Cover not available

Article published In: Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter: Band 23
Herausgegeben von Manuel Baumbach und Olaf Pluta
[Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 23] 2020
► pp. 1–32

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cratylus 439D3–440C1

Its texts, its arguments, and why it is not about forms

 | University of Lisbon
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00054.nor
Abstract
Some interpreters take the arguments at Cratylus 439D3–440C1 to argue for Forms. Some interpreters also believe that these arguments are elliptical or contain lacunae. I accept that the arguments are elliptical. However, I deny that they contain lacunae. I present the most natural construal of the text and argue that it neither trades on Forms nor postulates Forms. To make my case, I show that Cratylus 439D3–440C1 has a modest end, which is to refute a particular notion of flux.
Article outline
  • 1.The context
  • 2.Introduction to the arguments
  • 3.The arguments
    • 3.1The first argument
    • 3.2The second argument
    • 3.3The third argument
    • 3.4The fourth argument
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Ademollo, F. 2011. The Cratylus of Plato. A commentary, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ast, F. 2012. Lexicon Platonicum sive Vocum Platonicarum index Vol. 11, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailly, M. A. 1933. Dictionnaire Grec-Français, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2001. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus, New York and London. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bostock, D. 1988. Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brownson, C. L. (trans.), 1922. Xenophon. Xenophon in Seven Volumes 31, Cambridge MA and London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calvert, B. 1970. “Forms and flux in Plato’s Cratylus” in: Phronesis 151, 26–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. J. 1968–1970. Dictionnaire Étymologique de la Langue Grecque, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1954. The Greek Particles, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duke, E. A., W. F. Hicken, W. S. M. Nicoll, B. D. Robinson, and J. C. G. Strachan (eds.), 1995. Platonis Opera I1, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ficino, M. (trans.), “Platonis Sophista”, in: Bekker (ed.), 1826. Platonis Scripta Graece Omnia 101, London, 340–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1993. On Ideas. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gemöll, G. 1991. Griechisch-Deutsches Schul-Handwörterbuch, München.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1888. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1935, 1985. Plato’s Thought, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gulley, N. 1962. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heindorf, L. F. 1802. Dialogi Selecti, Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1806. Platonis Dialogi Tres Cratylus, Parmenides, Euthydemus, Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, J. V. 1965. “The Theory of Ideas in the Cratylus”, in: Phronesis 10, 1, 21–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, Ch. 1973. “Language and Ontology in the Cratylus”, in: Lee, Mourelatos, Rorty (eds.), Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos. Assen, 152–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühner, R. 1904. Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechische Sprache II1, Hannover and Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leisegang, H. 1950. “Platon”, in: G. Wissowa (ed.), Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft XX, 2, Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutoslawski, W. 1983. Origin and Growth of Plato’s Logic, Mildesheim, Zürich, New York. Reprint of London, New York, Bombay 1897.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magnien, V. 1969. Dictionnaire Grec-Français, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, A. W. 1918. “General Relative Clauses in Greek”, in: The Classical Review 32, 7/8, 169–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mckenzie, M. M. 1986. “Putting the Cratylus in its Place”, in: The Classical Quarterly 36, 1, 124–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meridier, L. 1961. Platon, Ouvres Complètes V, 21, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995. Vocabulario Della Lingua Greca, Torino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1993. Plato, Phaedo, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schanz, M. (ed.), 1887. Platonis opera quae feruntur omnia 3, Sophista, Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1978. What Plato Said, Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. 1917. “General Relative Clauses in Greek”, in: The Classical Review 31, 3/4, 69–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smyth, H. W. 1920. Greek Grammar, Harvard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, E. A. 1918. “The Indicative in Relative Clauses”, in: The Classical Review 32, 3/4, 68–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, N. 1976. Plato on Knowledge and Reality, Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue