In:Bilingualism through the Prism of Psycholinguistics: In honour of Albert Costa
Edited by Mikel Santesteban, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia and Cristina Baus
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 17] 2023
► pp. 28–53
Chapter 1Models of language production and the temporal organization of
lexical access
Published online: 1 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.17.01sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.17.01sch
Abstract
This chapter focusses on models of language
production and the temporal organization of the processes involved
in lexical access. Albert Costa contributed significantly to
advancing our understanding of lexical access. Through the
investigation of multilingual speakers, he added an important
dimension to this discussion. Here, we provide a discussion of
discrete and cascaded/interactive accounts of lexical access and
summarize some of the crucial experimental evidence that has been
offered for and against these different theories, roughly over the
years when Albert contributed to these debates. We will also discuss
whether or not lexical selection is competitive and what research on
multilingual speech production contributed to our knowledge on
lexical access. The discussion is mainly restricted to behavioral
data, with some references to electrophysiological studies. We
conclude that considering the experimental evidence a strict version
of discrete processing models is difficult to maintain. Research on
bilingual language production has made important contributions to
the discussion, however, the picture is not yet complete.
Article outline
- 1.Speaking – A complex behavioral skill
- 2.Language production models
- 2.1Discrete models of language production
- 2.2Experimental support for discrete models of speech production
- 2.3Cascaded and interactive models of speech production
- 2.4Experimental evidence for cascaded and interactive models of language production
- 3.Lexical selection
- 4.Summary and conclusions
References
References (119)
Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic
context effects in language production: A swinging lexical
network proposal and a
review. Language and
Cognitive
Processes, 24, 713–734.
Alario, F.-X., Schiller, N. O., Domoto-Reilly, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The
role of phonological and orthographic information in lexical
selection. Brain and
Language, 84, 372–398.
Aristei, S., & Abdel-Rahman, R. (2013). Semantic
interference in language production is due to graded
similarity, not response
relevance. Acta
Psychologica, 144, 571–582.
Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic
facilitation and semantic interference in word translation:
implications for models of lexical access in language
production. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 48, 468–488.
Bock, K. (1995). Sentence
production: From mind to
mouth. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook
of perception and cognition, Vol. 11. Speech, language, and
communication (2nd
ed., pp. 181–216). Academic Press.
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language
production: Grammatical
encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook
of
psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Towards
an articulatory
phonology. Phonology
Yearbook, 3, 219–252.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The
‘tip-of-the-tongue’
phenomenon. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 5, 325–337.
Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical
access in speech
production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical
representation and
process (pp. 108–135). The MIT Press.
Bürki, A., Elbuy, S., Madec, S., & Vasishth, S. (2020). What
did we learn from forty years of research on semantic
interference? A Bayesian
meta-analysis. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 114, 104125.
Caramazza, A. (1997). How
many levels of processing are there in lexical
access? Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208.
Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208.
Costa, A., Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On
the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect
in the picture–word interference
paradigm. Psychonomic
Bulletin and
Review, 12, 125–131.
Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Is
lexical selection in bilingual speech production
language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and
English-Spanish
bilinguals. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 2, 231–244.
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). The
cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of
lexical access. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical
selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two
lexicons compete for
selection? Journal of Memory
and
Language, 41, 365–397.
Costa, A., Pannunzi, M., Deco, G., Pickering, M. J. (2017). Do
bilinguals automatically activate their native language when
they are not using
it? Cognitive
Science, 41, 1629–1644.
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical
access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from
language switching in highly-proficient bilinguals and L2
learners. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 50, 491–511.
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On
the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual
speech production. Brain and
Language, 94, 94–103.
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How
do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization
process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection
mechanisms are both
functional. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 32, 1057–1074.
Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C., & Thierry, G. (2009). The
time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related
brain potentials during overt
speech. Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences, 106, 21442–21446.
Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic
and phonological information flow in the production
lexicon. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 25, 318–344.
Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic
and phonological codes interact in single word
production. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 25, 345–361.
Declerck, M., & Koch, I. (2022). The
concept of inhibition in bilingual
control. Psychological
Review. Advance online publication.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A
spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence
production. Psychological
Review, 93, 283–321.
(1988). The
retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of
predictions from a connectionist
model. Journal of Memory and
Language, 27, 124–142.
Dell, G. S., Nozari, N., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2014). Word
production: Behavioral and computational
considerations. In M. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of language
production (pp. 88–104). Oxford University Press.
Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated
and convergent lexical priming in language production: A
comment on Levelt et al.
(1991). Psychological
Review, 98, 604–614.
Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The
distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference:
Evidence for response
exclusion. Journal of
Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 36, 878–891.
(2011). The
distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture–word
interference task: Further evidence for a late locus of
distractor
exclusion. Psychonomic
Bulletin &
Review, 18, 116–122.
(2012). Lexical
selection and verbal self-monitoring: Effects of lexicality,
context, and time pressure in picture-word
interference. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 66, 163–176.
Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now
you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference
into facilitation in a Stroop-like
task. Cortex, 42, 790–796.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The
analysis of sentence
production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The
psychology of learning and
motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). Academic Press.
(1980). Levels
of processing in sentence
production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language
production: Speech and
talk (Vol. 1, pp. 177–220). Academic Press.
(1982). Production
of speech: Observations from normal and pathological
language
use. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality
and pathology in cognitive
functions (pp. 19–76). Academic Press.
(1988). Processes
in language
production. In E. F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Language:
Psychological and biological
aspects (pp. 69–96). Cambridge University Press.
Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The
time course of picture–word
interference. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 10, 640–654.
Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context
effects in Stroop-like word and picture
processing. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
General, 118, 13–42.
Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited
interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech
error, and neuropsychological
evidence. Language and
Cognitive
Processes, 21, 817–855.
Goldstein, L. & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory
Phonology: A phonology for public language
use. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics
and phonology in language comprehension and
production (pp. 159–208). Mouton de Gruyter.
Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L. A. (2004). What
is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on
tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish–English and
Tagalog–English
bilinguals. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 30, 246–269.
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., Weintraub, S., & Ackerman, N. (1976). The
‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon in
aphasia. Cortex, 12, 145–153.
Green, D. (1998). Mental
control of the bilingual lexico-semantic
system. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 1, 67–81.
Griffin, Z. M., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Properties
of spoken language
production. In M. J. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook
of psycholinguistics (2nd
ed., pp. 21–59). Elsevier.
Guenther, F. H. (2003). Neural
control of speech
movements. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics
and phonology in language comprehension and
production (pp. 209–240). Mouton de Gruyter.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade
processes in picture
identification. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 5, 67–103.
Indefrey, P. (2011). The
spatial and temporal signatures of word production
components: A critical
update. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2, 255.
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The
spatial and temporal signatures of word production
components. Cognition, 92, 101–144.
Jescheniak, J. D., Matushanskaya, A., Mädebach, A., & Müller, M. M. (2014). Semantic
interference from distractor pictures in single-picture
naming: Evidence for competitive lexical
selection. Psychonomic
Bulletin &
Review, 21, 1294–1300.
Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do
perceived context pictures automatically activate their
phonological
code? Experimental
Psychology, 56, 56–65.
Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete
serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in
speech production: Further evidence from coactivation of
near-synonyms. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 24, 1256–1274.
(2001). Priming
effects from phonologically related distractors in
picture-word
interference. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 54A, 371–382.
Kohnert, K. (2004). Cognitive
and cognate-based treatments for bilingual aphasia: A case
study. Brain and
Language, 91, 294–302.
Lashley, K. S. (1951). The
problem of serial order in
behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral
mechanisms in
behavior (pp. 112–146). Wiley.
(1992). Accessing
words in speech production: Stages, processes and
representations. Cognition, 44, 1–22.
(2001). Spoken
word production: a theory of lexical
access. Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences, 98, 13464–13471.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A
theory of lexical access in speech
production. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences, 22, 1–75.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The
time course of lexical access in speech production: a study
of picture
naming. Psychological
Review, 98, 122–142.
MacKay, D. G. (1987). The
organization of perception and action: A theory for language
and other cognitive
skills. Springer.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half
a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative
review. Psychological
Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical
selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of
semantic interference and facilitation effects in the
picture-word interference
paradigm. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 33, 503–535.
Mahon, B. Z., Garcea, F. E., & Navarrete, E. (2012). Picture-word
interference and the response exclusion hypothesis: A
response to Mulatti and
Coltheart. Cortex, 48, 373–377.
Matushanskaya, A., Mädebach, A., Müller, M. M., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2016). When
sufficiently processed, semantically related distractor
pictures hamper picture naming: Implications for models of
lexical access in speech
production. Experimental
Psychology, 63, 307–317.
Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Lexical
selection is competitive: Evidence from indirectly activated
semantic associates during picture
naming. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and
Cognition, 39, 348–364.
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual
language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language
selection. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 40, 25–40.
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When
more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor
frequency in picture–word interference
paradigm. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
General, 132, 228–252.
Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence
for a cascade model of lexical access in speech
production. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 28, 555–563.
Munding, D., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). On
the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the
MEG evidence. Language,
Cognition and
Neuroscience, 31, 441–462.
Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological
activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a
cascade model of lexical
access. Journal of Memory and
Language, 53, 359–377.
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The
dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative
semantic interference during lexical access in speech
production. Cognition, 114, 227–252.
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical
selection and phonological encoding during language
production: evidence for cascaded
processing. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 24, 539–557.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward
a mechanistic psychology of
dialogue. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences, 27, 169–226.
(2013). An
integrated theory of language production and
comprehension. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences, 36, 329–392.
Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature
and response components in a picture-word interference task
with beginning and skilled
readers. Journal of
Experimental Child
Psychology, 24, 440–460.
Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness
and interactivity in spoken word
production. Psychological
Review, 107, 460–499.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A
spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in
speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142.
(2000). WEAVER++
and other computational models of lemma retrieval and
word-form
encoding. In L. R. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects
of language
production (pp. 71–114). Psychology Press.
(2008). Tracing
attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning
using eye movements. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 34, 353–368.
(2018). A
unified computational account of cumulative semantic,
semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in
picture
naming. Cognition, 172, 59–72.
Roelofs, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019). The
architecture of
speaking. In P. Hagoort (Ed.), Human
language: From genes and brains to
behavior (pp. 35–50). The MIT Press.
Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic
semantic processing in a picture–word interference
task. Child
Development, 46, 247–253.
Schiller, N. O. (2006). Phonology
in the production of
words. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of language and
linguistics (pp. 545–553). Elsevier.
(2020). Neurolinguistic
approaches in
morphology. In R. Lieber (Ed.), Oxford
research encyclopedia of
linguistics. Oxford University Press.
(2021). The
mental
lexicon. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford
bibliographies in
linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Schiller, N. O., Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2003). Tracking
the time course of phonological encoding in speech
production: An event-related brain potential study on
internal
monitoring. Cognitive Brain
Research, 17, 819–831.
Schiller, N. O., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2015). Accessing
words from the mental
lexicon. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), The
Oxford handbook of the
word (pp. 481–492). Oxford University Press.
Schiller, N. O. & Verdonschot, R. G. (2019). Morphological
theory and
neurolinguistics. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of morphological
theory (pp. 554–572). Oxford University Press.
Schmitt, B. M., Münte, T. F., & Kutas, M. (2000). Electrophysiological
estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological
encoding during implicit picture
naming. Psychophysiology, 37, 473–484.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring
the time course of lexical access in language production:
picture-word interference
studies. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 29, 86–102.
Schuhmann, T., Schiller, N. O., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2012). Speaking
of which: Dissecting the neurocognitive network of language
production in picture
naming. Cerebral
Cortex, 22, 701–709.
Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A
case-series test of the interactive two-step model of
lexical access: Evidence from picture
naming. Journal of Memory and
Language, 54, 228–264.
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Kroll, J. F. K. (2003). Phonology
in bilingual language processing: Acquisition, perception
and
production. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics
and phonology in language comprehension and
production (pp. 279–317). Mouton de Gruyter.
Spalek, K., Damian, M. F., & Bölte, J. (2013). Is
lexical selection in spoken word production competitive?
Introduction to the special issue on lexical competition in
language production. Language
and Cognitive
Processes, 28, 597–614.
Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On
the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in
word production. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 42, 497–525.
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course
analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in
picture naming. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 22, 896–918.
Starreveld, P. A., La Heij, W., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2013). Time
course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and
categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of
the response exclusion
account. Language and
Cognitive
Processes, 28, 633–654.
Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An
interactive activation model of language
production. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress
in the psychology of
language (pp. 143–186). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011). Riding
the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course
of lexical selection in speech
production. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2, 356.
(2016). The
cortical dynamics of speaking: Present shortcomings and
future avenues. Language,
Cognition and
Neuroscience, 31, 484–503.
Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 912–928.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies
of interference in serial verbal
reactions. Journal of
Experimental
Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological
evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological
processes in speech
production. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 23, 787–806.
(1998). Brain
activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40
milliseconds. Science, 280, 572–574.
Vieth, H. E., McMahon, K. L., & De Zubicaray, G. I. (2014). Feature
overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the
picture–word interference
paradigm. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental
Psychology, 67, 2325–2339.