In:Sociocultural Aspects of Translating and Interpreting
Edited by Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger † and Zuzana Jettmarová
[Benjamins Translation Library 67] 2006
► pp. 143–150
Translation as discursive import
Changes in the transfer of proper nouns in Latvian
Published online: 10 August 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.67.18zau
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.67.18zau
Global communication is giving rise to unprecedented movements not only of goods, services, capital and people but also cultural facts,
which become “common property”. Proper nouns for people and places now rank among the most shared items in the globalizing world.
Traditionally, the Latvian language has used phonetic-based transcription as the basic strategy for representing foreign proper nouns.
Under the new circumstances, however, transcription is proving to be inadequate. Analysis of the Latvian translations of Dorling
Kindersley travel guides shows that a variety of transfer procedures are being used, including non-translation, transcription,
calque, semi-calque, deletion, and different combinations of these operations. Translators thus emerge as active agents who have a
considerable say about linguistic and cultural processes. At the same time, these translations show traces of post-national, globalized
blending and hybridity. As it becomes harder to draw the line between the national and the international, so it becomes more difficult to
distinguish between translation and non-translation.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Butkuvienė, Karolina & Lolita Petrulionė
Gînsac, Ana-Maria & Mădălina Ungureanu
Gînsac, Ana-Maria & Mădălina Ungureanu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
