Cover not available

In:Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism
Edited by John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 2] 2016
► pp. 47–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2. Listening with your cohort

Do bilingual toddlers co-activate cohorts from both languages when hearing words in one language alone?

 | Gordon College, United States
 | University of Göttingen, Germany
 | Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
 | Université Paris Descartes, France
 | University of Göttingen, Germany
Published online: 3 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.2.03bob
Bilingual children, like bilingual adults, co-activate both languages during word recognition and production. But what is the extent of this co-activation? In the present study, we asked whether or not bilingual preschool children activate a shared phonological cohort across languages when hearing words only in their L1. We tested German-English children on a cross-modal priming paradigm. To ensure co-activation of languages, children first heard a short code-switch story. Compared to a monolingual control group, bilingual children in Experiment 1 showed only partial sensitivity to the L1 cohort. Bilingual children who did not hear the code-switch story (Experiment 2) showed priming effects identical to the monolinguals in Experiment 1. Results indicate that under single-language contexts, German-English bilingual preschoolers do not activate the non-target language cohort during word recognition but instead restrict cohort activation to the language of input. In contrast, presentation of the non-target language in the code-switch story appears to shift cohort activation and increase L2 activation, suggesting a highly flexible language system that is in tune to the broader linguistic context. We consider mechanisms of bilingual language control that may enable bilingual toddlers to limit cross-language phonological activation.
References (42)
References
Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2009). Lexical–semantic priming effects during nfancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3633-3647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bain, B., & Yu, A. (1980). Cognitive consequences of raising children bilingually: “One Parent, One Language.” Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 304-313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobb, S.C., & Mani, N. (2013). Categorizing with gender: Does implicit grammatical gender affect semantic processing in 24-month-old toddlers? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 297-308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-990. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition, 189-225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elston-Güttler, K.E. An inquiry into cross-language lexical-conceptual relationships and their effect on L2 lexical processing, PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2000.
Elston-Güttler, K.E., & Gunter, T.C. (2009). Fine-tuned: Phonology and semantics affect first-to second-language zooming in. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 180-196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elston-Güttler, K.E., Gunter, T.C., & Kotz, S.A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 57-70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J.P., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J.S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldinger, S.D., Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.B., & Marcario, J.K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K.M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23-45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, D.W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515-530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 467-477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 233-274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & McQueen, J.M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 460-482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P.A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314-318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J.F., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 497-514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, J.F., Bobb, S.C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119-135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Duyck, W. (2013). The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 508-517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, P.A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2008). Phonological priming in infancy. Proceedings of the 30 th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , Washington, USA.
Mani, N., & Plunkett, K. (2010). In the infant’s mind’s ear evidence for implicit naming in 18-month-olds. Psychological Science, 21, 908-913. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Phonological priming and cohort effects in toddlers. Cognition, 121, 196-206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97-115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology,10, 29-63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayor, J., & Plunkett, K. (2014). Infant word recognition: Insights from TRACE simulations. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 89-123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meints, K., & Woodford, A. (2008). Lincoln Infant Lab Package 1.0: A new programme package for IPL, Preferential Listening, Habituation and Eyetracking. [www document: Computer software & manual]. <[URL]>
Morford, J.P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J.F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations?.Cognition, 118, 286-292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. (2001). The matrix language frame model: Development and responses. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 126, 23-58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulmann, S., Elston-Güttler, K.E., Gunter, T.C., & Kotz, S.A. (2006). Is bilingual lexical access influenced by language context?. NeuroReport, 17, 727-731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poarch, G.J., & Van Hell, J.G. (2012). Cross-language activation in children’s speech production: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 419-438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. (2002). DeutscherWortschatz im Internet [Online database]. Leipzig, Germany: University of Leipzig. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297–1311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 304-324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, L.M., & Hamburger, M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Styles, S.J., Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K., (2008). Priming and interference in infancy. In Love, B.C., McRae, K. & Sloutsky V.M., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 651-656.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R.N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13, 480-484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szagun, G., Stumper, B., & Schramm, S.A. (2009). Fragebogen zur frühkindlichen Sprachentwicklung (FRAKIS) und FRAKIS-K (Kurzform). Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Holzen, K. & Mani, N. (2012). Language nonselective lexical access in bilingual toddlers, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 569-586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1-25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bobb, Susan C. & Judith F. Kroll
2018. Words on the brain. In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue