Cover not available

In:Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning
Edited by Edith Kaan and Theres Grüter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 12] 2021
► pp. 47–68

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Second language prediction ability across different linguistic domains

Evidence from German

 | University of Potsdam
 | University of Potsdam
Published online: 22 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.12.03sch
Abstract
Previous research suggests that second language (L2) speakers can reliably use lexical-semantic cues for predictive processing but have difficulty using morphosyntactic ones. Here we report the results from a visual-world eye-tracking study that tested first language (L1) Russian/L2 German speakers in two parallel experiments, asking whether morphosyntactic prediction is indeed more limited in an L2 compared to semantic prediction. In Experiment 1 both the L2 speakers and L1 German-speaking controls showed evidence of using selectional restriction information to anticipate an upcoming direct object. Unlike what was reported previously, in Experiment 2 the same group of L2 speakers also showed evidence of using morphological case information predictively. However, between-group differences suggested that L2 speakers had more difficulty integrating competing cues during processing than L1 speakers.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Semantic prediction
    • Morphosyntactic prediction
  • The current study
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Design and materials
      • Apparatus and experimental procedure
      • Data analysis procedure
    • Results
      • Truth value judgement and questionnaire data
      • Eye-tracking data
      • Summary
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Word order in German: A corpus study. Lingua, 120(3), 717–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Gann, T. M., & Pierce, R. S. (2011). Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 201–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Grammar overrides frequency: Evidence from the online processing of flexible word order. Cognition, 85(2), B21–B30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 659–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2017). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 881–900. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dink, J. W., & Ferguson, B. (2015). eyetrackingR: An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. Retrieved from [URL]
Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J. (2017). Empirical logit analysis is not logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 28–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). Multipic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 808–816. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S. (2019). Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), 385–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerth, S., Otto, C., Felser, C., & Nam, Y. (2017). Strength of garden-path effects in native and non-native speakers’ processing of object–subject ambiguities. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 125–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W. (2020). How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Häussler, J., & Bader, M. (2011). Grammar- versus frequency-driven syntactic ambiguity resolution: The case of double-object constructions. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 273–301). Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3), 277–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17, 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H., & Lemmerth, N. (2018). Lexical and syntactic congruency in L2 predictive gender processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 171–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 251–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, A., Pickering, M. J., & Corley, M. (2018). Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitrofanova, N., Sekerina, I. A., Sauermann, A., Gagarina, N., & Westergaard, M. (2019, June 27). Cross-linguistic differences in predictive use of grammatical case in Russian and German (comparing monolingual and bilingual children) [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Bilingualism (ISB), University of Alberta, Canada.
Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2016). The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 19–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, R. E., Grüter, T., & Borovsky, A. (2015). Anticipatory and locally coherent lexical activation varies as a function of language proficiency. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1865–1870). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. (2016). Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual world study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 636–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Schlenter, J. (2019). Predictive language processing in late bilinguals: Evidence from visual-world eye-tracking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Potsdam. publish.UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M. (2017). Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 26–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Yin, Huanhuan & Martin J. Pickering
2026. Predicting words across languages depends on language context: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 146 ► pp. 104701 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2024. Morphosyntactic predictive processing in adult heritage speakers: effects of cue availability and spoken and written language experience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:1 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Pérez, A. I., E. Schmidt & I. M. Tsimpli
2024. Inferential evaluation and revision in L1 and L2 text comprehension: An eye movement study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:4 ► pp. 585 ff. DOI logo
Schlenter, Judith & Marit Westergaard
2024. What eye and hand movements tell us about expectations towards argument order: An eye- and mouse-tracking study in German. Acta Psychologica 246 ► pp. 104241 ff. DOI logo
Schlenter, Judith & Marit Westergaard
2025. The real-time processing of morphological case by German L1 speakers in Norway: A case of attrition?. Applied Psycholinguistics 46 DOI logo
Schlenter, Judith
2023. Prediction in bilingual sentence processing: How prediction differs in a later learned language from a first language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue