In:The Genitive
Edited by Anne Carlier and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
[Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 5] 2013
► pp. 255–298
Word order restrictions in adnominal constructions
The case of the German pre- versus postnominal genitive
Published online: 17 July 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.5.10cam
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.5.10cam
This paper focuses on variation between pre- and postnominal genitives of proper names in German. It refines and completes previous studies, in that it provides a systematic corpus study of all factors described in the existing literature and offers a thorough analysis of factors that may hamper genitive variation. The two constructions are not ‘equivalent’, since (1) the prenominal genitive has a specifying, determinative function, (2) certain factors exclude variation and (3) a variety of other factors hamper the alternation in so-called ‘choice’ contexts, such as the semantic factor ‘Agent/Patient role’, the syntactic factor of prosodic weight and a number of pragmatic factors like minor relevance of N1, further elaboration of N2, contrastive meaning, and higher participant identifiability of the genitive proper noun.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Ackermann, Tanja
2019. Possessive -s in German. In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 27 ff.
Ackermann, Tanja
2021. Pre- and postnominal onymic genitives in (Early) New High German. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:3 ► pp. 499 ff.
Caro Reina, Javier & Jessica Nowak
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
