Cover not available

In:Multimodal Communication from a Construction Grammar Perspective
Edited by Kiki Nikiforidou and Mirjam Fried
[Constructional Approaches to Language 38] 2025
► pp. 190–219

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

An evidential function of raised eyebrows in interaction

Marking a differential in expectations

 | University Paris Nanterre
Published online: 16 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.38.06deb
Abstract
In the course of interaction, raised eyebrows is a facial display that can express a wide range of meanings, e.g. surprise, recognition, salience, or the anticipation of a response. I argue that these meanings are united by a common evidential feature: they mark a relation between the speaker and addressee’s respective knowledge or attitudes. More specifically, this intersubjective core function is to express a differential in expectations. In order to identify the form’s main functions and their multimodal contextual profiles (clusters of features), I combine quantitative statistical methods (multiple correspondence analysis), based on the fine-grained annotation of the corpus data (220 occurrences), with the qualitative analysis of excerpts. Sequential position is a key feature: in turn-initial position raised eyebrows mark a response, in turn-medial position they mark salience, and in turn-final position, other-orientation. In turn-initial and turn-final position raised eyebrows are multifunctional: they contribute to regulating turn-taking while displaying an attitude towards the previous or upcoming turn. As a visual form with a stable core meaning, raised eyebrows qualify as a recurrent gesture. Based on the characteristics of multifunctionality, intersubjectivity, and functional specialization depending on sequential position, raised eyebrows could also qualify as a visual pragmatic marker.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus and method
  • 3.Overview of the coding results
    • 3.1Main formal features
      • 3.1.1Sequential position
      • 3.1.2Gesture stroke and hold
      • 3.1.3Synchronization with, or isolation from, speech
      • 3.1.4Synchronization with a tonic accent
    • 3.2Multifactorial analysis
  • 4.Qualitative analyses: Occurrences in their contexts of use
    • 4.1Turn-initial position: Expressing counter-expectation
    • 4.2Turn-initial position: Expressing re-cognition
    • 4.3Turn-medial position: Marking salience
    • 4.4Turn-final position: Marking other-orientation
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2004). A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: the semantic field of expectation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (10), 1781–1805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Pragmatic markers. In J. Zienkowski, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 223–247). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allwood, J., & Cerrato, L. (2003). A study of gestural feedback expressions. In First Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication (pp. 7–22). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, G., & Fretheim, T. (Eds.). (2000). Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1983). Intonation and gesture. American Speech, 58 (2), 156–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouvet, D. (2001). La dimension corporelle de la parole : Les marques posturo-mimo-gestuelles de la parole, leurs aspects métonymiques et métaphoriques, et leur rôle au cours d’un récit. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browne, G. (1983). Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. In A. Cutler, & R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody, models and measurements (pp. 67–77). Berlin & Hambourg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, L. J. (1979). Smiles can be back channels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 728–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261–272). Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chovil, N. (1991). Discourse-oriented facial displays in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 163–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2015). The dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in talk: A perspective from cognitive linguistics. In Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Tartu, Estonia, August 6–8, 2014. [URL]
(2017a). Gesture and pragmatics: From paralinguistic to variably linguistic. In A. Barron, G. Steen, & Y. Gu (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 61–68). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistic Vanguard, 3 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, R. (2003). Synonyms in action: A case study. International Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 167–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998 [1872]). The Expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1, 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 371–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desagulier, G. (2017). Corpus linguistics and statistics with R. Introduction to quantitative methods in linguistics. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1979). About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In M. Cranach et al. (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and Limits of a new discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Rosenberg, E. L. (Eds.). (2005). Series in affective science. What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS) (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferré, G. (2012). Functions of three open-palm hand gestures. Multimodal Communication, 1(1), 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Analyse de discours multimodale. Grenoble: UGA Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2015). Construction Grammar. In A. Alexiadou, & T. Kiss (Eds.), Syntax — theory and analysis. An international handbook (pp. 974–1003). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 147–190). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 1–42). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraut, R. E., & Johnston, R. E. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling; An ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1539–1553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. (2014). Recurrent gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teβendorf (Eds.), Body — language — communication (pp. 1558–1575). Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter, Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marzano, M. (2008). L’éthique appliquée : De la théorie à la pratique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multi-modal practices : Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: Some systematic uses of the split-screen technique. Human Studies, 32(1), 67–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M.-A., & Danon-Boileau, L. (1998). Grammaire de l’intonation : L’exemple du français oral. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C., Ladewig, S. H., & Bressem, J. (2014). Gesture and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teβendorf (Eds.), Body — language — communication vol. 2 (pp. 55–81). Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 377–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, S., & Jucker, A. H. (2000). Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy between the propositional attitudes of conversational partners. In G. Andersen, & T. Fretheim (Eds.), Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude (pp. 207–237). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, F., & Turner, M. (2013). Multimodal construction grammar. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 255–274). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications/ University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassman, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06). Genova (Italy).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (Eds.). (2017). Towards a multimodal construction grammar. Linguistic Vanguard 3(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Crible, Ludivine & Loulou Kosmala
2025. Multimodal Pragmatic Markers of Feedback in Dialogue. Languages 10:6 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue