Cover not available

In:Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar
Edited by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson
[Constructional Approaches to Language 21] 2018
► pp. 137–168

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Reduction or expansion? A bit of both

A case study on the development of German degree modifiers

Published online: 23 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c6
Abstract
This paper presents a diachronic analysis of the German quantifier/degree-modifier constructions ein bisschen (‘a bitDIM’) and ein wenig (‘a little’). On the basis of data from two historical corpora, we examine to what extent these constructions followed a grammaticalization path comparable to the one Traugott (e.g. 2008a) observed for their English counterparts. Quantitative analyses on their gradual context expansion are combined with qualitative analyses on potential bridging contexts for reanalysis. Their combined histories suggest that the older German modifiers may have served as attractor sets for an increasingly strengthened mid-level quantifier/degree-modifier schema, promoting the emergence of younger modifiers. These observations stress the crucial role that network links between constructions can play in grammaticalization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Reduction and expansion in a construction grammar framework for grammaticalization
  • 3.English quantifier/degree-modifier constructions
  • 4.German quantifier/degree-modifier constructions: An overview
  • 5.Studying the German degree modifiers: Corpus data and methods
  • 6.Quantitative corpus analyses
    • 6.1Token frequency
    • 6.2Parts of speech modified by the constructions
    • 6.3 Determiner variation
  • 7.Bridging contexts and motivations for innovation
  • 8.Layering, attractor sets and constructional levels
  • 9.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Corpora and sources
  • References
References (74)
Corpora and sources
DeReKo German Reference Corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus), available via COSMAS II, [URL]
DTA German Text Archive (Deutsches Textarchiv), [URL]
DWDS Digital Dictionary of the German Language (Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache), [URL]
Internet Archive [URL]
MED Middle English Dictionary, University of Michigan, [URL]
MHDBDB Middle High German Conceptual Database (Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank), [URL].
T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg, J. Keränen, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi, & M. Palander-CollinPCEEC Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, compiled by T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg, J. Keränen, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi, & M. Palander-Collin (2006), distributed through the Oxford Text ArchiveGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, L. (2007). The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics, 35(4), 293–324. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, L. (2011). Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2003a). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Volume 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2003b). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph, & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Malden: Blackwell. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clerck, B., & Brems, L. (2016). Size nouns matter: a closer look at mass(es) of and extended uses of SNs. Language Sciences, 53, 160–176. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clerck, B., & Colleman, T. (2013). From noun to intensifier: massa and massa’s in Flemish varieties of Dutch. Language Sciences, 36, 147–160. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delorge, M., Plevoets, K., & Colleman, T. (2014). Competing “transfer” constructions in Dutch. The case of ont-verbs. In D. Glynn, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. (2009). Analyzing reanalysis. Lingua, 119, 1728–1755. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. (2014). Does innovation need reanalysis? In E. Coussé, & F. von Mengden (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 296–322). Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H., & Hilpert, M. (2016). Frequency effects in grammar. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrell, M., Ensslin, A., & Bennett, P. (2007). The GerManC Project. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung, 31, 71–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (2010). An iconic analogical approach to grammaticalization. In J. Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Signergy (pp. 279–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (2011). Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 31–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, S., Pleyer, M., Winters, J., & Zlatev, J. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language. Special issue of Interaction Studies .
Haspelmath, M. (1998). Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language, 22(2), 315–351. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2015). From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 113–147. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language Acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(4), 385–401. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? (pp. 21–42). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S. (2004). Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data – and the importance of intuition. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 171–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1 (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluge, F. (2012). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache: Bearbeitet von Elmar Seebold. 25th edition. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krug, M. G. (2000). Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krug, M. G. (2003). Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In G. Rohdenburg, & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English (pp. 7–67). Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (2015). Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (2016). Grammaticalization and automation. Paper presented at the 23rd LIPP-Symposium: Grammatikalisierung in interdisziplinärer Perspektive, Munich, Germany. [URL]
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. (Eds.). (2003). Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfeifer, W. (1993). Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (2011). Grammaticalization and linguistic variation. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 209–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H. (2017). Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0047-y.
Sweetser, E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabor, W., & Traugott, E. C. (1998). Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In A. G. Ramat, & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), The limits of grammaticalization (pp. 227–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiefenbach, H. (1987). -chen und ‑lein. Überlegungen zu Problemen des sprachgeographischen Befundes und seiner sprachhistorischen Deutung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 54(1), 2–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2007). The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 523–557. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2008a). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckhart, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development (pp. 219–250). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2008b). The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 23–45). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2010). Grammaticalization. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 269–283). London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2014). Towards a constructional framework for studying language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 3–21. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularities in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Norde, M. (2013). Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences, 36, 32–46. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verveckken, K. D. (2012). Towards a constructional account of high and low frequency binominal quantifiers in Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 421–478. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verveckken, K. D. (2015). Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Mortal hurryandmortal fine: on the rise of intensifyingmortal. Studia Neophilologica 92:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue