Cover not available

In:Understanding L2 Proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigations
Edited by Eun Hee Jeon and Yo In'nami
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 13] 2022
► pp. 213–233

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 7
L2 listening comprehension

Theory and research

ORCiD logo with link | Temple University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 4 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.13.07wag
Abstract
This chapter examines how L2 listening ability has been modeled and operationalized in the research literature, and provides a critical overview of the dominant models. It also describes how researchers have used both taxonomies of listening skills as well as data-driven approaches to creating models of listening ability. The chapter then provides a critical discussion of how the constructs of L2 listening ability have been operationalized and measured by empirical researchers. The chapter concludes with an analysis of why models and operationalizations of L2 listening ability have often neglected to include or focus on those aspects of language that are unique to listening ability.
Article outline
  • 1.Background: A conceptual introduction to the key constructs and models of L2 listening
    • 1.1Taxonomies and data-driven examinations of L2 listening ability
    • 1.2Models of second language (L2) listening ability
    • 1.3L2 listening, L1 listening, and reading
  • 2.Measurement practices: A critical discussion of how the constructs and their components have been operationalized and measured by empirical researchers
    • 2.1Interactive speaking/listening ability
    • 2.2Differentiating listening from reading
    • 2.3Length of the spoken text
    • 2.4Listening task response
    • 2.5Audio-only versus audio-visual input
    • 2.6Accent and dialect variety
    • 2.7Real-world spoken input
  • 3.Conclusion
  • References
References (65)
References
Aitken, K. (1978). Measuring listening comprehension. English as a second language. TEAL Occasional Papers (Vol. 2). British Colombia Association of Teachers of English as an Additional Language. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED155945)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). FreemanGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aotani, M. (2011). Factors affecting the holistic listening of Japanese learners of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Bernhardt, E., & Kamil, M. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic interdependent hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 15–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (1998). Assessing listening abilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 , 171–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Trace, J. (2018). In G. Ockey & E. Wagner (Eds.), Assessing L2 listening: Moving towards authenticity (pp. 45–63). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8 (1), 67–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension. Language Testing, 11 (2), 145–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G., & Tatsuoka, K. (1998). Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: Examining attributes of a free response listening test. Language Testing, 15 (2), 119–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G., Tatsuoka, K., Kostin, I., & Phelps, M. (1997). The sub-skills of listening: Rule-space analysis of a multiple-choice test of second language listening comprehension. In A. Huhta, V. Kohonen, L. Kurki-Suonio, & S. Luoma (Eds.), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment. Universities of Tampere and Jyvaskyla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3 (3), 229–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carney, N. (2018). Diagnosing L2 bottom-up listening abilities of Japanese university EFL learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Coniam, D. (2001). The use of audio or video comprehension as an assessment instrument in the certification of English language teachers: A case study. System, 29 , 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunkel, P., Henning, G., & Chaudron, C. (1993). The assessment of an L2 listening comprehension construct: A tentative model for test specification and development. The Modern Language Journal, 77 (2), 180–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
East, M., & King, C. (2012). L2 learners’ engagement with high stakes listening test: Does technology have a beneficial role to play? CALICO Journal, 29 , 208–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Cognitive validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening. Research and practice in assessing second language listening (pp. 77–151). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1999). Does the text matter in a multiple-choice test of comprehension? The case for the construct validity of TOEFL’s minitalks. Language Testing, 16 (1), 2–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34 (1), 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilmore. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40 (2), 97–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1992). Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (2), 385–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaacs, T. (2008). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64 (4), 555–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL, 29 , 135–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Schallert, D. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (4), 713–739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14 (1), 41–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The ability to speak: From intentions to spoken words. European Review, 3 (1), 13–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lund, R. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 75 (2), 196–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McBride, K. (2011). The effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24 (2), 131–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49 (3), 207–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F. (2018). Investigating examiner interventions in relation to the listening demands they make on candidates in oral interview tests. In G. Ockey & E. Wagner (Eds.), Assessing L2 listening: Moving towards authenticity (pp. 205–226). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nissan, S., DeVenicenzi, F., & Tang, K. (1996). An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension (TOEFL Research Report No. 51). Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ockey, G. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24 (4), 517–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The degree to which it matters if an oral test task requires listening. In G. Ockey & E. Wagner (Eds.), Assessing L2 listening: Moving towards authenticity (pp. 193–204). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45 (3), 255–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, P. (1991). A synthesis of methods for interactive listening. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 106–122). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 219–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, M. (2008). Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 25 (4), 435–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (1), 6–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension. Language Teaching, 40 (3), 191–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, E. (2002). Video listening tests: A pilot study. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2 (1). Retrieved on 1 May 2019 from [URL]
(2004). A construct validation study of the extended listening sections of the ECPE and MELAB. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 2 , 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Video listening tests: What are they measuring? Language Assessment Quarterly, 5 (3), 218–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010a). Test-takers’ interaction with an L2 video listening test. System, 38 (2), 280–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010b). The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance. Language Testing, 27 (4), 493–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). An investigation of how the channel of input and access to test questions affect L2 listening test performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10 (2), 178–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014a). Using unscripted spoken texts to prepare L2 learners for real world listening. TESOL Journal, 5 (2), 288–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014b). Assessing listening. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 47–63). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Authentic texts in the assessment of L2 listening ability. In J. Banarjee & D. Tsagari (Eds.), Contemporary second language assessment (pp. 438–463). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). A comparison of L2 listening performance on tests with scripted or authenticated spoken texts. In G. Ockey & E. Wagner (Eds.), Assessing L2 listening: Moving towards authenticity (pp. 29–44). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Wagner, S. (2016). Scripted and unscripted spoken texts used in listening tasks on high stakes tests in China, Japan, and Taiwan. In V. Aryadoust & J. Fox (Eds.), Current trends in language testing in the Pacific Rim and the Middle East: Policies, analyses, and diagnoses (pp. 103–123). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Ockey, G. (2018). An overview of the use of authentic, real-world spoken texts on L2 listening tests. In G. Ockey & E. Wagner (Eds.), Assessing L2 listening: Moving towards authenticity (pp. 13–28). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, E. & Toth, P. (2014). Teaching and testing L2 Spanish listening using scripted versus unscripted texts. Foreign Language Annals, 47 (3), 404–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weir, C. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yanagawa, K. (2016). Examining the authenticity of the Center Listening Test: Speech rate, reduced forms, hesitation and fillers, and processing levels. JACET Journal, 60 , 97–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Pastorino-Campos, Carla, Amy Devine & Louise Gilbert
2025. Extra Time as an Access Arrangement in Digital Listening Tasks for L2 Learners with Literacy Difficulties. Language Assessment Quarterly 22:3 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Kormos, Judit, Kathrin Eberharter, Elisa Guggenbichler, Simone Baumgartinger, Viktoria Ebner & Benjamin Kremmel
2024. First Language Literacy Skills, Listening Strategy Use, and Anxiety in Self-Paced versus Single-Play L2 Listening Tests. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:4-5 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Eberharter, Kathrin, Judit Kormos, Elisa Guggenbichler, Viktoria S. Ebner, Shungo Suzuki, Doris Moser-Frötscher, Eva Konrad & Benjamin Kremmel
2023. Investigating the impact of self-pacing on the L2 listening performance of young learner candidates with differing L1 literacy skills. Language Testing 40:4 ► pp. 960 ff. DOI logo
In'nami, Yo, Mike W.‐L. Cheung, Rie Koizumi & Matthew P. Wallace
2023. Examining Second Language Listening and Metacognitive Awareness: A Meta‐Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Language Learning 73:3 ► pp. 759 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue