References (57)
References
Bui, H. Y. G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bui, G., Skehan, P., & Wang, Z. (2018). Task condition effects on advanced level foreign language performance. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 219–237). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 83–104). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral performance. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effect of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 185–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 249–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Lexical diversity and lexical selection: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M. (2009). Hitting the Mark: How can text organisation and response format affect reading test performance. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Speech production and the Cognition Hypothesis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 39–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Q. (2014). Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners’ oral performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 129–154). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007a). Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long, Problems in SLA (pp. 43–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. English Language Teaching Journal, 55, 124–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61, 311–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malicka, A., & Sasayama, S. (April, 2017). The importance of learning from the accumulated knowledge: Findings from a research synthesis on task complexity. Paper presented at the 7th Biennial International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Barcelona, Spain.
Pang, F., & Skehan, P. (2014). Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Performance profiles on second language speaking tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 371–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–122). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2007). Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Form-meaning relationships in language pedagogy: Essays in honour of Rod Ellis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergsleithner, S. N. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). National Foreign Language Center, Hawaii.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Limited attentional capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 123–155). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Tasks vs. conditions: Two perspectives on task research and its implications for pedagogy. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 34–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, and assessment. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). The psycholinguistics of task-based performance. In M. Long & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based learning and teaching (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, pp. 193–216. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning, and teaching. University of Brussels PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., Foster, P., & Shum, S. (2016). Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 54(2), 97–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Shum, S. (2014). Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 197–210). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). What influences performance? Personal style or the task being done? In L. L. C. Wong & K. Hyland (Eds.), Faces of English education: Students, teachers, and pedagogy (pp.28–43). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P. (2004). Oral narrative tasks and second language performance: An investigation of task characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of London.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P. (2014). Structure, lexis, and time perspective: Influences on task performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 155–186). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Skehan, P., & Chen, G. (2019). The effects of hybrid on-line planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Journal of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3, 53–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, E. (1976). Fundamentals of information structure. Hatfield Polytechnic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue