Cover not available

In:Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 205–222

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Working memory and L2 English speakers’ primed and subsequent production of passives

 | Concordia University
 | Georgia State University
Published online: 23 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.10mcd
Abstract
Although first language researchers have investigated the relationship between individual differences and structural priming (Kaschak, Kutta, & Jones 2011; Kidd 2012a, b), fewer studies have explored this relationship in second language (L2) speech production (McDonough, Kielstra, Crowther, & Smith 2016). This chapter describes an empirical study that tested the relationship between English L2 speakers’ (N = 64) primed and subsequent production of passives and working memory. Results indicated a significant positive correlation between the participants’ primed production and working memory scores, but only when no intervening material occurred between prime and target sentences. Furthermore, there was no relationship between their subsequent production of passives and working memory scores. Implications are discussed in terms of dual-account explanations of structural priming.
Article outline
  • 1.Method
    • 1.1Participants
    • 1.2Design
    • 1.3Materials
      • 1.3.1Priming task
      • 1.3.2Baseline and post-priming production task
    • 1.4Working memory test
    • 1.5Procedure
    • 1.6Analysis
  • 2.Results
  • 3.Discussion
  • References
  • Appendix
References (49)
References
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biria, R., Ameri-Golestan, A., and Antón-Méndez, I. (2010). Syntactic priming effects between modalities: A study of indirect questions/requests among Persian English learners. English Language Teaching, 3, 111–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. (2007). Structural persistence from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bringing the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., & Cleland, A. (1999). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 635–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Validating running memory span: Measurement of working memory capacity and links with fluid intelligence. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 563–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F. (2008). Implicit learning as a mechanism of language change. Theoretical Linguistics, 34, 115–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/5, 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, M. J. (1997). Children’s memory scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conroy, M. & Antón-Méndez, I. (2015). A preposition is something you can end a sentence with: Learning English stranded prepositions through structural priming. Second Language Research, 31, 211–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, J., Kerr, B., & Streissguth, A. P. (1995). Correlational analyses of procedural and declarative learning performance. Intelligence, 20, 87–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011–1029. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M. P., & Cohen, N. J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940–946. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gomez, R. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Coyle, J. M. (2014). Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 728–743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Jones, J. L. (2011). Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 1133–1139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012a). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 393–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutta, T., & Kashak, M. (2012). Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming. Acta Psychologica, 141, 408–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Altmann, G., & St Claire, M. (2013). Priming of verb inflections in L1 and L2 French: A comparison of ‘redundant’ versus ‘non-redundant’ training conditions. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 271–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Eliciting wh-questions through collaborative syntactic priming activities during peer interaction. In P. Trofimovich, & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching, and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 131–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, (2014). Using structural priming tasks in an EAP context. Contact, 40(2), 51–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2012). Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 355–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G. (2016). Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 112–131). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Kim, Y. (2009). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 386–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M., & Ferreira, V. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Psychological Corporation. (1997). WAIS-III – WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raven, J. (2004). Coloured Progressive Matrices and Chrichton Vocabulary Scale. London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., & Lieven, E., (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2012). Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 62, 931–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. S. B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 213–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L., & Smith, M. (2003). Phrase structure priming: A short-lived effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 431–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Lee, Andrew H.
2024. The effects of proactive form-focused instruction and individual differences on second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research 28:6 ► pp. 2354 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shaofeng
2024. Individual differences and task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Stephen Skalicky & YeonJoo Jung
2020. The Role of Linguistic Alignment on Question Development in Face‐to‐Face and Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication Contexts: A Conceptual Replication Study. Language Learning 70:3 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, YeonJoo Jung & Stephen Skalicky
2019. LINGUISTIC ALIGNMENT, LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS, AND THE PRODUCTION OF STRANDED PREPOSITIONS IN RELATIVE CLAUSES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5 ► pp. 937 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Carrie N.
2018. Second language structural priming: A critical review and directions for future research. Second Language Research 34:4 ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue