In:Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Martin Hilpert, Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructional Approaches to Language 32] 2021
► pp. 1–11
Modality in Diachronic Construction Grammar
Long-standing questions, new perspectives
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32.01hil
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32.01hil
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The contributions in this volume
- 3.Concluding remarks
References
References (32)
Bergs, Alexander, & Diewald, Gabriele (Eds.). (2008). Constructions
and language
change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike (Eds.). (2015). Diachronic
Construction
Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2005). Lexicalization
and Language
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. & Fleischman, Suzanne. (1995). Modality
in Grammar and
Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cappelle, Bert. (2006). Particle
placement and the case for
‘allostructions’. Constructions+online, Special volume 1. [URL]. Accessed 14 June 2021.
Correia Saavedra, David. (2019). Measurements
of Grammaticalization: Developing a quantitative index for the study
of grammatical change. PhD
Dissertation. Université de Neuchâtel.
Coussé, Evie. (2014). Lexical
expansion in the HAVE and BE perfect in Dutch: A constructionist
prototype
account. Diachronica, 31(2), 159–191.
De Smet, Hendrik. (2013). Spreading
patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of
complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diessel, Holger. (2019). The
Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language
Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, Gabriele. (2006). Context
types in grammaticalization as
constructions. Constructions+online,
Special volume 1. [URL]. Accessed 14 June 2020.
. (2020). Paradigms
lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as
hyper-constructions. In Lotte Sommerer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and Networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 278–315). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diewald, Gabriele, & Smirnova, Elena. (2012). Paradigmatic
integration: the fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization
scenario. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems, & Tanja Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization
and Language Change. New
reflections. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 111–133.
Fischer, Olga. (2007). Morphosyntactic
Change: Functional and Formal
Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, Martin. (2013). Constructional
Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and
Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2016). Change
in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of
may. Constructions and Frames, 8(1), 66–85.
. (2019). Higher-order
schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to
find them. Word
Structure, 12(3), 261–273.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. (2004). Lexicalization
and grammaticization: Opposite or
orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann, & Björn Wiemer (Eds.), What
makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its
components (pp. 21–42). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krug, Manfred. (2000). Emerging
English modals: A corpus-based study of
grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kuteva, Tanja. (2001). Auxiliation.
An Enquiry into the Nature of
Grammaticalization. Oxford: University Press.
Narrog, Heiko. (2012). Modality,
Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic
Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neels, Jakob. (2015). The
history of the quasi-auxiliary USE(D) TO: A usage-based
account. Journal of Historical
Linguistics, 5(2), 177–234.
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Heltoft, Lars, & Schøsler, Lene (Eds.). (2011). Connecting
grammaticalisation: The role of paradigmatic
structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Okamoto, Shigeko. (1995). Pragmaticization
of meaning in some sentence-final particles in
Japanese. In Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays
on semantics and
pragmatics, (pp. 219–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Perek, Florent. (2015). Argument
Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and
Corpus-based
Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Plank, Frans. (1984). The
modals story retold. Studies in
Language, 8(3), 305–64.
Smirnova, Elena, & Sommerer, Lotte. (2020). The
nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic
Construction
Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and Networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 2–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan, Th. (2003). Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and
constructions, International Journal
of Corpus
Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (1989). On
the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of
subjectification in semantic
change. Language, 57(1), 33–65.
Traugott, E. and G. Trousdale. (2013). Constructionalization
and constructional
change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van der Auwera, Johan, & Plungian, Vladimir A. (1998). Modality’s
semantic map. Linguistic
Typology, 2. 79–124.
Zehentner, Eva, & Traugott, Closs E. (2020). Constructional
networks and the development of benefactive ditransitives in
English. In Lotte Sommer, & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and Networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 168–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.