In:Constructions in Contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition
Edited by Hans C. Boas and Steffen Höder
[Constructional Approaches to Language 30] 2021
► pp. 191–232
Non-Dravidian elements and (non)diasystematic change in Malayalam
Published online: 3 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.30.07nam
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.30.07nam
Abstract
This chapter applies a Diasystematic Construction Grammar (DCxG) approach to account for non-Dravidian vocabulary and phonology in Malayalam, a high-contact Dravidian language. The distinction made in DCxG between diaconstructions, which are language non-specific, and idioconstructions, which are language-specific, proves useful in accounting for semantic specialization and phonological heterogeneity due to language contact. Notably, increased contact with English has led in some cases to decreased phonological adaptation, as some constructions change from diaconstructions to idioconstructions: Non-diasystematic change. Taken together, this chapter argues that any analysis of Malayalam must account for non-Dravidian subpatterns, and including language labels as part of speakers’ linguistic knowledge enhances our understanding of the dynamics of language contact.
Article outline
- 1.High-contact languages are not categorically different
- 1.1“Stratified lexicon” without a lexicon
- 1.2Note on the data
- 2.Language contact in Malayalam
- 2.1Sanskrit
- 2.2Arabic
- 2.3Portuguese and Dutch
- 2.4English
- 2.4.1English pre-1950s
- 2.4.2English post-1950s and today
- 2.5Interim summary: History and hybrid Malayalam
- 3.The role of non-Dravidian words across social and semantic domains
- 3.1Sanskrit
- 3.2Arabic
- 3.3Portuguese and Dutch
- 3.4English
- 3.4.1Semantic specialization
- 3.4.2Semantic specialization with Western connotation
- 3.4.3Motivations for using English-origin words
- 3.4.4English-origin words requiring further explanation
- 3.5Interim summary: Word origins and meaning
- 4.Heterogeneity in Malayalam phonology
- 4.1Heterogeneity in sounds
- 4.2Heterogeneity in syllable structure
- 5.Socio-cognitively motivated non-diasystematic change
- 6.Word-final schwa as a Phonological Language Marker of Malayalam
- 7.Malayalam as a hybrid language
Notes References
References (64)
Abraham, F. (2019). Mother tongue influence of Malayalam in the English loanwords used in Malayalam. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 7(2), 32–34.
Adler, A. N. (2006). Faithfulness and perception in loanword adaptation: A case study from Hawaiian. Lingua, 116(7), 1024–1045.
Alves, M. (2009). Vietnamese. In M. Haspelmath, & U. Tadmor (Eds.) World Loanword Database. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. Retrieved from [URL], date of access 14 May 2019.
Fourteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly. Malayalam Language (Compulsory Language) Bill. (2017). Kerala Niyamasabha Printing Press: Thiruvanthanthapuram. Retrieved from [URL], date of access 30 June 2017.
Backus, A. (2013). A usage-based approach to borrowability. In E. Zenner & G. Kristiansen (Eds), New perspectives on lexical borrowing (pp. 19–40). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bryant, E., & Patton, L. L. (2005). The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History. New York: Routledge.
Bucholtz, M. (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of linguistic anthropology, 11(1), 84–100.
Cheerangote, S. (2012). An analysis on hybridization in Arabi Malayalam. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 96–103.
Cody, F. (2013). The light of knowledge: Literacy activism and the politics of writing in South India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cyran, E. (2001). Parameters and scales in syllable markedness: the right edge of the word in Malayalam. In K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (Ed.), Constraints and Preferences (pp. 1–40). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dobbin, C. E. (1970). Basic Documents in the Development of Modern India and Pakistan, 1835–1947. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Downing, L. J. et al. (2006). Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Number 12. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive science, 33(4), 547–582.
Faraclas, N., & Klein, T. B. (2009). Simplicity and complexity in creoles and pidgins. London: Battlebridge.
Gamliel, O. (2013). Voices yet to be heard: On listening to the last speakers of Jewish Malayalam. Journal of Jewish Languages, 1(1), 135–167.
Gargesh, R. (2006). On nativizing the Indian English poetic medium. World Englishes, 25(3–4), 359–371.
George, K. M. (1972). Western influence on Malayalam language and literature. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.
Govindankutty, A. (1972). From proto-Tamil-Malayalam to west coast dialects. Indo-Iranian Journal, 14(1), 52–60.
Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 351–379.
Höder, S. (2012). Multilingual constructions. A diasystematic approach to common structures (pp. 241–258). In K. Braunmüller, & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
(2019). Phonological schematicity in multilingual constructions: A diasystematic perspective on lexical form. Word Structure, 12(3), 334–352.
Ilias, M. (2007). Mappila Muslims and the cultural content of trading Arab diaspora on the Malabar coast. Asian Journal of Social Science, 35(4–5), 434–56.
Itô, J., & Mester, A. (1993). Japanese phonology: constraint domains and structure preservation. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 817–838). Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Kala, C. (1977). Hybrid conversational Malayalam the role of English in the Kerala social situation. Anthropological Linguistics, 19(6), 265–273.
Kerala Department of Education. (2011). Kerala Department of Education Statistical Report. Technical report. Retrieved from [URL], date of access 10 November 2016.
Kristiansen, G. (2008). Style-shifting and shifting styles: A socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation. Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems, 45–90.
Kurien, P. (1994). Colonialism and ethnogenesis: A study of Kerala, India. Theory and Society, 23(3), 385–417.
Lieten, G. (2002). Human development in Kerala: structure and agency in history. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(16), 1539–1544.
Manilal, K. S. (2012). Hortus Malabaricus and the socio-cultural heritage of India. Indian Association for Angiosperm Taxonomy, Department of Botany. University of Calicut.
Mathew, E. (1999). Growth of literacy in Kerala: State intervention, missionary initiatives and social movements. Economic and political weekly, 34(39), 2811–2820.
McConvell, P. (2009). Gurindji. In M. Haspelmath, & U. Tadmor (Eds.) World Loanword Database. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. Retrieved from [URL], date of access 14 May 2019.
Meakins, F., Hua, X., Algy, C., & Bromham, L. (2019). Birth of a contact language did not favor simplification. Language 95(2), 294–332.
Mohanan, T., & Mohanan, K. (2003). Towards a theory of constraints in OT: emergence of the not-so-unmarked in Malayalee English. Available as ROA-601 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Mufwene, S. (2000). Creolization is a social, not structural, process. In I. Neumann-Holzschuh, & E. Schneider (Eds.), Degrees of restructuring in Creole languages (pp. 65–84). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1997). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Namboodiripad, S. (2017). An experimental approach to variation and variability in constituent order (Doctoral dissertation, UC San Diego).
Namboodiripad, S., & Garellek, M. (2017). Malayalam (Namboodiri dialect). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 47(1), 109–118.
Namboodiripad, S., Garellek, M., & Baković, E. (2015). Moraic geminates in Malayalam: Evidence from loanwords and minimal word constraints. Paper presented at the Old Word Conference in Phonology. Barcelona, Spain.
(in prep.). Moraic geminates in Malayalam: Evidence from loanwords and minimal word constraints.
Namboodiripad, U. (1989). The speech of Namboodiris: A sociolinguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kerala.
Nayar, P. (1991). Sociological Implications of Language Contact. Anthropos, 86(4/6), 528–535. Retrieved from [URL], date of access 10 May 2019.
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of language and social psychology, 18(1), 62–85.
Park, H., & de Jong, K. J. (2008). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 704–723.
Rantattani, H. (2007). Mappila Muslims: a study on society and anti colonial struggles. Calicut: Other Books.
Ricci, R. (2011). Islam translated: Literature, conversion, and the Arabic cosmopolis of South and Southeast Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2017). Reexamining differential object marking as a linguistic contact phenomenon in Gernika Basque. Journal of Language Contact, 10(2), 318–352.
Rosa, J. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183.
Sridhar, S. (1981). Linguistic convergence: Indo-Aryanization of Dravidian languages. Lingua. 53(2–3), 199–220.
Srinivas, M. N. (1989). The cohesive role of Sanskritization and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomason, S. G. (2001). Contact-induced language change and pidgin/creole genesis. Creole Language Library, 23, 249–262.
Vaish, V. (2005). A peripherist view of English as a language of decolonization in post-colonial India. Language Policy, 4(2), 187–206.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2025. Diasystematic Construction Grammar at work. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 22 ff.
Namboodiripad, Savithry
Warmuth, Matthias
2025. Construction Grammar and phonology?. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 247 ff.
Krishnan, Gayathri G., Arathi Raghunathan & Vaijayanthi M. Sarma
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
