Cover not available

In:Language Processing in Advanced Learners of English: A multi-method approach to collocation based on corpus linguistic and experimental data
Marco Schilk
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 9] 2020
► pp. 281–290

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 14 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.9.ref
Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E. & Kornblum, S. 1989. Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye-movements: characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3): 529–543.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, E. P. & Vago, R. M. 2004. The role of grammaticality judgments in investigationg first language attrition. In First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues [Studies in Bilingualism 28], M. S. Schmid, B. Köpke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (eds), 105–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amosova, N. N. 1963. Osnovy anglijskoj frazeologij. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andor, J. 2006. The master and his performance: An interview with Noam Chomsky. International Journal of Pragmatics 1: 93–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ardal, S., Donald, M. W., Meuter, R., Muldrew, S. & Luce, M. 1990. Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals. Brain and Language 39: 187–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aston, G. & Burnard, L. 1998. The BNC Handbook. Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. 2005. Computer-based analysis of learner language. In Analysing learner language, R. Ellis & G. P. Barkhuizen (eds), 335–357. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E. 2003. Natura e cultura nel linguaggio (On the nature and nurture of language). I. Frontiere della biologia (Frontiers of Biology). Il cervello di Homo sapiens (The Brain of Homo Sapiens), E. Bizzi, P. Calissano & V. Volterra (eds), 241–265. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana fondata da Giovanni Trecanni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berglund-Prytz, Y. 2007. British National Corpus, Version 3 (BNC XML edn). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besson, M., Kutas, M. & van Petten, C. 1992. An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition in sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4(2): 132–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M. & Prieto, T. 1997. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience 17(1): 353–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. E., Milberg, W. & Shrier, R. 1982. Semantic processing in aphasia. Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Brain and Language 17(2): 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brand, C. & Kämmerer, S. 2006. The Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage: Compiling the German component. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, S. Braun, K. Kohn & J. Mukherjee (eds), 127–140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Roots. Linguistics in Search of its Experimental Base, S. Featherson & W. Sternefeld (eds), 75–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan J. & Hay, J. 2008. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2): 245–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifton, C., Straub, A. & Rayner, K. 2007. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill (eds), 341–373. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. 2001. DRC: A dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108(1): 204–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. 1981. The treatment of collocations and idioms in learners’ dictionaries. Applied Linguistics 2(3): 223–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Introduction. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, A. P. Cowie (ed.), 1–20. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruden, A. 1737. A Complete Concordance to the Holy Scriptures. London: Private print.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daudaravičius, M. & Marcinkevičienė, R. 2004. Gravity counts for the boundaries of collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(2): 321–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deacon, D., Mehta, A., Tinsley, C. & Nousak, J. M. 1995. Variations in the latencies and amplitudes of N400 and NA as a function of semantic priming. Psychophysiology 32(6): 560–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dien, J., Frishkoff, G. A. & Tucker, D. M. 2000. Differentiating the N3 and N4 electrophysiological semantic incongruity effects. Brain & Cognition 43: 148–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. 2005. Bilingual lexical word recognition and lexical access. In Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches, J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds), 179–201. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimigen, O. W., Sommer, A., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, M. & Kliegl, R. 2011. Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses & review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140(4): 552–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunning, T. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P. & Schmitt, N. 2009. To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Journal of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47: 157–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. 2010. Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 149–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Frey, E. & Jalkannen, I. 2009. The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (1) – Lexical access (89–116). In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Roemer & R. Schulze (eds), 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Frey, E. 2009. The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (2) – Affective priming (473–498). In Formulaic Language, Vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psycholinguistic Reality, and Functional Explanations [Typological Studies in Language 83], R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. M. Wheatley (eds), 473–498. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evert, S. 2008. Corpora and collocations. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö. (eds), 1212–1248. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Mai, H. & Kutas, M. 2005. Both siders get the point: Hemispheric sensitivity to sentential constraint. Memory and Cognition 2005(33): 871–886. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., Marchman, V. A. 2008. Looking while listening: using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-Line Methods in Children’s Language Processing [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 44], I. A. Sekerina, E. M. Fernández & H. Clahsen (eds), 97–135. Amsterdam: Johan Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A., Müller, K. & von Cramon, D. Y. 2002. fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(1): 11–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J. & Field, Z. 2012. Discovering Statistics using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. 1982. Problems of assembling and computerizing large language corpora. In Processing Computer Corpora in English Language Research, S. Johansson (ed.), 7–42. Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis W. N. 1992. Language corpora B.C. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics, J. Svartvik (ed.), 17–34. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis W. N. & Kučera, H. (compilers). 1964. The Brown Corpus. Available through International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (ICAME). <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. 2004. Lost in parallel concordances. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds). Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds), 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50(3): 259–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(2): 78–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. & Kotz, S. A. 2003. The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. NeuroImage 20(S1): 8–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E. & Hahne, A. 1993. Event related potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1(3): 183–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. & Weissenborn, J. 2007. Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research 1146: 50–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gast, V. 2008. Verb-noun compounds in English and German. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 56(3): 269–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. 2010. Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. T. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the art review. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Shortall, T. 2007. Reconciling corpus data and elicitation data in FLT. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL 2007), M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston & P. Danielsson (eds), 12–27. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gläser, R. 1986. Phraseologie der Englischen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, J. 1990. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language 29(2): 228–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. 2003. The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 538–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. & Bestgen, Y. 2014. The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 52(3): 229–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F., Paquot, M. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM, Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. 2006. Some proposals towards more rigorous corpus linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 191–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahne, A. 2001. What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Psychological Research 30(3): 251–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahne, A. & Friederici, A. D. 2002. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research 13: 339–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1966. Lexis as a Linguistic Level. In Memory of J.R. Firth, C. E. Bazell, J. C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday & R. H. Robins (eds), 148–163. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4: 237–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 2006. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage 30(4): 1383–1400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hillyard, S. A. & Kutas, M. 1983. Electrophysiology of cognitive processes. Annual Review of Psychology 34: 33–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S. 2007. From web-page to mega-corpus: The CNN transcripts. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 69–85. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. & Berglund-Prytz, Y. 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, P. A. 1996. Phraseology in English Academic Writing: Some Implications for Language Learning and Dictionary Making. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 23–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W. & McCarthy, G. 2014. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 3rd edn. Sunderland MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. 2002. Pattern grammar, language teaching and linguistic variation. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9], R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (eds), 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inhoff, A. W. & Radach, R. 1998. Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception, G. Underwood (ed.), 29–53. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäkel, O. 2010. The Flensburg English Classroom Corpus (FLECC): Sammlung authentischer Unterrichtsgespräche aus dem aktuellen Englischunterricht auf verschiedenen Stufen an Grund-, Haupt-, Real- und Gesamtschulen Norddeutschlands. Flensburg: Flensburg University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. 2000. Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning 50(2): 245–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review 87(4): 329–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99(1): 122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemper, S., Crow, A. & Kemtes, K. 2004. Eye-fixation patterns of high- and low-span young and older adults: Down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging 19(1): 157–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G. 2003. Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational Linguistics 29(3): 333–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrz, P. & Tugwell, D. 2004. The Sketch Engine. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Euralex International Congress, Lorient, France, 6–10 July, Geoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier (eds), 105–116. Lorient: Université de Bretagne-Sud.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. & Suchomel, V. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, S. G., Ashe, J., Georgopoulos, A. P., Merkle, H., Ellerman, J. M., Menon, R. S., Ogawa, S. & Ugurbil. K. 1993. Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. Journal of Neurophysiology 69(1): 297–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G. 2009. Awful adjectives: A type of semantic change in present-day corpora. In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, A. Renouf & A. Kehoe (eds), 437–449. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M. & Engbert, R. 2004. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye-movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16(2): 262–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreyer, R. 2014. The Marburg Corpus of Intermediate Learner English (MILE). In Language Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70], M. Callies & S. Götz (eds), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. 1994. Category inferences in translation and picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language 33(2): 149–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Tokowicz, N. 2005. Models of bilingual representation and processing: Looking back and to the future. In Handbook of Bilingualism, J. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds), 531–553. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N. & Green, D. W. 2010. The revised hierarchical model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(3): 373–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, New Series 207(4427), 203–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307: 161–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Waldmann, T. 2011. Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61(2): 647–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2007. New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 133–149. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Garside, R. & Bryant, M. 1994. CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Coling 1994, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Compational Linguistics, 2 Vols, 622–628. Kyoto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, M. R. & Titone, D. A. 2009. Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35(2): 381–390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, G. 1999. Adjective Intensification - learners versus native speakers: a corpus study of argumentative writing. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, R., Bembry C., Hardy A. & McEnery, T. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014 – Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, C. D. & Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maguire, M.J., Magnon, G., Ogiela, D.A., Egbert, R., Sides, L. 2013. The N300 ERP component reveals developmental changes in object and action identification. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 1-9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Wilson A. 1996. Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melʹčuk, I. A. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany NY: State University of Ney York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, C. F. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E. & Ellis, G. B. 1970. Parallel processes in word-recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E. & Schvanefeldt, R. W. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words; evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90(2): 227–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milberg, W. & Blumstein, S. E. 1981. Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language 14(2): 371–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molfese, D. L. & Molfese, V. J. 1997. Discrimination of language skills at five years of age using event-related potentials recorded at birth. Developmental Neuropsychology 13(2): 135–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinaro, N. & Carreiras M. 2010. Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectations and semantic integration during the processing of collocations. Biological Psychology 83(3): 176–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, E. 1977. Caught in the Web of Words. James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R. & DeCarrico, J. S. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. 2003. The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics 24(2): 223–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholls, D. 2003. The Cambridge Learner Corpus – Error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference (CL 2003), D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (eds), 572–581. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R. & Tank, D. W. 1990. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. PNAS 87(24): 9868–9872. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H. & Kakigi, R. 2005. An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(8): 1212–1228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C. & Molinaro, N. 2006. Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning 56(s1): 199–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M. & Granger, S. 2012. Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 130–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds), 191–25. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge IV, S. P. & Underwood, G. 1999. The influence of focus operators in syntactic processing of short relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology – Section A 52(3): 717–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulmann, S., Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C. & Kotz, S. A. 2006. Is bilingual lexical access influenced by language context? Neuroreport 17(7): 727–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radach, R. & Kennedy, A. 2004. Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16(1): 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K. 1984. Visual perception in reading, picture perception, and visual search – A tutorial. Attention and Performance 10: 67–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3): 372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K. & Duffy, S. A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition 14(3): 191–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R. & Clifton Jr., C. 1989. Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4(3–4): SI21–SI49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rispens, J. & Krikhaar, E. 2010. Using event-related potentials in language acquisition research. In Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research [Language Learning & Language Teaching 27], E. Blom & S. Unsworth (eds), 95–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, U. 2007. Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. In Anglistentag 2006 Halle. Proceedings, S. Volk-Birke & J. Lippert (eds), 355–363. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. & Wallace, R. 1970. The comparison of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86(2): 144–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilk, M. 2006. Collocations in Indian English: A corpus-based sample analysis. Anglia 124(2): 276–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar. A Corpus-based Study. PhD dissertation, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen.
2011. Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilk, M., Mukherjee, J., Nam, C. & Mukherjee, S. 2013. Complementation of ditransitive verbs in South Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(2): 187–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A. & Kuperman, V. 2018. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 44(3): 421–439.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S. & Adolphs, S. 2004. Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In Formulaic Sequences. Acquisition, Processing and Use [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], N. Schmitt (ed.), 127–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgement and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedivy, J. C. 2010. Using eyetracking in language acquisition research. In Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research [Language Learning & Language Teaching 27], E. Blom & S. Unsworth (eds), 115–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sereno, S. C. & Rayner, K. 2003. Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7(11): 489–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K. & Posner, M. I. 1998. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye-movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport 9: 2195–2200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Pereyra, J. F. & Carreiras, M. 2007. An ERP study of agreement features in Spanish. Brain Research 1185(2007): 201–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. 1987 (Ed.). Looking up. An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Preface. In Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger & F. Meunier (eds), xv–xviii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., Jones, S. & Delay, R. 1970[2004]. English lexical studies: Report to OSTI on project C/LP/08. In English Collocation Studies. The OSTI Report, J. M. Sinclair, S. Jones & R. Daley (eds). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sitnikova, T., Holcomb, P. J., Kiyonaga, K. A. & Kuperberg, G. R. 2008. Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(11): 2037–2057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N. 2011. Adding more fuel to the fire: an eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research 27(2): 251–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2009. Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Vernacular Universals and Language Contact, M. Filppula, J. Klemola & H. Paulasto (eds), 33–55. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinbügl. B. 2005. Deutsch-englische Kollokationen: Erfassung in zweisprachigen Wörterbüchern und Grenzen der korpusbasierten Analyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2009. Technology and phraseology – With notes on the history of corpus linguistics. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], U. Römer & R. Schulze (eds), 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stuellein, N., Radach, R. R., Jacobs, A. M. & Hofmann, M. J. 2016. No one way ticket from orthography to semantics in reccognition memory: N400 and P200 effects of association. Brain Research 1639: 88–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderman, G. & Kroll, J. F. 2006. First language activation during second language access: An investigation of lexical form, meaning and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(3): 387–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K. & Geeraerts, D. 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 225–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N. & Galpin, A. 2004. The eyes have it – An eye movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Formulaic Sequences. Acquisition, Processing and Use [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], N. Schmitt (ed.), 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V. 1947. Ob osnovnych tipach frazeologičeskich jedinic v russkom jazyke. In Izbrannyje trudy. Leksikologija i leksikografija, V. V. Vinogradov (ed.), 140–161. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vö, M. L-H. & Wolfe, J. 2013. Differential ERP signatures elicited by semantic and syntactic processing in scenes. Psychological Science 24(9): 1816–1823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. 2000. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37: 190–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, S. 2002. Verbales Arbeitsgedächtnis und die Verarbeitung ambiger Wörter in Wort- und Satzkontexten [MPI Series in Cognitive Neuroscience 33]. Leipzig: MPI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasow. T. & Arnold, J. 2005. Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 115(11): 1481–1496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M. & Neville, H. J. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8:(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wlotko, E. W. & Federmeier, K. D. 2007. Finding the right word: Hemispheric assymetries in the use of sentence context information. Neuropsychologia 45: 3001–3014. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zangl, R. & Fernald, A. 2007. Increasing flexibility in Children’s online processing of grammatical and nonce determiners in fluent speech. Language Learning and Development 3(3): 199–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue