Cover not available

In:Constructions in Spanish
Edited by Inga Hennecke and Evelyn Wiesinger
[Constructional Approaches to Language 34] 2023
► pp. 2–26

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Construction Grammar meets
Hispanic linguistics

 | University of Tübingen
 | University of Tübingen
Published online: 18 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.01hen
Abstract
This chapter offers an introduction to the topic and to the individual contributions of the present volume. First, it presents an evaluation of the general potential of combining (usage-based and cognitively oriented) Construction Grammar with Hispanic (and Romance) linguistics. Further, it aims at highlighting the innovative perspective of Construction Grammar(s) in comparison to more traditional approaches for the linguistic phenomena covered in this volume. The chapter concludes with a brief overview of the structure of the book as well as of the individual contributions.
Article outline
  • 1.Constructions in Spanish
  • 2.Constructionist and traditional perspectives on Spanish
    • 2.1Word-level constructions
    • 2.2Phrase-level constructions with idiomatic meanings
    • 2.3Sentence-level constructions with grammatical, discourse-pragmatic or speech-act functions
    • 2.4Extending the scope
      • 2.4.1Historical linguistics and diachronic Construction Grammar
      • 2.4.2Language learning and teaching and Construction Grammar(s)
      • 2.4.3Interactional linguistics and Construction Grammar(s)
  • 3.Conclusion and contributions of the present volume
  • Notes
  • References
References (149)
References
Acedo-Matellán, V., & Pineda, A. (2019). Light verb constructions in Basque and Romance. In A. Berro Urrizelki, B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Basque and Romance. Aligning Grammars (pp. 176–220). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, J. (2019). Caerle/venirle/(entrarle) en Nagrado: sobre el origen y la expansión de un subesquema construccional obsoleto. Scriptum Digital, 8, 53–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Almela, R., Ramón Trives, E., & Wotjak, G. (Eds.). (2005). Fraseología contrastiva: con ejemplos tomados del alemán, español, francés e italiano (pp. 91–109). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvar, M., & Pottier, B. (1983). Morfología histórica del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1–L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 621–636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audring, J., & Masini, F. (2019). Introduction: Theory and theories in Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theories (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S. (Eds.). (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B. K., & Plauché, M. C. (2005). The convergent evolution of radial constructions. French and English deictics and existentials. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics, 49(6), 1271–1303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Lexical and phrasal approaches to argument structure: Two sides of the same coin. Theoretical Linguistics, 40(1–2), 89–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Gonzálvez-García, F. (2014a). Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In H. C. Boas, & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar (pp. 1–35). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2014b). Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Construction Morphology, a brief introduction. Morphology, 22(3), 343–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (2012). Mood: Indicative vs. Subjunctive. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, & E. O'Rourke. (Eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics (pp. 373–394). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouveret, M., & Legallois, D. (Eds.). (2012). Constructions in French. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, A. (1993). Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): su papel argumentativo. Contextos, XI(21/22), 145–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). El español coloquial – situación y uso. Madrid: Acro Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bustos Plaza, A. (2008). Relaciones de dependencia sintáctica y semántica en combinaciones verbonominales lexicalizadas. In C. Mellado Blanco (Ed.), Colocaciones y fraseología en los diccionarios (pp. 53–67). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Combinaciones verbonominales y lexicalización. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bürgel, C., Gévaudan, P., & Siepmann, D. (Eds.). (2021). Sprachwissenschaft und Fremdsprachendidaktik: Konstruktionen und Konstruktionslernen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, R. (2004). La morfología histórica del español en los últimos cien años. Lexis, 28(1–2), 71–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claes, J. (2014). Sociolingüística comparada y gramática de construcciones: Un acercamiento a la pluralización de haber en las capitales antillanas. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 338–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpas Pastor, G. (1997). Manual de fraseología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1977). Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In H. E. Brekle, & D. Kastovsky (Eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung (pp. 48–61), Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Les procédés sémantiques dans la formation des mots. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 35, 3–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussé, E., Andersson, P., & Olofsson, J. (Eds.). (2018). Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dankel, P., & Soto Rodríguez, M. (2018). Patrones prosódicos en construcciones enumerativas – una visión desde la perspectiva del contacto Español – Quechua. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 32(2), 35–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G. (2016). Exploring L2 constructionist approaches. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 3–18). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., Mollica, F., & Kuhn, J. (Eds.). (2013). Konstruktionsgrammatik und Romanische Sprachen. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Della Putta, P. (2016). Do We also Need to Unlearn Constructions? The Case of Constructional Negative Transfer from Spanish to Italian and Its Pedagogical Implications. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 237–268). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demonte, V., & Fernández Soriano, O. (2014). Evidentiality and illocutionary force: Spanish matrix que at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In A. Dufter, & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist, and typological perspectives (pp. 217–252). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2006). Construction Grammar – Eine Grammatik für die Interaktion? In A. Deppermann, R. Fiehler, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Grammatik und Interaktion (pp. 43–65). Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III: Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 205–238). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H., & Fischer, O. (2017). The role of analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In M. Hundt, S. Mollin, & S. E. Pfenninger (Eds.), The changing English language. Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 240–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2019a). Usage-based Construction Grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 50–80). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G. (2011). Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics, 49(2), 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobrovol’skij, D. (2016). Грамматика конструкций и фразеология. Вопросы языкознания, 3, 7–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobrovolsk’ij D. (2011). Phraseologie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III: Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 111–130). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressel, D. & Teixeira Kalkhoff, A. M. (2019). Co-constructing utterances in face-to-face-interaction: a multimodal analysis of collaborative completions in spoken Spanish. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 2(2) .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Döhla, H. -J. & Hennemann, A. (Eds.). (2021). Konstruktionsgrammatische Zugänge zu romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, D. (1998). Subordinación y recursividad en la conversación: Las secuencias integradas por intercambios ecoicos. Diálogos Hispánicos, 22. Special issue La pragmática lingüística del español. Recientes desarrollos, 277–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, O. (2016). Adverbial patterns in interaction. In O. Ehmer, & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), Special Issue of Language Sciences, 58, 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Makrokonstruktionen. Komplexe Adverbialstrukturen zwischen lokaler Emergenz und Sedimentierung im gesprochenen Französisch. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, R., & Comer, M. (2018). Evaluating grammaticalization and constructional accounts: The development of the inchoative construction with put verbs in Spanish. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar (pp. 107–133). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (2006). Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktion. In K. Fischer, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 133–150). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Kognitive Routinen oder soziale Praktiken: Gesprächsanalyse und das Verhältnis von Kognition und Interaktion. In A. Ziem, & A. Lasch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen (pp. 245–257). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2017 [2000]). Lingüística pragmática y análisis del discurso. 3ª. ed. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garachana Camarero, M. (Ed.). (2020a). La evolución de las perífrasis verbales en español. Una aproximación desde la gramática de construcciones diacrónica y la gramaticalización. Berlin: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). ¿Es necesaria una gramática de construcciones diacrónica? In M. Garachana Camarero (Ed.), La evolución de las perífrasis verbales en español. Una aproximación desde la gramática de construcciones diacrónica y la gramaticalización (pp. 45–72). Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Page, M. (1996). Sobre las variantes fraseológicas en español. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos, 20(3), 477–490.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girón Alconchel, J. L., & Sáez Rivera, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). Procesos de gramaticalización en la historia del español. Frankfurt a. M.: Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 289–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Rey, M. I. (Ed.). (2015): Special Issue Phraseology, Phraseodidactics and Construction Grammar(s). Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granvik, A. (2018). The development of the conditional caso construction in Spanish. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & Olofsson, J. (Eds.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar (pp. 205–239). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gras, P. (2011). Gramática de Construcciones en Interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination. Insubordinate que-constructions in Spanish. In N. Evans, & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 113–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gras, P., & Sansiñena Pascual, M. S. (2015). An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk, 35(4), 505–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B., & Gries, S. T. (2018). Syntax from and for discourse II: More on complex sentences as meso-constructions. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 115–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennecke, I. (2020). Internal constituent variability and semantic transparency in N Prep N constructions in Romance languages. In S. Schulte im Walde, & E. Smolka (Eds.), The role of constituents in multiword expressions: An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual perspective (pp. 129–154). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, T. (2016) Foreign language learning is construction learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 21–52). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., Cadierno, T., & Ibarretxe-Atuñano, I. (2016). Learning the Placement Caused Motion Construction in L2 Spanish. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 185–210). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2011). Was ist Konstruktionswandel? In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 59–76). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Historical Sociolinguistics and Construction Grammar. From mutual challenges to mutual benefits. In T. Säily, A. Nurmi, M. Palander-Collin, & A. Auer (Eds.), Exploring future paths for Historical Sociolinguistics (pp. 217–237). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang (Ed.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. (2017). Construction Grammars. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 310–329). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Bergs, A. (2018). A Construction Grammar approach to genre. CogniTextes, 18, [URL] [20/12/2022]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013): The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummel, M. (2012). Einzelaspekt: Modus. In J. Born, R. Folger, C. F. Laferl, & B. Pöll. (Eds.), Handbuch Spanisch (pp. 324–329). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Der Grundwert des spanischen Subjunktivs. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hüning, M., & Schlücker, B. (2015). Multi-word expressions. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-Formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp. 450–467). Berlin/München/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B. (2011). A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. Faits de Langues, 38(2), 151–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2007). Construction Grammar und Gesprochene-Sprache-Forschung. Konstruktionen mit zehn matrixsatzfähigen Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1, 69–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabatek, J. (Ed.). (2008). Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico: Nuevas perspectivas desde las tradiciones discursivas. Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2016). Lingüística de corpus y lingüística histórica iberorrománica. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalkhoff, A. M. (2015). Co-constructions syntaxiques du dialogue en français, espagnol et allemand parlés. In S. Diao-Klaeger, & B. Thörle (Eds.), Linguistique interactionnelle contrastive : Grammaire et interaction dans les langues romanes (pp. 95–106). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G. (2010). Comment clauses as constructions. Vienna English Working Papers, 19(1–2), 21–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, P. (1997). Diskurstraditionen: Zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und ihrer Dynamik. In B. Frank (Ed.), Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit (pp. 43–79). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Es gibt keine Konstruktionsbedeutung ohne Bedeutungswandel. Valenz – Konstruktion – Diachronie. In S. Dörr, & T. Städtler (Eds.), Ki bien voldreit raisun entendre. Mélanges en l’honneur du 70e anniversaire de Frankwalt Möhren (pp. 147–174). Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Legallois, D., & Patard, A. (Eds.). (2017). Les constructions comme unités de la langue : illustrations, évaluation, critique. Numéro spécial de Langue Française, 194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization. A programmatic sketch. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M. A., & E. Montolío Durán (Eds.). (1998). Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Vázquez, M. (Ed.). (2003). Gramática de construcciones. Contrastes entre el inglés y el español. Huelva: Grupo de Gramática Contrastiva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, F. (2009). Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: a constructionist perspective. Word Structure, 2, 254–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Grammatica delle Costruzioni. Un’introduzione. Roma: Carocci editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Binominal constructions in Italian of the N1-di-N2 type: Towards a typology of Light Noun Constructions. Language Sciences, 53, 99–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Competition between morphological words and multiword expressions. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, W. U. Dressler, & H. C. Luschützky (Eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation (pp. 281–305). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1948 [1912]). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In A. Meillet (Ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melis, C., & Flores, M. (2012). Emergence and grammaticalization of constructions within the se me network of Spanish. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. New reflections (pp. 249–270). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C. (2015). El valor de ‘construcción’ de los somatismos reflexivos de daño físico en alemán y la búsqueda de equivalencias en español. In R. S. Monteiro Plantin (Ed.), Certas Palavras não Leva o Vento (pp. 85–108). Fortaleza: Parole.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Phrasem-Konstruktionen kontrastiv Deutsch-Spanisch: Ein korpusbasiertes Beschreibungsmodell anhand ironischer Vergleiche. Yearbook of Phraseology, 10, 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Esquemas fraseológicos y construcciones fraseológicas en el contínuum léxico-gramática. In E. Tabares, C. Sinner, & E. T. Montoro (Eds.), Clases y categorías en la fraseología de la lengua española (pp. 13–36). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & Gutiérrez Rubio, E. (Eds.). (2020). Gramática de construcciones y fraseología en las lenguas románicas. Thematic issue of Romanica Olomucensia, 32(1), [URL] [20/12/2022].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & Iglesias Iglesias, N. M. (2011). Significado y análisis de corpus en la fraseografía bilingüe español-alemán. In S. Roiss, C. Fortea Gil, Á. Recio Ariza, B. Santana López, P. Zimmermann, & I. Holl (Eds.), En las vertientes de la traducción e interpretación del/al alemán (pp. 119–133). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & López Meirama, B. (2019). Entre miradas de asombro: aportaciones de la Lingüística de Corpus al estudio de una construcción con la preposición entre. In M. Blanco Domínguez, H. Olbertz, & V. Vázquez Rozas (Eds.), Corpus y construcciones: perspectivas hispánicas (pp. 81–120). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., Mollica, F., & Schafroth, E. (Eds.). (2022). Konstruktionen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik: Phrasem-Konstruktionen monolingual, bilingual und multilingual. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miranda, N. S., & Salomão, M. M. (2009). Construções do Português do Brasil: da Gramática ao Discurso. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Á. S. (2018). ¿Tradiciones discursivas o tradicionalidad? ¿Gramaticalización o sintactización? Difusión y declive de las construcciones modales con infinitivo antepuesto. In J. L. Girón Alconchel, F. J. Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, & D. M. Sáez Rivera (Eds.), Procesos de textualización y gramaticalización en la historia del español (pp. 79–134). Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oesterreicher, W. (2003). Sprachwandel – Corpusbefunde, Sprachregeln, kognitive Konstanten. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 53, 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). La historicidad del lenguaje: Variación, diversidad y cambio lingüístico. In J. J. de Bustos Tovar, & J. L. Girón Alconchel (Eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española. Madrid, 29 de septiembre-3 de octubre de 2003 (pp. 137–158). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid/Arco/Asociación de Historia de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, J. -O. (2005). Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J. -O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). From Construction Grammar to construction discourse … and back. In J. Bücker, S. Günthner, & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V. Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten (pp. 15–43). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portolés, J. (1998): Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quochi, V. (2016): Development and representation of Italian light-fare constructions. In J. Yoon, & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar (pp. 39–64). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, T. M. (2008a). Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista española de lingüística aplicada, 21, 269–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Marcas enunciativas y evidenciales en el discurso periodístico. In I. Olza, M. Casado Velarde, & R. González Ruiz (Eds.), Actas del XXXVII Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL) (pp. 735–744). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothe, W. (1967). Strukturen des Konjunktivs im Französischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schemann, H., Mellado Blanco, C., Buján, P., Iglesias Iglesias, N., Larreta, J. P., & Mansilla, A. (2013). Idiomatik Deutsch-Spanisch. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H. -J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selig, M., Morlicchio, E., & Dittmar, N. (Eds.). (2016). Gesprächsanalyse zwischen Syntax und Pragmatik. Deutsche und italienische Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, L., & Smirnova, E. (Eds.). (2020). Nodes and networks in diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steyer, K. (Ed.). (2018). Sprachliche Verfestigung. Wortverbindungen, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. Joseph, & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Modeling language change with constructional networks. In S. Pons Bordería, & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers. New issues in the study of language change (pp. 17–50). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2008). Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV. Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela Manzanares, J., & Rojo López, A. M. (2008). What can language learners tell us about constructions? In S. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar. Volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 197–229). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wandruszka, U. (2000). Über die Bedeutung des romanischen Konjunktivs und die Geburt des Nebensatzes. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 116(1), 56–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiesinger, E. (2020). ¿Esto se echa para atrás? Aproximación a los verbos sintagmáticos en el español peninsular a base de un estudio de corpus de [V para atrás]. In C. Mellado Blanco, & E. Gutiérrez Rubio (Eds.), Gramática de construcciones y fraseología en las lenguas románicas. Thematic issue of Romanica Olomucensia, 32(1), 201–230, [URL] [20/12/2022].
(2021a). Verb-particle constructions in Spanish. An extended usage-based and cognitively oriented Construction Grammar framework. Habilitation thesis, University of Regensburg.
(2021b). The Spanish verb-particle construction [V para atrás]: Disentangling constructional contact and change. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in Contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 140–187). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in prep.). Einführung in die Konstruktiongrammatik für RomanistInnen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Ziem, A. (2015). Desiderata und Perspektiven einer ‘Social Construction Grammar’. In A. Ziem, & A. Lasch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen (pp. 1–12). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Construction Grammar meets Phraseology: eine Standortbestimmung. Linguistik online, 90(3), [URL] [20/12/2022]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziem, A., & Lasch, A. (2013). Konstruktionsgrammatik. Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuloaga, A. (1980). Introducción al estudio de las expresiones fijas. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue