In:Give Constructions across Languages
Edited by Myriam Bouveret
[Constructional Approaches to Language 29] 2021
► pp. 147–173
Chapter 6
Aoj ‘give’ in Khmer
Meaning extensions and construction types
Published online: 10 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.29.06cor
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.29.06cor
The lexeme for give in Khmer, aoj, is highly polyfunctional (Robert 2004, Heine 2013, Do-Hurinville & Hancil 2015) and it frequently occurs in verb serialization (Durie 1997, Aikhenvald & Dixon 2006) :
Jau:k
take
samla:
soup
tev
go
aoj
give
chkae
dog
si:
eat
tev !
then
‘Give the soup to the dog, then!’
In this example we
find three verbs in a row which all serve to describe a single
macro-event (an event of transfer), which gets decomposed in Khmer
into three subevents: “taking the soup,
going somewhere with it and
giving it to the dog.” This pattern of
lexicalization is particularly frequent for verbs describing a path
of motion, and it is often accounted for using both cultural and
cognitive principles (Durie 1997, Vittrant 2015); in this chapter we insist on the cognitive and structural (i.e., constructional)
aspects of the verb aoj. After providing a summary
of the main uses of aoj, our research questions
will be the following: the first and most difficult issue is that of
categorization; according to the function it fulfills in the
clause/sentence, aoj is called a verb (lexical/main
verb, pre-auxiliary verb, causative verb, modal verb, etc.), a
preposition, a conjunction, etc. We need to look for other types of
solutions, and one such solution will be to endorse a constructional
treatment (of aoj) in line with Croft (2013)’s
proposals. This will in turn allow us to explore an important point
raised by Newman (1996)
in his extensive study of give verbs, which is that
the constructional type of the language (namely, the omnipresence of
SVCs) favors the polyfunctionality of aoj, compared
to English give or French donner,
which are far less polysemous. Finally, we tackle the thorny issue
of the meaning contribution of aoj in the
constructions it occurs in.
Keywords:
aoj
,
causative construction
,
light verbs
,
serial verbs
,
polyfunctionality
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Main uses and problems of categorization
- 1.1Ditransitive and benefactive
- 1.2 Causative, permissive
- 1.3 Purposive
- 1.4Causative resultative
- 1.5Other uses
- 2.A case of grammaticalization?
- 2.1Grammaticalization and polyfunctionality
- Benefactive: (V1) AOJ recipient
- Purposive-causative: Subject1GO AOJ subject2 V2
- 2.2“Chesherization”
- 2.1Grammaticalization and polyfunctionality
- 3.Method and discussion
- 3.1Monosemy
- 3.2Transfer as a sanctioning sense
- 3.3Meaning extension to causation and purpose
- 3.4Causative-resultative meaning extensions
- Conclusion
Note References
References (14)
Bisang, Walter (2011). Grammaticalization and the areal factor in East and main
land Southeast Asian languages. [URL]
Brugman, Claudia & Lakoff, George. (2006). Radial network: Cognitive topology and lexical
networks. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic Readings (109–139). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Enfield, Nick J. (2002). Functions of ‘give’ and ‘take’ in Lao complex
predicates. Collected Papers on South-East Asian and Pacific
Languages, Robert S. Bauer (ed.). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: a Construction Grammar Approach to
Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. (2006). Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heiman, John. (2011). Cambodian Khmer. London Oriental and African Language
Library 16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Huffman, Franklin. (1970). Modern Spoken Cambodian. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.
Lakoff, George. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason
based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics I-I. Walter de Gruyter. 39–74.
Michaelis, Laura & Ruppenhofer, Josef. (2001). Beyond alternations: a constructional model of the
German applicative pattern. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Paillard, Denis. (2011). About ʔaɔj in Contemporary
Khmer. Austroasiatic Studies – Papers from ICAAL 4. Mon-Khmer Studies Journal Special Issue n°2, Sophana Srichampa & Paul Sidwell (eds.), 124–137.
Song, Jae Jung. (1998). On the development of MANNER from
give
. In J. Newman (ed.), The Linguistics of Giving. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 327–348.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.. (1990). From less to more situated in language: The
unidirectionality of semantic change.” In S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent, and S. Wright (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English
Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 387–406.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
