Cover not available

In:Non-Nuclear Cases
Edited by Nicole Delbecque, Karen Lahousse and Willy Van Langendonck
[Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 6] 2014
► pp. 217–318

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Passive Voice and Causal Roles in Spanish

Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.6.07del
This paper focuses on oblique variation in the passive. It relies on insights on causal modeling to study the construction types available to express a passive or medio-passive meaning in Spanish. Oblique variation is argued to fulfill an important function in the profiling of the relation between agent and patient, causer and causee, affectant and affectee. The choice of the preposition is shown to function as a device for agenthood management. Based on distributional evidence, the systematic survey of representative corpus examples with the four most frequent prepositions (por ‘by, through’, en ‘in’, de ‘of, from’ and con ‘with’) sheds light on issues related to the prototypicity and nuclearity of participant relations in passive and medio-passive construals.
References (82)
References
Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. “El sintagma adjetival. Modificadores y complementos del adjetivo. Adjetivo y participio.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 217-310. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia. 1981. Story of Over. MA thesis, University of California at Berkeley. (Published in 1988 as The story of Over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1981. Estructuras sintácticas transitivas en el español actual. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conti Jiménez, Carmen. 2004. Papeles semánticos (instrumento y comitativo). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornelis, Louise H. 1997. Passive and perspective. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Semantics categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Event structure in argument linking.” In The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, ed. by Miriam Butt, and Wilhelm Geuder, 21-63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse, 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Kock, Josse, and Carmen Gómez Molina. 1990. Las formas pronominales del verbo y la pasiva. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1984. “Notes on Agentivity and Causation.” Studies in Language 8 (2): 181-213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole. 1996. “Towards a Cognitive Account of the Use of the Prepositions Por and Para in Spanish.” In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene Casad, 249-318. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “A construction grammar approach to transitivity in Spanish.” In The Nominative/Accusative. Case and Grammatical Relations across Language Boundaries, ed. by Kristin Davidse, and Béatrice Lamiroy, 81-130. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “La variable expresión del agente en las construcciones pasivas.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica LI 2: 373-416.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Verbos de respuesta: análisis léxico-construccional.” In Estudios de Lingüística: El verbo, ed. by José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia, and Carmen Marimón Llorca, 119-165. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “El análisis de corpus al servicio de la gramática funcional y cognoscitiva. Hacia una interpretación de la alternancia lineal sujeto-verbo/verbo-sujeto.” In Variación sintáctica en español: un reto para las teorías de la sintaxis, ed. by Gabriele Knauer, and Valeriano Bellosta von Colbe, 51-74. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Spanish (de)queísmo: part/whole alternation and viewing arrangement.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 51-84. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole, and Béatrice Lamiroy. 1996. “Towards a typology of the Spanish dative.” In The Dative. Descriptive Studies, ed. by William Van Belle, and Willy Van Langendonck, 73-117. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole. 1999. “La subordinación sustantiva: Las subordinadas enunciativas en los complementos verbales.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 1965-2081. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeMello, George. 1997. “Verbo pronominal con por + agente.” In Lengua escrita y habla culta en América y España, ed. by Josse De Kock, and George DeMello, 127-133. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 2977-3060. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. “Thematic protoroles and argument selection.” Language 67 (3): 547-619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1987. “The discourse basis of ergativity.” Language 63: 805–852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador. 1986. Gramática española. 4. El verbo y la oración. Volumen ordenado y completado por I. Bosque. Madrid: Arco / Libros S.A.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame semantics.” In Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin. Reprinted in Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (2006), ed. by D. Geeraerts, 373-400. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “The Mechanisms of Construction Grammar.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 35-55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Kay O'Connor. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.” Language 64 (3): 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, Erica. 1975. The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: the Spanish Pronoun System. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/American Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Miguel, José María. 1995. Las relaciones gramaticales entre predicado y participantes. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. “Introducing Cognitive Linguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 3-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. The pragmatics of voice: functional and typological aspects. Reader 2, IFOTT lectures Amsterdam, May 24-28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, John N. 1975. “On the Frequency of Passive Constructions in Modern Spanish.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 52 (4): 345-362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56 (2): 251-299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. “Passive in the world's languages.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol.1 (Clause Structure), ed. by T. Shopen, 243-281. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitillä, Seippo. 2002. “Remarks on the basic transitive sentence.” Language Sciences 24: 107-130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1977. “Linguistic Gestalts.” Papers form the Thirteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society , 236-287.
. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1982. “Space Grammar, Analysability, and the English Passive.” Language 58 (1): 22-80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991b. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “A dynamic usage-based model.” In Usage-based models of language, ed. by Michael Barlow, and Suzanne Kemmer, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W., and Pamela Munro. 1975. “Passives and their meaning.” Language 51: 789-830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 1995. “Prototypicality and Agenthood in Indo-European.” In Historical Linguistics 1993. Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16-20 August 1993, ed. by Henning Andersen, 259-268. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Syncretism and the classification of semantic roles.” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54/1: 35-51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1991. Natural language and universal grammar. Essays in linguistic theory, volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maldonado, Ricardo. 1999. A media voz. Problemas conceptuales del clítico se. México: UNAM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Objective and subjective datives.” Cognitive Linguistics 13 (1): 1-65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, Mª Antonia. 1979. Las construcciones pronominales en español. Paradigma y desviaciones. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999a. “Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 1575-1633. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999b. “Construcciones con se: Medias, pasivas e impersonales.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 1631-1722. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishida, Chiyo. 1994. “The Spanish Reflexive Clitic se as an Aspectual Class Marker.” Linguistics 32 (3): 425-458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yoshiki. 1993. “Agentivity in cognitive grammar.” In Conceptualizations and mental processing in language, ed. by Richard A. Geiger, and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 487-530. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Premack, David, and Ann James Premack. 1995. “Intention as psychological cause.” In Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate, ed. by D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A.J. Premack, 185-199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles. Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1996. Constructions and the Syntax-Discourse Interface. University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, Günter. 1985. “Spatial metaphors underlying prepositions of causality.” In The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought, ed. by W. Wolf Paprotte, and R. Dirven, 177-207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. s.d. Banco de datos CREA (Corpus de referencia del español actual). <[URL]> [on line consultation October 2008 - September 2010].
Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2002. Las construcciones con se. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Izchak M. 1995. Cognitive space and linguistic case. Semantic and syntactic categories in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. “Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis.” Language 61: 821-848. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1988. Passive and Voice (Typological Studies in Language, Volume 16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force dynamics in language and cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 49-100. (Expanded version published in Leonard Talmy 2000, 409-470.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 19952. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. “Remarks on transitivity.” Journal of Linguistics 21: 385-396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandeloise, Claude. 1986. L'espace en francais. Paris: Editions Du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Methodology and Analysis of the Preposition in.” Cognitive Linguistics 5 (2): 157-184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy. 2007. “Iconicity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 394-418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Oosten, Jeanne. 1986. The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents: A Cognitive Explanation. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria. 2007. “A usage-based approach to prototypical transitivity.” In On Interpreting Construction Schemas. From Action and Motion to Transitivity and Causality, ed. by Nicole Delbecque, and Bert Cornillie, 17-38. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2005. “Relevance theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Gregory L. Ward, and Laurence R. Horn, 607-632. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A.M. 1987. “Constructions in monostratal syntax.” Papers from the 23rd Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 389-401.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2022. Grammatical Coding and the Discursive Construction of Participants: Spanish Passives in Written Press News Discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:3 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2025. “No se puede ser más tonto”. In Beyond Binaries in Address Research [Topics in Address Research, 6], ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Cock, Barbara De & Daniel Michaud Maturana
2017. Discursive construction of human rights violations: the case of the Chilean Rettig report. Text & Talk 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue