Cover not available

In:Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar
Edited by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson
[Constructional Approaches to Language 21] 2018
► pp. 43–73

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Grammaticalisation cut short

A diachronic constructional view on English posture verbs

Published online: 23 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c3
Abstract
This article provides a corpus-based diachronic constructional analysis of the three English cardinal posture verbs (hence CPVs) sit, stand and lie. Contrary to their equivalents in genetically related languages, the English CPVs have not grammaticalised into locative, progressive, or habitual markers or into copulas. The data reveal some degree of grammaticalisation in the earlier stages which suggests that the grammaticalisation was cut short. The paper evaluates Newman’s (2009) hypothesis that the English CPVs did not further grammaticalise because of their increased use to refer to a dynamic event of getting into a sitting, standing or lying posture. The data also reveal that two (more strongly grammaticalised) copula constructions lingered on much longer, thereby constituting grammaticalised ‘islands’, especially in idiomatic uses.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The unexpected path of English Posture Verbs
    • 2.1 From posture to location and beyond
    • 2.2 From location verb to existential copula
    • 2.3Possible causes for the demise of English posture verbs
  • 3.Corpora and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Locational uses
    • 4.2Copular constructions
      • 4.2.1Quantitative analysis
      • 4.2.2 Qualitative analysis
    • 4.3Putting Newman’s hypothesis to the test
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H. R. (1992). On Frequency, transparency, and productivity. In G. E. Booij, & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992 (pp. 181–208). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H. R., & Lieber, R. (1991). Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 29, 801–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change: Research Surveys in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussé, E. (2018). Grammaticalization, host-class expansion and category change. In K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé, & G. Vanderbauwhede (Eds.), Category Change from a Constructional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal, G., & Namer, F. (2015). La fréquence en morphologie: pour quels usages? Langages, 197, 47–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diller, H., De Smet, H., & Tyrkkö, J. (2011). A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger, 19, 21–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, M., Margetts, A., Meira, S., & Terrill, A. (2007). Four languages from the lower end of the typology of locative predication. Linguistics, 45, 873–892. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization. Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Delfs, L. (2004). Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, T. A. (1999). On ‘sit’/’stand’/’lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics, 37, 191–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kvist Darnell, U. (2008). Pseudosamordningar i svenska, särskilt sådana med verben sitta, ligga och stå. PhD dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2002). The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In J. Newman (Ed.), The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying (pp. 103–139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005a). Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 17, 183–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Motion and location: toward a cognitive typology. In G. Girard-Gillet (Ed.), Parcours linguistiques. Domaine anglais (pp. 223–244). Publications de l’Université St Etienne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005c). Aspectually induced lexical loss in English. In First International AFLiCo Conference From gram to mind: grammar as cognition. Université de Bordeaux 3, France, 20–22 May.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Caused posture: experiential patterns emerging from corpus research. In Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. (Eds.) Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 261–296). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). A Tale of Two Progressives. In A. Makarova, Dickey, S. M. & Divjak, D. S. (Eds.) Thoughts on Language: Studies in Cognitive Linguistics in Honor of Laura A. Janda (pp. 175–194). Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, M., & Perrez, J. (2010). On the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch: a corpus-based study. Cognitive Linguistics 21, 315–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2014). Une grammaticalisation ratée? Une étude diachronique de stand en anglais. Anglophonia, 18. [URL]; 10.4000/anglophonia.327.
(2015). Zit je te denken of ben je aan het piekeren? Persistentie in het synchrone gebruik van de PREP- en POS-progressiefconstructies in het Nederlands [Persistence in the synchronic use of PREP- and POS progressives in Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 20, 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maisak, T. A. (2002). Tipologija grammatikalizacii konstrukcij s glagolami dvizhenija i glagolami pozicii [Grammaticalization paths of motion and posture verbs]. Philological Faculty Dissertation, Completed Degree, Moscow State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, J. (2002). A cross-linguistic overview of Posture verbs ‘sit’, ‘stand’ and ‘lie’ In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). English posture verbs: an experientially grounded approach. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 30–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, J., & Rice, S. (2006). Patterns of usage for English sit , stand, and lie: A cognitively-inspired exploration in corpus linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 351–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O. E. D. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary. Electronic edition (also available online).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, P. (2012). General Productivity: How become waxed and wax became a copula. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 28–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). EEBO Corp Concodancer 1.5. [URL].
Plag, I. (1999). Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, A. (2011). On the productivity of verbal prefixation in English: synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serra Borneto, C. (1996). Liegen and stehen in German: A study in horizontality and verticality. In E. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods (pp. 458–505). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Walker, J. A. (2009). The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language, 85, 321–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Oosten, J. (1984). Sitting, Standing, Lying in Dutch: A Cognitive Approach to the Distribution of the Verbs Zitten, Staan, and Liggen. In J. Van Oosten, & J. Snapper (Eds.), Dutch linguistics at Berkeley (pp. 137–160). Berkeley: UCB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamagushi, T., & Newman, J. (2002). Action and state interpretation of ‘sit’ in Japenese and English. In J. Newman (Ed.), The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying (pp. 43–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Nykiel, Jerzy
2025. Does English have grammaticalized progressive pseudo-coordination?. In The Progressive Revisited [Studies in Language Companion Series, 236], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2024. Looking differently at locative events: the cognitive impact of linguistic preferences. Language and Cognition 16:3 ► pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane
2022. Exploring the conceptualisation of locative events in French, English, and Dutch: Insights from eye-tracking on two memorisation tasks. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane
2025. Seeing and Speaking: the modulation of attention on locative events. CogniTextes Volume 26 DOI logo
Newman, John
2022. Experiential motivation and the linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:4 DOI logo
Fanego, Teresa
2020. On the History of the English Progressive Construction Jane came whistling down the street. Journal of English Linguistics 48:4 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue