In:Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 173–212
On the relation between inheritance and change
The Constructional Convergence and the Construction Network Reconfiguration Hypotheses
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.06tor
This work addresses the relation between inheritance and change in the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar. Given that change is commonly thought of as a linear unidirectional path and inheritance relations tend to be organized in a multidirectional radial fashion, I propose two hypotheses to account for the way new constructions emerge in a language and their relation to existing constructions. The Constructional Convergence Hypothesis claims that historically unrelated constructions can come to participate in the same formally and functionally motivated network of constructions. Such participation results from a series of changes that merge the form and meaning of the new construction into an already existing pattern. The Construction Network Reconfiguration Hypothesis then proposes that, as new constructions emerge, inheritance relations in construction networks change. The change drives speakers to propose new links between constructions regardless of linear relationships. To demonstrate the validity of this claim, I develop an analysis of constructions from the Para Infinitive family of constructions in Brazilian Portuguese, based on extensive data collection from the 13th to the 21st century. The analyses show that speakers seem to have reconfigured the Para Infinitive construction network as far back as the 13th century. Since then, the emergence of new patterns has led to the expansion of the network and the reconfiguration of its inheritance links.
References (51)
Barbosa, A., & Lopes, C.R. (2003). Corpus diacrônico do Rio de Janeiro: cartas pessoais – séculos XVIII-XIX. Retrieved from [URL]
. (Eds.). (2006). Críticas, queixumes e bajulações na Imprensa Brasileira do século XIX: cartas de leitores e cartas de redatores. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53–104.
Braga, M.L., & Paiva, C. (2011). Gramaticalização e Gramática de Construções: Estabilidade e Instabilidade no Uso de Orações Complexas de Causa em Tempo Real. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 51–70.
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cunha, A.G. (1986). Dicionário Etimológico Nova Fronteira da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Davies, M., & Ferreira, M. (2006-). Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300-1900. Retrieved from [URL]
Dias, N.B. (2006-). Corpus Fala Mineira: O Português Falado na Região de Juiz de Fora e Arredores. Available under request to the organizer.
. (2010) As Cláusulas de Finalidade no Português do Brasil: uma proposta. In M.J. Marçalo, M.C. Lima-Hernandes, E. Esteves, M. do C. Fonseca, O. Gonçalves, A.L. Vilela, & A.A. Silva (Eds.), Anais do II Simpósio Mundial de Estudos de Língua Portuguesa (pp. 152–171). Évora: Universidade de Évora.
Fillmore, C.J. (2008). Wherewithal: eine verborgene Konstruktion. In A. Stefanowitsch, & K. Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik (pp. 279–283). Tübingen: Stauffenburg
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1989). From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica, X (1-2), 287–310.
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–607). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (1993/2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C.J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s x doing y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehmann, Ch. (1982 [2002]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.
Lewis, C.T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin Dictionary – founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Martelotta, M.E.T. (2011). The conclusive clause in Portuguese: An approach combining grammaticalization theory and construction grammar theory. Letras & Letras, 27(1), 15–38.
Nöel, D. (2007). Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14(2), 177–202.
Noonan, M. (1985[2007]). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd Edition (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perrochat, P. (1932). Recherches sur La Valeur et L’Emploi de L’Infinitif Subordonné en Latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rezende, T.C.C. (2006). Dinâmica do Contato Dialetal: Estudo sociolingüístico em Conceição de Ibitipoca – MG. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Rodrigues, A. (2011). Sobre a emergência de construções: Evidências Translinguísticas. Letras & Letras, 27(1, 111–126.
Salomão, M.M.M. (1990). Polysemy, aspect and modality in Brazilian Portuguese: the case for a cognitive explanation of grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley.
. (2007). The metaphoric grounding of grammar: The modal construction with ‘give’ in Brazilian Portuguese. In
The 33rd Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society
. University of California, Berkeley.
Sigiliano, N. (2012). Evidências translinguísticas da metáfora de movimento na construção de aspecto inceptivo. Linguística, 8(1), 33–48.
Silveira, S.B., Gago, P., & Dias, N.B. (2004-). Corpus PROCON – Juiz de Fora. Available under request to the organizers.
Sweetser, E.E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In
Proceedings of The Fourteenth Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society
, University of California, Berkeley.
Talmy, L. (1981). Force dynamics.
Conference on language and mental imagery
. University of California, Berkeley.
Torrent, T.T. (2009). A Rede de Construções em Para (SN) Infinitivo: uma abordagem centrada no uso para as relações de herança e mudança construcionais. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Traugott, E.C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra, (Eds.), Variation, selection, development – Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2010). Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Velloso, M.M. (2007). Um Estudo da Idiomatização da Construção Modal com O Verbo Dar no Português do Brasil. MA Thesis in Linguistics. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora.
Xavier, M.F., Crispim, M. de L., & Vicente, G. (1999-). Dicionário de Verbos do Português Medieval. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Grabski, Maciej
Béchet, Christophe & Lieselotte Brems
Czulo, Oliver, Alexander Willich, Alexander Ziem & Tiago T. Torrent
2023. A multilingual approach to the interaction between frames and constructions. Constructions and Frames 15:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Wu, Xia & Yicheng Wu
2023. Review of Sommerer & Smirnova (2020): Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 15:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Bouso, Tamara
KALTENBÖCK, GUNTHER & ELNORA TEN WOLDE
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
Zehentner, Eva
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020. Putting connections centre stage in diachronic Construction
Grammar. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 317 ff.
Flach, Susanne
2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 45 ff.
Gyselinck, Emmeline
2020. (Re)shaping the constructional network. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 107 ff.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia, Chiara Naccarato & Erica Pinelli
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020. Introduction. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2020. Constructionalization, constructional competition and
constructional death. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 69 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 21 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Ely Edison da Silva Matos, Ludmila Lage, Adrieli Laviola, Tatiane Tavares, Vânia Gomes de Almeida & Natália Sigiliano
2018. Towards continuity between the lexicon and the constructicon in FrameNet Brasil. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 107 ff.
Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman
2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 55 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
