Cover not available

In:Translating Asymmetry – Rewriting Power
Edited by Ovidi Carbonell i Cortés and Esther Monzó-Nebot
[Benjamins Translation Library 157] 2021
► pp. 35–54

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Negotiating asymmetry

The language of animal rights and animal welfare

ORCiD logo with link | University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Published online: 16 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.157.02sal
Abstract
Growing public concern about animal welfare, notably in the context of widespread industry-led exploitation of animals and abusive breeding and slaughtering practices, is increasingly politicised and the shift of focus from the concept of animal welfare to that of animal rights, from compassion to ethics, is framed in an increasingly vocal political discourse. Described as “the fastest social movement” (Gaarder 2011), animal activism has achieved a global dimension where translation plays a significant albeit under-researched role in constructing and disseminating a discourse of animal welfare and contributing to “the social construction of animals” (Stibbe 2001). Drawing on Schicktanz’s (2006) discussion of asymmetry and ambivalence in the context of the human-animal relationship, the paper will explore how, with a backdrop of greater convergence between philosophical and scientific perspectives, concepts such as sentience, welfare and rights are evolving with reference to non-human animals. Examples will be drawn from European and international institutions’ material and from activist organisations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Articulating the human/non-human animal relationship
  • 3.Politics and the discourse on animal welfare and animal rights
  • 4.Welfare, sentience and rights – cross-linguistic and cross-cultural issues
    • 4.1Animal sentience
    • 4.2Animal rights
  • 5.Translation as engagement, translators as activists
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Animal Protection Index. 2020. [URL] (last accessed March 2020).
Animal Welfare Committee (AWC). 2020. [URL] (last accessed April 2020).
Animal Welfare in the EU. 2018. Special Report (31). [URL] (last accessed March 2020).
[URL]. 1998–2020. “Working for a Peaceful World for Humans, Animals and the Environment.” [URL]
Animal Ethics. 2020. “Outreach and Research in Defense of Animals.” [URL]
Animal Welfare Committee. n.d. “Animal Welfare Committee (AWC).” UK Government. Accessed 20 March 2020. [URL]
Beschorner, Thomas, and Thomas Hajduk. 2017. “Responsible Practices are Culturally Embedded: Theoretical Considerations on Industry-Specific Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 143 (4): 635–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boéri, Julie. 2012. “Translation/Interpreting Politics and Praxis.” The Translator 18 (2): 269–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broom, Donald M. 2014. Sentience and Animal Welfare. Wallingford: CABI. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterfield, Max E., Sarah E. Hill, and Charles G. Lord. 2012. “Mangy Mutt or Furry Friend? Anthropomorphism Promotes Animal Welfare.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (4): 957–960. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1999. The Political Animal. Biology, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cochrane, Alasdair. 2013. “From Human Rights to Sentient Rights.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5): 655–675. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Compassion in World Farming. 2017. “A Victory for the UK Animals.” CiWF. Accessed 20 March 2020. [URL]
Cooke, Steve. 2019. “Betraying Animals.” The Journal of Ethics 23 (2): 183–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronin, Michael. 2017. Eco-translation: Translation and Ecology in the Age of the Anthropocene. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denmark. 2007. Dyreværnsloven [Animal Welfare Law]. [URL]
Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Zoopolis – Une théorie politique des droits des animaux. Translated by Pierre Madelin. Paris: Alma éditeur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunayer, Joan. 2003. “English and Speciesism.” English Today 19 (1): 61–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Ian J. H. 2006. “The Changing Concept of Animal Sentience.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100 (1–2): 11–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egyptian Government. 2014. “Egyptian Constitution.” [URL]
United Kingdom. 2010. Equality Act. [URL]
Eurogroup for Animals. n.d. “The Voice for Animals in Europe.” [URL]
Euronews. 2019. “European Parliament Elections 2019: Animal Welfare Parties Hope to Triple Number of MEPs.” Euronews, 2019, World. [URL]
European Commission. 2007. Attitudes of EU Citizens Towards Animal Welfare. [URL]
European Court of Auditors. 2018. Animal Welfare in the EU: Closing the Gap between Ambitious Goals and Practical Implementation. [URL]
Eyes on Animals. 2020. “Watching out for Their Welfare.” [URL]
Freeman, Carrie P. 2014. Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaarder, Emily. 2011. Women and the Animal Rights Movement. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Pres. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garner, Robert. 1998. “Defending Animal Rights.” Parliamentary Affairs 51 (3): 468–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, Rebecca Ruth, and Kayvan Tahmasebian (eds). 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Activism. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandin, Temple. n.d. “Dr. Temple Grandin’s Website. Livestock Behaviour, Design of Facilities and Humane Slaughter.” [URL]
Greer, Allen. 2013. “Exploitation of Language in the Name of Animal Welfare.” The Drum, ABC News, 2013, Opinion. [URL]
Guillaume, Astrid. 2014. “Animal; “être sensible” unaniment désensibilisé. Sémiotique du sensible.” Revue trimestrielle de la Fondation Droit Animal, Ethique et Sciences 81: 35–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IFAW. 2020. Appel à propositions: Un(e) consultant(te) (statut indépendant) pour le programme Wildlife Cyber-Spotter d’IFAW. International Fund for Animal Welfare. [URL]
Ilcan, Suzan, and Anita Lacey. 2013. “Networks of Social Justice: Transnational Activism and Social Change.” Studies in Social Justice 7 (1): 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Robert C. 2015. “Animal Rights is a Social Justice Issue.” Contemporary Justice Review 18 (4): 467–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkwood, James K. 2006. “The Distribution of the Capacity for Sentience in the Animal Kingdom.” In Animals, Ethics and Trade. The Challenge of Animal Sentience, ed. by Jacky Turner and Joyce D’Silva, 12-26. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaudy, Kinga, and Krisztina Károly. 2005. “Implicitation in Translation: Empirical Evidence for Operational Asymmetry in Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 6 (1): 13–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L214 éthique & animaux. 2019a. “L214 assignée en justice pour avoir montré la mise à mort des animaux.” BLOG L214 éthique & animaux (blog). [URL]
. 2019b. “Législation sur la protection animale.” BLOG L214 éthique & animaux (blog). [URL]
Le Monde, and Agence France-Presse. 2020. “L’abattoir Sobeval de Dordogne visé par une enquête préliminaire pour mauvais traitements à animaux.” Le Monde, 10 March 2020, 2020, Planete. [URL]
Linzey, Andrew (ed). 2013. The Global Guide to Animal Protection: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Rowena. 2019. “US Ambassador dismisses UK Criticism over Food Standards.” The Guardian, 6 March 2019, 2019, Trade policy. [URL]
Massey, Gary, and Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow. 2017. “Translating Conceptual Metaphor: The Processes of Managing Interlingual Asymmetry.” Research in Language 15 (2): 173–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McArdle, John E. 1984. “Animal Rights Movement.” Science 225 (4658–4659): 114–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikhail, Alan. 2014. The Animal in Ottoman Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Employment Tribunals. Mr J Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports. Norwich, UK. 2018.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olivier, David. 1992a. “Éditorial.” Les Cahiers antispécistes 3. [URL]
. 1992b. “Éditorial.” Les Cahiers antispécistes 4. [URL]
One Voice. n.d. “One Voice.” [URL]
PAL. n.d. “Palestinian Animal League (PAL). Helping Animals, Empowering People.” [URL]
Palmer, Clare (ed). 2008. Animal Rights. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proctor, Helen S., Gemma Carder, and Amelia R. Cornish. 2013. “Searching for Animal Sentience: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature.” Animals (Basel) 3 (3): 882–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spain. 2020. Real Decreto 452/2020 de 10 de marzo, por el que se desarrolla la estructura orgánica básica del Ministerio de Derechos Sociales y Agenda 2030, y se modifica el Real Decreto 139/2020, de 28 de enero, por el que se establece la estructura orgánica básica de los departamentos ministeriales [Royal Decree 452/2020 of 10 March, developing the basic organisational structure of the Ministry of Social Rights and Agenda 2030, and amending Royal Decree 139/2020 of 28 January, establishing the basic organizational structure of ministerial departments]. [URL]
Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Translated into French by E. Utria (2013). Les Droits des animaux. Paris: Herman ed.: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reus, Estiva. 2005. “Sentience!” Les Cahiers antispécistes 26. [URL]
Schicktanz, Silke. 2006. “Ethical Considerations of the Human–Animal-Relationship Under Conditions of Asymmetry and Ambivalence.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1): 7–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal Liberation. A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals. Translated into French by L. Rousselle (2012). La Libération animale. Petite bibliothèque Payot ed. New York: Ecco Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1993. Animal Rights and Human Morals. The Origins of the Western Debate. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SPARE. 2010. “Society for the Protection of Animal Rights in Egypt (SPARE).” [URL]
Stibbe, Arran. 2001. “Language, Power and the Social Construction of Animals.” Society and Animals 9 (2): 145–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen A. 2017. “Constitutional Innovation and Animal Protection in Egypt.” Law & Social Inquiry 43 (4): 1364–1390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Vegan Muslim Initiative. n.d. “The Vegan Muslim Initiative.” [URL]
Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. 2009. 2007/C 306/01. Lisbon: European Union. [URL]
Turner, Jacky, and Joyce D’Silva (eds). 2006. Animals, Ethics and Trade. The Challenge of Animal Sentience. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 2000. “Translation and Political Engagement: Activism, Social Change and the Role of Translation in geopolitical Shifts.” The Translator 6 (1): 23–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed). 2010. Translation, Resistance, Activism. Amherst, Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1978. Universal Declaration of Animal Rights. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [URL]
United Kingdom. 2006. Animal Welfare Act. [URL]
Villanueva, Gonzalo. 2018. “Animal Rights Without Borders: Lyn White and Transnational Investigative Campaigning.” In The Transnational Activist, ed. by Stefan Berger and Sean Scalmer, 311–338. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiedenmann, Rainer E. 1998. “Die Fremdheit der Tiere. Zum Wandel der Ambivalenz von Mensch-Tier-Beziehunge [The strangeness of animals. The transformation of the ambiguity of the relationships between humans and animals].” In Tiere und Menschen, ed. by Paul Münch, 351–382. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wise, Steven M. 1993. Rattling the Cage. Towards Legal Rights for Animals. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, Michaela. 2012. “The Sociology of Translation and its “Activist Turn”.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 7: 129–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
World Animal Net. n.d. “World Animal Net.” [URL]
World Animal Protection. n.d. “Animal Protection Index.” Accessed 2 March 2020. [URL]
World Society for the Protection of Animals. 2014. Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wrenn, Corey Lee. 2016. A Rational Approach to Animal Rights. Extensions in Abolitionist Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wang, Hui
2022. Conceptualizing Mediation in Translation. In Discursive Mediation in Translation, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue