Article published In: Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter: Band 21
Herausgegeben von Manuel Baumbach und Olaf Pluta
[Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 21] 2018
► pp. 49–84
‚David Armenius philosophus‘
Carl Friedrich Neumanns Verdienste um die Entdeckung der spätantiken Philosophie Armeniens
Article language: German
Published online: 8 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00023.jec
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00023.jec
Abstract
At the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the
Latin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is
increasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The
historical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to
late antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th
century. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the
orientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel,
learned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available
Armenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical
mind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he
traced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great
relevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on
Aristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however,
does not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for
Western scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.
Article outline
- 1.Einleitung
- 2.Spurensuche
- 2.1Von Gessner bis Montfaucon
- 2.2Johann Gottlieb Buhle
- 2.3Jacopo Morelli
- 2.4Sukias Somal
- 3.C. F. Neumanns Weg zur armenischen Geistesgeschichte
- 3.1Studium bei Creuzer und Hegel in Heidelberg
- 3.2Frühe Forschungen zu Aristoteles
- 3.3Armenische Studien bei den Mechitaristen in Venedig
- 3.4Anregungen in Paris
- 4.Neumans David-Monographie von 1829
- 5.Schwerpunkte der David-Monographie Neumanns
- 5.1Die unbefriedigende Ausgangslage
- 5.2Neumann über Davids Biographie und Kontext
- 5.3Das angebliche philosophische Hauptwerk Davids
- 5.4Neue Erkenntnisse zu Aristoteles’ Esoterica und Exoterica
- 5.5Neue Erkenntnisse zum Platonismus: Plotins ägyptische Herkunft
- 6.Neumanns Projekt: Scheitern und Abbruch
- Anmerkungen
