Cover not available

In:Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova
[Constructional Approaches to Language 27] 2020
► pp. 1–42

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction

The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar

 | Université de Neuchâtel
 | University of Vienna
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.int
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The nodes
    • 2.1The nature of the node
    • 2.2Node creation vs node-internal changes
  • 3.The links in the network
    • 3.1Vertical links
    • 3.2Horizontal links
    • 3.3Diachronic change as node-external reconfiguration of the network
  • 4.Beyond current network models
  • 5.Range of phenomena
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (96)
References
Audring, J. (accepted). Mothers or sisters? The encoding of morphological knowledge. Word Structure.
Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 900–919). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L. & Gildea, S. (Eds.), (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. & Gildea, S. (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D. & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A. & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and Language Change. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2009). Context and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2012). Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories. What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Cognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 233–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. & Sag, I. A. (Eds.). (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, R., Colleman, T. & Rutten, G. (Eds.). (2014). Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börjars, K., Vincent, N., & Walkden, G. (2015). On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society, 113(3), 363–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, C. & Arista, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003a). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2, (pp. 145–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization. The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, B. (2006). Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions Special 1, 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussé, E., Andersson, P. & Olofsson, J. (Eds.). (2018). Grammaticalization meets construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, A. D. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. (2013). Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. & Cuyckens, H. (2007). Diachronic aspects of complementation: Constructions, entrenchment and the matching-problem. In C. Cain & G. Russom (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language III: Managing chaos: Strategies for identifying change in English (pp. 1–37). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Meola, C. (2000). Die Grammatikalisierung deutscher Präpositionen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2011). Grammaticalization and Language Acquisition. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 130–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 295–321). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G. (2015). Review of: E. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale. (2013). Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 137, 108–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-Based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: a Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fonteyn, L. (2019). Categoriality in Language Change. The Case of the English Gerund. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. J., Kay, P. & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language, 64 (3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, S. L., Bod, R. & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). How hierarchical is language use? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 22, 4522–4531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. (1992). Complexity and complex adaptive systems. In J. Hawkins & M. Gell-Mann (Eds.), The evolution of human languages (pp. 3–18). New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Constructionist approaches to language. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, S. (2018). Derivational morphology in flux. A case study of word-formation change in German. Cognitive Linguistics, 29 (1), 77–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Wortbildungswandel. Eine diachrone Studie zu deutschen Nominalisierungsmustern. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, T., Schmid, H.-J. & Faulhaber, S. (Eds.). (2014). Constructions, Collocations, Patterns. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hieber, D. (2018). Category genesis in Chitimacha. A constructional approach. In K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé & G. Vanderbauwhede (Eds.),. Category Change from a Constructional Perspective (pp. 15–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional Change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In E. Coussé, J. Olofsson, & P. Andersson (Eds.), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar (pp. 21–39). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. & Diessel, H. (2016). Frequency effects in grammar. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. & Audring, J. (2019). Paradigmatic Relations. Workshop proposal for ICCG 11 Antwerp [URL]
Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization – a look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–42). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hüning, M. & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica, 48 (2), 579–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. (1996). The Way Constructions Grow. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. & Audring, J. (2018). Sister schemas in morphology and syntax. Paper at the ICCG10, Paris, France.
Keysar, B. & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the Transparency of Idioms: Can One Keep a Secret by Spilling the Beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34(1), 89–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leino, J. & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Constructions and variability. In M. Fried & H. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots (pp. 191–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, D. (2013a). Contractions of English Semi-Modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency. NIHIN studies. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). From Reduction to Emancipation: Is Gonna a Word? In H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling & S. Oksefjell Ebeling (Eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis (pp. 133–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, F. & Audring, J. (2018). Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory (pp. 365–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M. & Van Goethem, K. (2018). Debonding and clipping of prefixoids in Germanic: Constructionalization or constructional change? In G. Booij (ed.) The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology (pp. 197–240). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A. & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2012). The English It-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, P. (2014). Constructions and environments: Copular, Passive and related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E.; MacClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., Luzondo Oyón, A. & Pérez Sobrino, P. (Eds.). (2017). Constructing Families of Constructions. Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (Ed.). (2016). Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smirnova, E. (2015). Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 81–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deutsche Komplementsatzstrukturen: Synchrones System und diachrone Entwicklung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, L. (2018). Article Emergence in Old English. A Constructionalist Perspective. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Let’s talk face to face about NPN constructions in English. Paper at the ICLC 15, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2011). The pragmatic variable: Toward a procedural interpretation. Language in Society, 40, 343–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T. (2015). On the relation between inheritance and change: The construction network reconfiguration hypothesis. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 173–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2008). The grammaticalization of NP of NP constructions. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and Language Change (pp. 21–43). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2008). Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization. Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48 (2), 557–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Change in category membership from the perspective of construction grammar. A commentary. In K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé & G. Vanderbauwhede (Eds.), Category Change from a Constructional Perspective (pp. 291–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. & Norde, M. (2013). Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. Language Sciences, 36, 32–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Velde, F. (2014). Degeneracy: the maintenance of constructional networks. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 141–179). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K., Norde, M., Coussé, E. & Vanderbauwhede, G. (Eds.). (2018). Category Change from a Constructional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S. (2008). Rethinking Idiomaticity: A Usage-based Approach. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, J. & Gries, S. T. (2016). Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva. (2019). Competition in Language Change.: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (32)

Cited by 32 other publications

Becker, Israela & Mira Ariel
2025. Scaffolding the sentential Ultimate construction into a word. Constructions and Frames 17:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Delaby, Gauthier, Timothy Colleman & Marithé Buysse
2025. Constructional contamination blocking full-fledged alternation? (The lack of) word order variation in Dutch verb clusters with resultative krijgen ‘to get’. Cognitive Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Pena, Yolanda & Javier Pérez-Guerra
2025. An Ecology of Fragmentary Constructions in English: A Corpus-Driven Cognitive Categorisation. In How to Do Things with Corpora [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Claudia
2025. Oh, multimodality where art thou?. Constructions and Frames DOI logo
Liu, Meili, Hubert Cuyckens & Fangqiong Zhan
2025. Language change in a constructional network: the emergence of Mandarin [bi N hai N] comparative constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ruf, Regina & Elena Smirnova
2025.  165Mit Hilfe von Kreativität?. In Dynamics at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte & Axel Bohmann
2025. ‘Not that Tight a Family’ – BIG MESS Constructions in Present Day American English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 73:3 ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte & Florent Perek
2025.  Some as an indefinite article in Present Day English. Functions of Language 32:1 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2025. The development of the Chinese multifunctional construction V+qilai . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Alba-Salas, Josep
2024. Rising datives: tomar ‘take’ expressions with nouns of ‘emotion’ and constructional network reconfiguration in Spanish. Folia Linguistica 58:s45-s1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Erb, Ittamar
2024. Prototypical low-level constructions - experimental evidence for the possessive preposition in Hebrew. CogniTextes Volume 25 DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2024. Un hambre que da calambre. Creativity and extravagance in the context of a family of consecutive constructional idioms. CogniTextes Volume 25 DOI logo
Schneider, Stefan
2024. Construct types in language change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Setzke, Rafael Soto
2024. Linguistic paradigms as cognitive entities: A domain-general approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 12:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Bloom, Barthe
2023. Life at the intersection. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Coussé, Evie, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice
2023. Introduction. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Floret, Mayra França
2023. Construções conclusivas com por isso. Domínios de Lingu at gem 17 ► pp. e1726 ff. DOI logo
Hölzl, Andreas
2023. Diachronic changes in constructional networks. Constructions and Frames 15:2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elena & Vanessa Stöber
2022. Verbo-Nominal Constructions withkommen‘come’ in German. Constructions and Frames 14:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2022. ‘Wonder’ Nouns and the Development of a Mirative Constructional Network: An Exercise in Semiotic Diachronic Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Feng
2022. Review of Diessel (2019): The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 558 ff. DOI logo
Fleischhauer, Jens & Stefan Hartmann
2021. The emergence of light verb constructions. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
2021. Modality in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Martin Hilpert, Ten Lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2021. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 6:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte & Andreas Baumann
2021. Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias
2021. Using structural priming to test links between constructions: English caused-motion and resultative sentences inhibit each other. Cognitive Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias
2024. Vertical and horizontal links in constructional networks. Constructions and Frames 16:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Anneliese Kuhle
2020. Recontextualization and language change. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Structural Priming in the Grammatical Network [Constructional Approaches to Language, 35], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. The Ditransitive Alternation in Present-Day German [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 6], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue