Cover not available

In:Constructions in Spanish
Edited by Inga Hennecke and Evelyn Wiesinger
[Constructional Approaches to Language 34] 2023
► pp. 28–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Collection nouns as a derivational category in Spanish

Analysing the productivity of collective suffixes on the basis of ad hoc constructs

 | University of Bielefeld
Published online: 18 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.02kle
Abstract
The paper examines the productivity of a constructional schema of collectivity in Spanish. We analyse nonce-formations derived from typical collective suffixes and classify their meanings. The analysis reveals that the derivation of collection nouns in Spanish is productive, mostly represented by the suffixes ‑erío and ‑amen. A comparison to French and Italian data further reveals a continuum of productivity of this schema in Romance languages. In Italian, it has various subordinated constructions instantiated by the suffixes ‑ame, ‑ume and ‑aglia, with French only being represented by the suffix ‑aille. The study reveals a detailed picture not only of the functional distribution of each suffix and language, but also the functional links between different forms, i.e. suffixes, and functions. The analysis implies that an onomasiological examination of collective nouns in Romance is not only fruitful, but indispensable.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Collection nouns as a derivational category in Spanish: State of the art
  • 3.Empirical analysis of collective ad hoc constructs in Spanish
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1The predominantly non-collective suffixes
      • 3.2.2The predominantly collective suffixes
      • 3.2.3General tendencies
  • 4.Digression: Collective ad hoc constructs in French and Italian
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Baayen, R. H. (1993). On frequency, transparency, and productivity. In G. Booij, & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992 (pp. 181–208). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldinger, K. (1950). Kollektivsuffixe und Kollektivbegriff: Ein Beitrag zur Bedeutungslehre im Französischen mit Berücksichtigung der Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Morphology in construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 255–273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Word-formation in construction grammar. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-Formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Vol. 4 (pp. 188–202). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Construction morphology. In A. Hippisley, & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1999). El nombre común. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 3–76). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dębowiak, P. (2014). La formation diminutive dans les langues romanes. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DECH=Corominas, J. (Ed.) (2012). Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico: Ed. on CD-ROM. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DRAE = Real Academia Española (Ed.) (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flaux, N. (1999). À propos des noms collectifs. Revue de linguistique romane, 63(251–252), 471–502.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. (2004). Nomi collettivi. In M. Grossmann, & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 244–252). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches (pp. 211–243). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), Linguistik aktuell: Vol. 132. The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 75–107). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joosten, F. (2006). Why club and lingerie do not belong together: A plea for redefining collective nouns. In G. Kleiber, C. Schnedecker, & A. Theissen (Eds.), Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale: Vol. 59. La relation partie-tout (pp. 73–88). Louvain/Paris/Dudley: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleineberg, D. (2022). The expression of “collectivity” in Romance languages: An empirical analysis on nominal aspectuality with focus on French. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lammert, M. (2010). Sémantique et cognition: Les noms collectifs. Genf: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luján, E. (2010). Semantic maps and word formation: Agents, instruments, and related semantic roles. Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 162–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, C. (2017). Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language: Applications in interdisciplinary contexts (pp. 297–326). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisterfeld, R. (1998). Numerus und Nominalaspekt: Eine Studie zur romanischen Apprehension. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaux, C. (1992). The collectives in French: A linguistic investigation. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 26(1), 99–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, W. (2015). Collectives. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-Formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Vol. 4 (pp. 1183–1195). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MM=Moliner, M. (Ed.). (1998). Diccionario de uso del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, C., & Penello, N. (2006). Propagazione di suffissi derivazionali nel linguaggio giovanile. In G. Marcato (Ed.), Giovani, lingue e dialetti (pp. 73–80). Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ponce de León, R. (2016). Análisis morfológico, semántico y lexicográfico del sufijo ‑erío en el español de México. Thesaurus, 58, 30–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rainer, F. (1993). Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018a). La descendencia colectiva, aumentativa e intensiva del sufijo latino ‑aria en las lenguas románicas. VERBA, 45, 225–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018b). Patterns and niches in diachronic word formation: The fate of the suffix ‑men from Latin to Romance. Morphology, 28, 397–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española, & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española: Morfología, Sintaxis I. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. (2002). The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santiago Lacuesta, R., & Bustos Gisbert, E. (1999). La derivación nominal. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 4505–4594). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2008). Typological correlations in nominal determination in Romance. In H. Høeg Müller, & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management (pp. 45–63). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
TLFi = ATILF – CNRS, & Université de Lorraine (Eds.). Trésor de la langue française informatisé, [URL].
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zing=Zingarelli, N. (Ed.). (2007). Lo Zingarelli. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kleineberg, Désirée & Wiltrud Mihatsch
2025. Diachronic evidence for Spanish object mass nouns as a peripheral category. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue