Cover not available

In:Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar
Edited by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson
[Constructional Approaches to Language 21] 2018
► pp. 277–311

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A Radical Construction Grammar approach to construction split in the diachrony of the spatial particles of Ancient Greek

Some theoretical preliminaries

Published online: 23 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c10
Abstract
Within the context of a Radical Construction Grammar approach to grammaticalization, this paper presents construction split as a model of the diachrony of spatial particle constructions from Proto-Indo-European to Ancient Greek, accounting for the behaviour of Greek preposition and prefix constructions. The paper discusses some theoretical preliminaries for the RCG approach and for long-term construction developments, with special reference to phenomena in Ancient Greek. An argument is made for central tenets of RCG: there is no structure external to language-specific constructions; language change is fundamentally a matter of degree and ultimately dependent on the pragmatics of discourse; constructions are defined in terms of cues. This is framed in a conceptual discussion on the complementarity of grammaticalization and construction perspectives.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A RCG approach to the units of grammatical change
    • 2.1Utterances as constructions, constructions as cues
    • 2.2Deconstructing syntactic relations: Adjacency, agreement, linear order
  • 3.Construction split
    • 3.1Preliminaries
    • 3.2Some phonological underpinnings of grammaticalization
    • 3.3A grammaticalization mechanism for split
    • 3.4Split of adpositions and affixes
  • 4. The diachrony of the spatial particle constructions in Ancient Greek
    • 4.1Spatial particles in Proto-Indo-European
    • 4.2Construction developments in Ancient Greek
    • 4.3Grammaticalization of aspectuality in discourse
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (93)
References
Bakker, E. J. (2010). Pragmatics: Speech and Text. In E. J. Bakker (Ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language (pp. 151–67). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89(1), 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G., & van Kemenade, A. (Eds.). (2003). Yearbook of Morphology 2003: Preverbs. New York: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1961). Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1988). The development of English aspectual systems: aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunel, J. (1939). L’aspect verbal et l’emploi des préverbes en grec, particulièrement en Attique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bubenik, V. (2007). On the evolution of the Greek prepositional system from Proto-Indo-European local adverbs and adpositions. In G. K. Giannakis et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics. University of Ioannina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2004). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1953). Grammaire homérique. Tome II: syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatterjee, R. (1982). On Cross-Linguistic Categories and Related Problems. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics (pp. 335–345). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 273–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(manuscript) Exemplar semantics. Draft, September 2007. Retrieved on 9 October 2017 from [URL]
(2008). On iconicity of distance. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 49–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, F. (2011). Coordination, not control, is central to movement. In A. Esposito et al. (Eds.), Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces. Theoretical and Practical Issues (pp. 243–255). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debrunner, E., & Schwyzer, A. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. Bd. II: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbrück, B. (1893). Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, Erster Theil. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1952). Greek Prose Style. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, H. (1995). Word order in Ancient Greek: A pragmatic account of word order variation in Herodotus. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1960). Greek word order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunkel, G. E. (2014). Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, G. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee, & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 432–448). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, A. (1999). What, if Anything, is Phonological Iconicity? In M. Nänny, & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form miming meaning (pp. 125–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (1999). On the Role Played by Iconicity in Grammaticalisation Processes. In M. Nänny, & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form miming meaning (pp. 251–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). The pragmatics of word order: Predictability, importance and attention. In M. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik, & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology (pp. 243–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Isomorphism in the grammatical code. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 47–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Syntax: an introduction. Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonda, J. (1948). Quelques observations sur l’emploi de verbe simple ‘au lieu d’un composé’ etc. dans la langue sanskrite. Acta Orientalia, 20, 167–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, A. (1981). Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1998). Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in language, 22(2), 315–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008a). Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Reply to Haiman and Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 59–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Framework-free grammatical theory. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 341–365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hessinger, J. J. (1978). The syntactic and semantic status of prepositions in Greek. Classical Philology, 73(3), 211–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J., & Hudson, R. (2005). Constructions in word grammar. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 243–272). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979b). Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse in Discourse and Syntax. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Phonogenesis. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155–75). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. C. (1981). Space and time in Homer. Prepositional and adverbial particles in the Greek epic. Salem, NH: Ayer Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Sensorimotor Adaptation of Speech I: Compensation and Adaptation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(2), 295–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2007). Der Zwang zur Kategorienbildung: Probleme der Anwendung der Construction Grammar bei der Analyse gesprochener Sprache. Gesprächsforschung–Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 8, 22–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, L., Endresen, A., Kuznetsova, J., Lyashevskaya, O., Makarova, A., Nesset, T., & Sokolova, S. (2013). Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty: prefixes as verb classifiers. Bloomington, Indiana: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2001). Spoken language variability: Implications for modeling speech perception. In R. Smits, J. Kingston, T. M. Nearey, & R. Zondervan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification (SPRAAC). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved on 9 October 9 2017 from [URL]
(2007). Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In S. Maria-Josep, P. Speeter Beddor, & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology (pp. 25–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krug, M. G. (2001). Frequency, iconicity, categorization: Evidence from emerging modals. In J. Bybee, & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 309–335). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuningas, J., & Leino, J. (2006). Word orders and construction grammar. In M. Suominen et al. (Eds.), A Man of Measure: Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday (pp. 301–309). Turku: Linguistic Association of Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1990). Some reflections on the IPA. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 74, 61–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. (2011). A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse markers in English. Linguistics, 49(2), 415–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, F. (1991). Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language, 67(3), 475–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindblom, B., Guion, S., Hura, S., Moon, S. J., & Willerman, R. (1995). Is sound change adaptive? Rivista di linguistica, 7, 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, D. (2012). On-going change in English modality: Emancipation through frequency. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 169(43), 33–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). From reduction to emancipation: is gonna a word? In H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling, & S. Oksefjell Ebeling (Eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis (pp. 133–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonell, A. A. (1916). A Vedic grammar for students. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marin, S., & Pouplier, M. (2010). Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: Testing the predictions of a gestural coupling model. Motor Control, 14(3), 380–407.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melchert, H. C. (2009). Local Adverbs in Hittite: Synchrony and Diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(2), 607–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, K. (1992). Pragmatic phonetics. Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing, 2, 17–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1990). There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. Journal of phonetics, 18(2), 153–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rousseau, A. (1995). Les préverbes dans les langues dʹEurope: introduction à lʹétude de la préverbation. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, R., Baker, R., & Hawkins, S. (2012). Phonetic detail that distinguishes prefixed from pseudo-prefixed words. Journal of Phonetics, 40(5), 689–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatham, M. (1990). Cognitive phonetics. Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing, 1, 193–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatham, M, & Morton, K. (2006). Speech production and perception. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thelin, N. B. (Ed.). (1990). Verbal aspect in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vamling, K. (1989). Complementation in Georgian. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vihman, M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45(4), 683–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viti, C. (2008a). From space words to transitive markers: the case of ancient Greek en ‘in’. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106, 375–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Coding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung, 121, 114–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1963). Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica, 6, 1–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1967). An Indo-European Construction in Greek and Latin. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 71, 115–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011). The making of the Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Schneider, Stefan
2024. Construct types in language change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Lorenz, David
2020. Converging variations and the emergence of horizontal links. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue