of language and globalization. Wiley-Blackwell.

Croft, W. (2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language (pp. 49–68). Benjamins.

(2005). Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 273–314). Benjamins.

(2009). Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans, & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395–420). Benjamins.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press.

Czulo, O., Ziem, A., & Torrent, T. T. (2020). Beyond lexical semantics: notes on pragmatic frames. In T. T. Torrent, C. F. Baker, O. Czulo, K. Ohara & M. R. L. Petruck (Eds.), Proceedings of the International FrameNet Workshop 2020: Towards a global, multilingual FrameNet. European Language Resources Association.

Dąbrowska, E. (2019). Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 3: Key topics (pp. 231–250). De Gruyter.

(2020). Language as a phenomenon of the third kind. Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 213–229.

DeGraff, M. (2001). Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language (pp. 53–121). MIT Press.

Del Maschio, N., & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Language organization in the bilingual and multilingual brain. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 199–213). Wiley-Blackwell.

De Pascale, S., Pijpops, D., Van de Velde, F., & Zenner, E. (2022). Reassembling the pimped ride: a quantitative look at the integration of a borrowed expression. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 777312.

De Smet, H. (2020). What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 251–278.

Díaz-Campos, M., & Balasch, S. (Eds.) (2023). The handbook of usage-based linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.

Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press.

(2023). The constructicon. Taxonomies and networks. Cambridge University Press.

Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Heuven, W. J. B. van (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518.

Dunn, J. (2017). Computational learning of construction grammars. Language & Cognition, 9, 254–292.

Dux, R. (2017). Classifying language contact phenomena: English verbs in Texas German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 29, 379–430.

(2018). Texas German and English word order constructions in contact. In H. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 211–249). Benjamins.

(2020). Code-switching and loan translation in German-American. A cognitive-constructional account. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 52–65.

Eliasson, S. (2013). Language ecology in the work of Einar Haugen. In W. Vandenbussche, D. H. Jahr & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language ecology for the 21st century. Linguistic conflicts and social environments (pp. 15–63). Novus.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, vol. 2 (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.

(1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 73–86). Linguistic Society of America.

(2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress (Barcelona, 15–19 July 2008) (pp. 49–68).

Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S. (2000). Describing polysemy: The case of ‘crawl’. In Y. Ravin, & C. Laecock (Eds.), Polysemy. Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 91–110). Oxford University Press.

Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. (2010). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 13–340). Oxford University Press.

Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16, 235–251.

Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhodes, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In H. C. Boas, & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 309–372). CSLI Publications.

Fischer, K. (2015). Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition, 7, 563–588.

Fishman, J. (Ed.) (2001). Can threatened languages be saved? Reversing language shift, revisited: A 21st century perspective. Multilingual Matters.

Freitas Junior, R. de, Soares, L. A. A., Nascimento, J. P. da S., & Silveira, V. L. V. da (2022). A gramática de construções diassistêmica: uma abordagem aquisicional baseada no uso. Revista de estudos da linguagem, 30, 606–634.

Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009). Code-switching. Cambridge University Press.

Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (2010). Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.

(2006). Constructions at work. Oxford University Press.

(2016). Partial productivity of linguistic constructions. Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption. Language and Cognition, 8, 1–22.

(2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.

Goll, S. (forthc.). Südschleswigdänisch. Eine strukturelle Bestandsaufnahme aus dialektologischer Perspektive. Universitätsverlag Kiel.

Grant, A. P. (2019). Contact-induced linguistic change. An introduction. In A. Grant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp. 1–50). Oxford University Press.

(2020). Contact and language convergence. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact, 2nd edn. (pp. 113–128). Wiley Blackwell.

Grey, C. G. (2019). English and Welsh in contact. In A. P. Grant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp. 350–373). Oxford University Press.

Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15.

(2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford University Press.

Guion, S. (1996). The death of Texas German in Gillespie County. In P. S. Ureland, & I. Clarkson (Eds.), Language contact across the North Atlantic (pp. 243–263). Niemeyer.

Günther, K. (2020). Die Caused-Motion-Konstruktion im deutsch-französischen bilingualen Spracherwerb: ein konstruktionsgrammatischer Ansatz. PhD dissertation, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Hagel, A. (2020). Strange sounds, familiar words. Interlingual decoding from a CxG perspective. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 122–134.

Hakimov, N., & Backus, A. (2021). Usage-based contact linguistics: Effects of frequency and similarity in language contact. Journal of Language Contact, 13, 459–481.

Haspelmath, M., & Tadmor, U. (2009). The Loanword Typology Project and the World Loanword Database. Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 1–34). De Gruyter.

Haugen, E. (1953). The Norwegian language in America. A study in bilingual behavior, vol. 2: The American dialects of Norwegian. University of Pennsylvania Press.

(1971). The ecology of language. The Linguistic Reporter, 13, 19–26.

Hell, J. G. van, & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780–789.

Hendrikx, I. (2019). The acquisition of intensifying constructions in Dutch and English by French-speaking CLIL and non-CLIL students: Cross-linguistic influence and exposure effects. PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.

Hesseling, D. C. (1899). Het Afrikaansch: bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der Nederlandsche taal in Zuid-Afrika. Brill.

(1905). Het Negerhollands der Deense Antillen: Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der Nederlandse taal in Amerika. Sijthoff.

Heuven, W. J. van, & Dijkstra, A. (2010). Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support for psycholinguistic models. Brain Research Reviews, 64, 104–122.

Heuven, W. van, Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.

Hilpert, M. (2019a). Construction Grammar and its application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh University Press.

(Ed.) (2019b). Higher-order schemas in morphology. Thematic issue, Word Structure 12(3).

Höder, S. (2012). Multilingual constructions: a diasystematic approach to common structures. In K. Braunmüller, & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies (pp. 241–257). Benjamins.

(2014a). Constructing diasystems. Grammatical organisation in bilingual groups. In T. A. Åfarli, & B. Mæhlum (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar (pp. 137–152). Benjamins.

(2014b). Phonological elements and Diasystematic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 6, 202–231.

(2018). Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 37–70). Benjamins.

(2019). Phonological schematicity in multilingual constructions: a diasystematic perspective on lexical form. Word Structure, 12, 334–352.

(2021). Grammatical arealisms across the Danish-German border from a constructional perspective. In C. Zimmer (Ed.), German(ic) in language contact. Grammatical and sociolinguistic dynamics (pp. 11–42). Language Science Press.

Höder, S., Prentice, J., & Tingsell, S. (2021). Additional language acquisition as emerging multilingualism. A Construction Grammar approach. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 310–337). Benjamins.

Hoffmann, T. (2020). What would it take for us to abandon Construction Grammar? Falsifiability, confirmation bias and the future of the constructionist enterprise. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 148–160.

(2022). Construction Grammar. The structure of English. Cambridge University Press.

Hymes, D. (Ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press.

Ibbotson, P. (2020). What it takes to talk. Exploring developmental cognitive linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton.

Israel, M. (1996). The way constructions grow. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). CSLI Publications.

Iwata, S. (2008). Locative alternation: A lexical-constructional approach. Benjamins.

Jach, D. (2021). Something I was dealing with. Preposition placement in multilingual constructicons. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 339–374). Benjamins.

Jake, J. L., & Myers-Scotton, C. (2020). The 4-M model. Different routes in production for different morphemes. In E. Adamou, & Y. Matras (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language contact (pp. 63–87). Routledge.

Järvinen, S., & Lyngfelt, B. (2024). Suomessa på grund av corona niillä on visiiri kaikilla. En konstruktionsgrammatisk analys av kodväxling mellan finska och svenska. In D. Jansson, I. Melander, G. Westberg, & D. Y. Falk (Eds.), Svenskans beskrivning. Förhandlingar vid trettioåttonde sammankomsten, Örebro 4–6 maj 2022 (vol. 1, pp. 272–289). Örebro universitet.

Johanson, L. (2002). Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In M. C. Jones, & E. Esch (Eds.), Language change. The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors (pp. 285–313). Mouton de Gruyter.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.

Jones, M. C. (2022). Contact between English and Norman in the Channel Islands. In S. S. Mufwene, & A. M. Escobar (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language contact, vol. 2: Multilingualism in population structure (pp. 635–654). Cambridge University Press.

Joseph, B. (2019). Historical linguistics in the 50 years since Weinreich, Labov, and Herzog (1968). In H. C. Boas, & M. Pierce (Eds.), New directions for historical linguistics (pp. 153–174). Brill.

Koch, N., & Günther, K. (2021). Transfer phenomena in bilingual language acquisition. The case of caused-motion constructions. Languages, 6, 25.

Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 377–394.

Labov, W. (1966). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics. Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964 (pp. 84–113). Mouton.

(2001a). Applying our knowledge of African American English to the problem of raising reading levels in inner-city schools. In S. J. Laneheart (Ed.), Sociocultural and Historical Contexts of African American English (pp. 299–317). Benjamins.

(2001b). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Blackwell.

(2011). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Blackwell.

(2019). What has been built on empirical foundations. In H. C. Boas, & M. Pierce (Eds.), New directions for historical linguistics (pp. 42–57). Brill.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195–208.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.

Leclercq, B., & Morin, C. (2023). No equivalence: A new principle of no synonymy. Constructions, 15.

Lee-Goldman, R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2018). The FrameNet constructicon in action. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography. Constructicon development across languages (pp. 19–40). Benjamins.

Lepic, R. (2021). From letters to families. Initialized signs in American Sign Language. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 267–305). Benjamins.

Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K., & Torrent, T. T. (Eds.) (2018). Constructicography. Constructicon development across languages. Benjamins.

Matras, Y. (2020). Language contact, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.

(2022). Structural outcomes of language contact. In S. S. Mufwene, & A. M. Escobar (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language contact, vol. 2: Multilingualism in population structure (pp. 593–617). Cambridge University Press.

McColm, D. (2019). A cross-linguistic investigation of the way-construction in English, Dutch, and German. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.

McWhorter, J. (2005). Defining creole. Oxford University Press.

Mott, B., & Laso, N. J. (2019). Semantic borrowing in language contact. In A. P. Grant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp. 155–172). Oxford University Press.

Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press.

Mühlhäusler, P. (1996). Linguistic ecology. Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific region. Routledge.

Muysken, P. (1981). Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In A. Highfield, & A. Valdman (Eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies (pp. 52–78). Karoma.

(2000). Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.

(2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 16, 709–730.

Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Dueling languages. Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Clarendon Press.

(2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford University Press.

(2006). Natural codeswitching knocks on the laboratory door. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 9, 203–212.

Myers-Scotton, C., & Jake, J. (2009). A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing and production. In B. E. Bullock, & A. J. Toribio (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 336–357). Cambridge University Press.

Namboodiripad, S. (2021). Non-Dravidian elements and (non)diasystematic change in Malayalam. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 191–232). Benjamins.

Odden, O. R. (2019). North Scandinavian type noun constructions. Patterns with slags, SORTs and TYP(E). PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.

Onysko, A. (2019). Reconceptualizing language contact phenomena as cognitive processes. In E. Zenner, A. Backus, & E. Winter-Froemel (Eds.), Cognitive contact linguistics (pp. 23–50). De Gruyter.

Pavlenko, A. (2023). Multilingualism and historical amnesia: an introduction. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Multilingualism and history (pp. 1–49). Cambridge University Press.

Petruck, M. R. L., Fillmore, C. J., Baker, C., Ellsworth, M., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2004). Reframing FrameNet data. In Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress, Lorient, France (pp. 405–416).

Pfaff, C. (1979). Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language, 55, 291–318.

Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.

Poplack, S., & Meechan, M. (1998). Introduction: How languages fit together in codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 127–138.

Poplack, S., Sankoff, G., & Miller, C. (1988). The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics, 26, 47–104.

Quick, A. E., & Verschik, A. (2021). Usage-based contact linguistics: An introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics Review, 12, 165–177.

Rabé, M. (2021). Kodewisseling in Afrikaans-Nederlandse kinders se spraak. Master’s thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom.

Rooy, B. van (2021). A Diasystematic Construction Grammar analysis of language change in the Afrikaans and English finite verb complement clause construction. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 109–137). Benjamins.

Rottet, K. J. (2021). Making one’s way in Welsh. Language contact and constructional change. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 233–265). Benjamins.

Ruppenhofer, J., Boas, H. C., & Baker, C. (2013). The FrameNet approach to relating syntax and semantics. In R. H. Gouws, U. Heid, W. Schweickard, & H. E. Wiegand (Eds.), Dictionaries. An international encyclopedia of lexicography (pp. 1329–1329). De Gruyter Mouton.

Ruppenhofer, J., Boas, H. C., & Baker, C. F. (2017). FrameNet. In P. A. Fuertes-Olivera (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of lexicography (pp. 383–398). Routledge.

Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. C., Johnson, C., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. [URL]

Sabino, R. (2018). Languaging without languages. Beyond metro-, multi-, poly-, pluri- and translanguaging. Brill.

Sakel, J. (2007). Types of loan: matter and pattern. In Y. Matras, & J. Sakel (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 15–29). Mouton de Gruyter.

Sankoff, G. (1980). The social life of language. University of Philadelphia Press.

(2019). Building on empirical foundations: Individual and community change in real time. In H. C. Boas, & M. Pierce (Eds.), New directions for historical linguistics (pp. 58–77). Brill.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press.

Schmidt, T. (2017). DGD — die Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 45, 451–163.

Schuchardt, H. (1884). Dem Herrn Franz von Miklosich zum 20. November 1883. Slawo-Deutsches und Slawo-Italienisches. Leuschner & Lubensky.

(1914). Die Sprache der Saramakkaneger in Surinam. Müller.

Shohamy, E. (Ed.) (2009). Language policy. Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.

Sigurðsson, H.Á. (2010). Mood in Icelandic. In B. Rothstein, & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp. 33–55). Benjamins.

Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Philipson, R. (2011). Language ecology. In J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Pragmatics in practice (pp. 177–198). Benjamins.

Smith, N. (2019). Mixed languages, younger languages, and contact-induced language change. In A. P. Grant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact (pp. 303–330). Oxford University Press.

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns. Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3 (pp. 36–149). Cambridge University Press.

(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.

Thomason, S. (2001). Language contact. An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

(2003). Contact as a source of language change. In B. Joseph, & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 687–712). Blackwell.

(2019). Historical linguistics since 1968: On some of the causes of linguistic change. In H. C. Boas, & M. Pierce (Eds.), New directions for historical linguistics (pp. 110–131). Brill.

Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Child language acquisition: A usage-based approach. Harvard University Press.

Traugott, E. C. (2019). Precursors of work on grammaticalization and constructionalization in Directions for Historical Linguistics. In H. C. Boas, & M. Pierce (Eds.), New directions for historical linguistics (pp. 132–152). Brill.

Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Blackwell.

(2011). Sociolinguistic typology. Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.

Urban, A. (2021). Idioconstructions in conflict. Ad hoc generalization in multilingual speech processing. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 17–53). Benjamins.

Van Coetsem, F. (1988). Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Foris.

Van Goethem, K., & Hendrikx, I. (2021). Intensifying constructions in second language acquisition. A diasystematic-constructionist approach. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2. Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 375–428). Benjamins.

Weinreich, M. (1945). Der yivo un di problemen fun undzer tsayt. Yivo bleter, 25, 3–18.

Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Mouton.

Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics (pp. 95–188). University of Texas Press.

Westergaard, M., & Anderssen, M. (2015). Word order variation in Norwegian possessive constructions. In J. B. Johannessen, & J. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America. Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 21–45). Benjamins.

Whitney, W. D. (1881). On mixture in language. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 12, 5–26.

Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Blackwell.

(2019). Another look at the creolist hypothesis of AAVE Origins. In R. Blake, & I. Buchstaller (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the work of John R. Rickford (pp. 64–78). Routledge.

Zenner, E., Backus, A., & Winter-Froemel, E. (Eds.) (2019). Cognitive contact linguistics. De Gruyter.

Zenner, E., Heylen, K., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Most borrowable construction ever! A large-scale approach to contact-induced pragmatic change. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 134–149.

Ziem, A., Boas, H. C., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2014). Grammatische Konstruktionen und semantische Frames für die Textanalyse. In J. Hagemann, & S. Staffeldt (Eds.), Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich (pp. 297–333). Stauffenburg.