Article published In: Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter: Band 24
Herausgegeben von Manuel Baumbach und Olaf Pluta
[Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 24] 2021
► pp. 1–17
Antiochus’ and Cicero’s different theories of memory in the Lucullus
Published online: 7 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00070.hos
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00070.hos
Abstract
The essay deals with an important epistemological debate in the Lucullus: Can there be remembrance of false beliefs, as Cicero argues against his interlocutor, who defends Antiochus’ position? It is shown that Antiochus, like Aristoteles, considers ‘remember’ to be a double achievement verb: Remembrance occurs only if a correct past perception is faithfully transmitted to the present. Cicero, on the other hand, insists that faithful transmission can also occur with false beliefs. The distinction seems to be analogous to that between valid and sound inference in contemporary Stoic logic. Finally, I discuss differences between ancient and modern forms of skepticism, address the issue of why misremembering plays no role in the Lucullus, and find an answer in Cicero’s doctrine of the orator.
Article outline
- I.
- II.
- III.
- Notes
Bibliography
References (36)
Jonathan Barnes. Antiochus of Ascalon, in: Philosophia togata, ed. by Mitaim Griffin and Jonathan Barnes, Oxford, 51–96 1989.
Sven Bernecker/Kourken Michaelian. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory, Abingdon/New York 2017.
M. Tulli Ciceronis. Scripta quae manserunt omnia, Fasc. 42: Academicorum reliquiae cum Lucullo, rec. O. Plasberg, Leipzig 1922.
. Scripta quae manserunt omnia, Fasc. 45: De natura deorum, post O. Plasberg ed W. Ax, Stuttgart 1961.
Marcus Tullius Cicero. Hortensius. Lucullus. Academici Libri, lateinisch-deutsch, edited, translated and commented by Laila Straume-Zimmermann, Ferdinand Broemser, and Olof Gigon, München/Zürich 1990.
E. R. Dodds. Review of: Willy Theiler, Die Vorbereitung des Neuplatonismus, Berlin 1930, in: Gnomon 71, 307–310 1931.
. Review of: Ludwig Fladerer, Antiochos von Askalon. Hellenist und Humanist, in: Gnomon 741, 289–295 2002.
Katerina Ierodiakonou. The Stoics and the Skeptics on Memory, in: Tracce nella mente. Teoria della memoria da Platone ai moderni, ed. by Maria Michela Sassi, Pisa, 47–65 2007.
Adolf Lörcher. Das Fremde und das Eigene in Ciceros Büchern De finibus bonorum et malorum und den Academica, Halle/Saale, Reprint Hildesheim 1975 1911.
Dmitri Nikulin. Memory in Ancient Philosophy, in: Memory. A History, ed. by Dmitri Nikulin, Oxford, 35–84 2015.
Tobias Reinhardt. Linguistic Naturalism in Cicero’s Academica, in: Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, ed. by Giuseppe Pezzini and Barnaby Taylor, Cambridge, 153–170 2019.
