In:Give Constructions across Languages
Edited by Myriam Bouveret
[Constructional Approaches to Language 29] 2021
► pp. 223–243
Chapter 9
Grammar in usage and grammaticalization of dan
‘give’ constructions in Kurmanji Kurdish
Published online: 10 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.29.09aki
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.29.09aki
Belonging to the family of Indo-European languages, Kurdish is part
of the Iranian group of this family, which gathers several modern
languages such as Balochi, Ossetic, Persian, Tadjik, etc. The two
main dialects that are closely related to each other are the
Kurmanji dialect and the
Sorani dialect. The Kurmanji dialect, spoken by 65% of the Kurds, appears more archaic
than the other dialects in its phonetic and morphological structure.
We focus on two dominant grammatical categories used with
dan ‘give’ in Kurmanji Kurdish, light verb
constructions (LVC) and causative constructions, illustrating issues
of language change. Causative and light verb constructions are
dominant in the Kurdish language, as illustrated through our various
corpora. We illustrate the grammaticalization of
dan in Kurmandji Kurdish corresponding to a
typological fact found in other languages (Bouveret 2012; Gougenheim 1929; Von Waldenfels 2012; Newman 1997, 1998). We show that the
causative use of dan as an auxiliary construction
is a major grammatical fact in the Kurmanji Kurdish and categorize
three kinds of causative constructions.
As discussed in the grammaticalization literature, the wide usage of
a very common verb, and its extensive productivity can lead to a
bleaching process from full verb towards auxiliary. The
grammaticalization process for dan is also shown in
Kurmanji Kurdish through the use of light verb constructions and the
high productivity of the verb in compounds.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Object of the paper
- 1.2Traditional grammars
- 1.3Salient linguistic characteristics of Kurmanji Kurdish
- 1.4The corpora
- 2.Analysis
- 2.1Results
- 2.2Polysemy and productivity of dan in
synchrony
- 2.2.1Definition and examples of dan in dictionaries
- 2.2.2 Newspapers
- 3.Verbal constructions
- 3.1 Light verb constructions (LVC)
- 3.2Light verbs and reflexive forms
- 3.3Various causative constructions with dan
- 3.3.1The causative construction [dan + kirin V-Inf]
- 3.3.2Simple causation [dan V-Inf]
- 3.3.3Double causation with [dan + causative morpheme] and in the transitive/intransitive alternation [ dan + V-and]
- 3.3.4A complex construction: Light verb and causative constructions: [dan + kirin V-Inf]
- Conclusion
List of abbreviations Notes References
References (49)
Akin, S. (2002). Discours rapporté et hétérogénéité discursive en
kurde, Faits de langue, n°19, 71–84.
(2006). Le médiatif : l’émergence d’une nouvelle
catégorie grammaticale en kurde ?, 7e Colloque Chronos, Anvers, 18–20 sept. 2006.
(2011). Language planning in Diaspora : The case of
Kurdish Kurmanji dialect, Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 2–1, Ed. by Urmas Sutrop, Karl Pajusalu and Mari Mets. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool: 10–29.
Badilli, K. (1965). Türkçe Izahli Kürtçe Grameri (Kurmançça
Lehçesi) [Grammaire kurde avec des explications en turc (Dialecte
Kurmanji)], Ankara Basim ve Ciltevi, 160 p.
Bedir Khan, Dj. & Lescot R. (1991). Grammaire kurde (Dialecte kurmandji), Maisonneuve, Paris, 388 p.
Bouveret, M. (2008). Give verb-object constructions in French from
grammar to idioms. BLS 34, n°1. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the
Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, February 16, 2008, 35–56.
(2012). Give verb object constructions in
French. Bouveret and Legallois (eds), Constructions in French (2012), John Benjamins publishing company, 99–126.
Bulut, C. (2000). Indirectivity in Kurmanji. Evidentials : Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 147–184.
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The
Role of Frequency. B. Joseph, & R. Janda, (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 602–623.
(2014). The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and
Functional. Tomasello M. (ed)., 2014. Volume 2, Psychology Press, 145–147.
Ciwan, M. (1992). Türkçe Açiklamali Kürtçe Dilbilgisi Dilbilgisi [Grammaire kurde avec des explications en turc], Bölinge, Jina Nû, 224 p.
Garzoni, M. (1787). Grammatica e Vocabulario della lingua kurda, Rome, éd. Sacra Congregazione di Propaganda Filde, 288 p.
Gosselin, L. (1996). Sémantique de la temporalité en français. Un modèle
calculatoire et cognitif du temps et de l’aspect, Louvain-la-neuve, Duculot, co. Recherches, 292 p.
Gougenheim, G. (1929). Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue
française, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
Haig, G. (2002). The corpus of contemporary Kurdish newspaper
texts (CCKNT) : A pilot project in corpus linguistics for
Kurdish. Kurdische Studien (1)2. Berlin, 148–155.
Haig, G. and Matras, Y. (2002). Kurdish linguistics: a brief overview. Language Typology and Universals 55. 3–14. Walter De Gruyter. Akademie Verlag.
Hassanpour, A. (1992). Nationalism and language in Kurdistan,
1918–1985, San Francisco: Mellon Research University Press, 520 p.
Heine, B., Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African
Languages. Helmut Buske, 308 p.
Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. University of Chicago Press.
Hirori, N. (2005). Rewşa zimanê kurdî li Îraqê. Nefel, [URL]
Jardine, R. F. (1922). Bahdinan Kurmanji. A grammar of the Kurmanji of the
Kurds of Mosul division and surrounding districts of
Kurdistan, Baghdad, the Government Press, 114 p.
Kamandar, F. I. (2003). Les Dialectes kurdes méridionaux: Etude linguistique et
dialectologique, Peeters, Col. Acta Iranica, 920 p.
Lamiroy, B. (1999). Auxiliaires, langues romanes et
grammaticalisation. Langages, n° 13 5, Larousse. 33–45.
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary
Investigation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Working Papers. Assidue Arbeitspapiere des Seminars
für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.
Nr.9.
Matras, Y. (1992–1993). Ergativity in Kurmanji. Notes on its use and
distribution. Orientalia Suecana XLI–XLII, 139–154.
Meillet, A. (1912). Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-
européennes. 3e édition corrigée et augmentée. Paris, Hachette. In-8°, xxvi–502 p.
Newman, J. (ed.) (1998). The Linguistics of Giving. [Studies in Typological Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 384 p.
(1996). Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. [Cognitive Linguistics Research 7] Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 319 p.
Rhea, S. A. (1880). Brief Grammar and Vocabulary of the Kurdish Language of
the Hakari District, éd. American Oriental Studies, 155 p.
Scalbert Yücel, C. (2006). La diaspora kurde en Suède. Conservation,
production et diffusion d’un savoir
linguistique. European Journal of Turkish Studies, Thematic Issue N°5,
Power, ideology, knowledge – deconstructing Kurdish
Studies, URL : [URL].
Shibatani, M. (ed.) (2002). The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal
Manipulation. [Typological Studies in Language, 48] 2002. xviii, John Benjamins Publihsing Company. 551 p.
Tan, S. (2000). Waneyên rezimanê kurmancî [Les cours de la grammaire du kurmandji], Weşanên Welat, Istanbul, 192 p.
Thackston, W.M. (2006). Kurmanji Kurdish: a reference grammar with selected
readings. Iranian Studies at Harvard University [online]. Available at: [URL]
Traugott, E. and Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional
changes, Oxford University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Bouveret, Myriam, Françoise Gallez & Manon Hermann
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
