Cover not available

In:Category Change from a Constructional Perspective
Edited by Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé and Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
[Constructional Approaches to Language 20] 2018
► pp. 209–228

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
Category change in construction morphology

Published online: 22 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.08boo
Abstract
Morphological constructions can be formalized as schemas that specify semantic and formal output properties of complex words. Such schemas impose these output properties on their constituent words through various coercion mechanisms. In this article we focus on coercion-by-override and the concomitant category change. Our data are mainly from Dutch.
The meaning of a syntactic or morphological construction can override the lexical meaning of a word in that construction. Morphological schemas may therefore change the semantic class of the base word. Semantic coercion may be accompanied by changes in word class.
Morphological schemas may receive a higher degree of productivity within certain syntactic constructions, a phenomenon known as embedded productivity. Thus, morphological schemas contribute to the creativity and flexibility of the language system.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Override constructions
  • 2.Coercion by morphological constructions
    • 2.1Coercion in word formation: change of semantic class
    • 2.2Category change through inflection
  • 3.Construction-dependent morphology and category change
    • 3.1The op het A-e af construction
    • 3.2The aan de [V]N construction
    • 3.3The [voor de N]PP-construction
    • 3.4Category change in verbal constructions
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (18)
References
Audring, J., & Booij, G. (2016). Cooperation and coercion. Linguistics, 54(4), 617–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Lexical integrity as a morphological universal, a constructionist view. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, & A. Bisetto (Eds.), Universals of language today (pp. 83–100). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G., & Audring, J. (2007). Uitgezwaaid en aangezwaaid: Participiumconstructies in het Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12(1), 52–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G., & Hüning, M. (2014). Affixoids and constructional idioms. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 77–105). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H. (2013). The syntax of Dutch: Adpositions and adpositional phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandi, N. (2009). When morphology ‘feeds’ syntax: Remarks on noun adjective conversion in Italian appositive compounds. In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & J. Tseng (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th décembrettes (pp. 111–123). Somerville Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandi, N., Nissim, M., & Tamburini, F. (2011). Noun-clad adjectives: On the adjectival status of non-head constituents of Italian attributive compounds. Lingue e linguaggio, 10(1), 161–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through ‘constructionalization’. Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 579–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauwers, P. (2014). Between adjective and noun: Category/function mismatch, constructional overrides and coercion. In R. Simone, & F. Masini (Eds.), Word classes: Nature, typology and representations (pp. 203–226). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. (2004). Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, A. (2014). The survival and use of case morphology in Modern Dutch. In Boogaart, R., Colleman, T., & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 107–137). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (2013). Lexical relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K. (2015). Cette mesure, est-elle vraiment clé? A constructional approach to categorial gradience. Journal of French Language Studies, 25(1), 115–142.
Van Goethem, K., & Hiligsmann, Ph. (2014). When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch reuze . Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 26(1), 31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Becker, Israela & Mira Ariel
2025. Scaffolding the sentential Ultimate construction into a word. Constructions and Frames 17:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Fajardo, José Antonio Sánchez
2023. A morphopragmatic study of [X-word] constructions through their morphological replicability and pragmatic functions. Lexis :21 DOI logo
Kotowski, Sven
2023. Modeling locative prefix semantics. A formal account of the English verbal prefix out-. Morphology 33:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Audring, Jenny
2022. Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Batiukova, Olga
2021. Compositional mechanisms and selectional constraints in syntax and word formation. The Linguistic Review 38:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Diez-Arroyo, Marisa
2020. The pragmatics of luxury. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 83 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
2018. Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue