Cover not available

In:Language Acquisition in Romance Languages
Edited by Vicenç Torrens
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 18] 2024
► pp. 1–9

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction

 | National University of Distance EducationMadrid
Published online: 25 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.18.intro
References (16)
References
Baker, M. (2014). Types of cross-linguistic variation in case assignment. In C. Picallo (Ed.), Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework (pp. 36–60). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax, case studies in semitic and romance languages. Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh -questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22, 269–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katsos, N., Cummins, C., Ezeizabarrena, M., Gavarró, A., Kuvač Kraljević, J., Hrzica, G., Grohmann, K. K. (2016). Cross-linguistic patterns in the acquisition of quantifiers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A., 113, 9244–9249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (2000). Parameters and universals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of feature in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 171–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2006). The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 364–375.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodrigues, E., Forster, R., & Corrêa, L. S. (2024). Quantifier comprehension in Brazilian Portuguese and the extra-object visual effect. In V. Torrens (Ed.) Language Acquisition in Romance Languages (pp. 212–229). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue