Cover not available

In:Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical:
Edited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 1–9

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Canonical and non-canonical subjects in constructions

Perspectives from cognition and discourse

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.01hel
References (18)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R.M.W. Dixon, & Masayuki Onishi (Eds.). (2001). Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Achard, Michel (1998). Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin and New-York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam (2005). A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 475–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, & Östman, Jan-Ola (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa (2001). Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward (1976). Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna (2008). Impersonalization from a subject-centered vs. agent-centered perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106, 115–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018. The participants as objects: Variation And Meaning Of First‐ And Second‐Person Object Encoding In Spanish. Studia Linguistica 72:3 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue