Cover not available

In:Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 81–106

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Constructionalization and constructional change

The role of context in the development of constructions

 | Leibniz Universität Hannover
Published online: 30 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi
In recent constructional approaches to language change, the distinction between constructionalization and constructional changes has been made (cf. e.g. Rostila 2004; Noël 2007; Traugott & Trousdale 2013; Traugott this volume). The term constructionalization generally refers to the formation of new constructions, while diverse changes in existing constructions are labeled as constructional changes. This chapter focuses on the impact of context in the development of new constructions. It proposes to model constructionalization as a gradual accumulation of contextual restrictions followed by a structural reorganization of language material, whereby pieces of relevant contextual information are integrated into a new construction type. Two case studies and some further examples from the literature will demonstrate how the proposed model accounts for the development of new constructions from different domains of grammar.
References (51)
References
Askedal, J.O. (1984). Grammatikalisierung und Auxiliarisierung im sogenannten ‚bekommen/kriegen/erhalten-Passiv‘ des Deutschen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 22, 5–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Grammatikalisierung und Persistenz im deutschen Rezipienten-Passiv mit bekommen/kriegen/erhalten . In T. Leuschner, T. Mortelmans, & S. De Groodt (Eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen (pp. 211–228). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bader, M. (2012). The German bekommen passive: A case study on frequency and grammaticality. Linguistische Berichte, 231, 249–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2009). Context and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Languages 82(4), 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Cacoullos, R.T. (2009). The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 university of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Symposium on Formulaic Language (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, S. (2012). Cognitive explanations, distributional evidence, and diachrony. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 645–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1998). Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 151–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. (2012). The course of actualization. Language, 88, 601–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G. (1997). Grammatikalisierung: Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions. Special Volume 1: Constructions all over - case studies and theoretical implications. [[URL]]
. (2008). The catalytic function of constructional restrictions in grammaticalization. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y.-M. Shin, Y. Nishina, & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Studies on grammaticalization (pp. 219–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. (2010). Evidentiality in German. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Paradigmatic integration: The fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2008). Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), 47–79.
. (2009). Representing contextual factors in language change: Between frames and constructions. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), 63–94.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, A., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In G. Trousdale, & Th. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 458–477). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N.P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization - A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. (1996). The way constructions grow. In A.L. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, T. (2004). Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leirbukt, O. (1997). Untersuchungen zu bekommen-Passiv im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rostila, J. (2004). Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlsson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. [URL].
Smirnova, E. (2006). Die Entwicklung der Konstruktion würde + Infinitiv im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stathi, K. (2010). Is German gehören an auxiliary? The grammaticalization of the construction gehören + participle II. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 323–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1977). Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 141–177). Austin, Texas: University of Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Richard, B.D. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G. (2010). Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2008). Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. Konig (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 51–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Theory and data in diachronic construction grammar: The case of the what with construction. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 576–602.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegener, H. (1985). ‘Er bekommt widersprochen‘: Argumente für die Existenz eines Dativpassivs im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, 96, 127–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (26)

Cited by 26 other publications

Liu, Meili
2025. Modeling a network of the ba-constructions in Contemporary Mandarin. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Schneider, Stefan
2024. Construct types in language change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
BYBEE, JOAN
2023. What Is Usage‐Based Linguistics?. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Habermann, Mechthild
2023. The German geschweige denn construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
2023. The semiotics of motion encoding in Early English: a cognitive semiotic analysis of phrasal verbs in Old and Middle English. Semiotica 2023:251 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Haihua Pan
2023. The development of the Chinese VdeO cleft construction. Studies in Language 47:2 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Peter Petré
2022. On the probability and direction of morphosyntactic lifespan change. Language Variation and Change 34:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elena & Vanessa Stöber
2022. Verbo-Nominal Constructions withkommen‘come’ in German. Constructions and Frames 14:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
White, Nathan M.
2022. Grammaticalization and phonological reidentification in White Hmong. Studies in Language 46:1 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva & Marianne Hundt
2022. Prepositions in Early Modern English argument structure and beyond. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Prévost, Sophie
2021. Évolution de la position du sujet en français : une approche constructionnelle. Langue française N° 209:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Flach, Susanne
2020. Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini
2020. Individuality in syntactic variation: An investigation of the seventeenth-century gerund alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020. Introduction. In Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2020. The development of the Chinese expressive zhenshide: A diachronic constructional approach. Lingua 248 ► pp. 102981 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2022. A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse markerběnlái. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2025. Re-evaluating the dynamics of subjectification, intersubjectification, and textualization from a constructional perspective. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana
2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización delograr/conseguir+ infinitivo. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Elena
2015. When secondary grammaticalization starts: a look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 47 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39:2 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copulashìconstruction. Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A constructional account of the loss of the adverse avertive schema in Mandarin Chinese. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue