In:Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning
Edited by Edith Kaan and Theres Grüter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 12] 2021
► pp. 1–24
Chapter 1Prediction in second language processing and learning
Advances and directions
Published online: 22 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.12.01kaa
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.12.01kaa
Abstract
There is ample evidence that language users, including second language (L2) speakers, can predict upcoming information during listening and reading. Yet it is still unclear when, how, and why language users engage in prediction, and what the relation is between prediction and learning. This volume presents a collection of current research, insights and directions regarding the role of prediction in L2 processing and learning. In this introductory chapter, we provide an overview of the current state of the field and highlight that prediction may not always be the most efficient processing mechanism, depending on a language user’s linguistic experience, task demands, goals and resources. We propose that a focus on the utility of prediction may help us better understand differences in predictive processing within and between individuals and groups.
Article outline
- Introduction
- What is prediction and what is it good for in L2 learning and processing?
- What is prediction?
- What is prediction good for?
- A brief history of prediction in language processing research
- Research on prediction in L1 sentence processing
- Research on prediction in L2 sentence processing
- Prediction in L1 and L2 processing: The role of utility
- Cue reliability and utility in L1 predictive processing
- Cue reliability and utility in L2 predictive processing
- A note about proficiency
- Prediction and learning
- Insights from L1 speakers
- Insights from L2 speakers
- Again: Utility
- Concluding remarks, synopses of chapters, and future directions
Acknowledgments References
References (109)
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264.
Andringa, S. (2020). The emergence of awareness in uninstructed L2 learning: A visual world eye tracking study. Second Language Research, 36(3), 335–357.
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122(3), 292–305.
Aurnhammer, C., & Frank, S. L. (2019). Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading. Neuropsychologia, 134, 107198.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 190–214). New York Academy of Sciences.
Bjork, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 241–252.
Bosker, H. R., van Os, M., Does, R., & van Bergen, G. (2019). Counting ‘uhm’s: How tracking the distribution of native and non-native disfluencies influences online language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 189–202.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652.
Brothers, T., Dave, S., Hoversten, L. J., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2019). Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia, 135, 107225.
Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203–216.
Brouwer, S., Sprenger, S., & Unsworth, S. (2017). Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 50–65.
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.
Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21–58.
Curcic, M., Andringa, S., & Kuiken, F. (2019). The role of awareness and cognitive aptitudes in L2 predictive language processing. Language Learning, 69(S1), 42–71.
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634).
DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645.
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121.
Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2017). Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930.
(2019). Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 881–900.
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387.
Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 443–448.
Ferreira, F., Foucart, A., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2013). Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 165–182.
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘Good Enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83.
Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2013). Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 578–591.
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–18.
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 4161–1469.
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E., & Costa, A. (2016). Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 213–219.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W. (2020). How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221–234.
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215.
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Shafer, A. J. (2014). The role of discourse-level expectations in non-native speakers’ referential choices. In W. Orman & M. J. Valleau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 179–191). Cascadilla Press.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339–356.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226.
Henry, N., Hopp, H., & Jackson, C. N. (2017). Cue additivity and adaptivity in predictive processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(10), 1229–1249.
Henry, N., Jackson, C. N., & Hopp, H. (2020). Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German. Second Language Research, 0267658320963151.
Hertel, P. (2020). Everyday challenges to the practice of desirable difficulties: introduction to the forum. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 425–427.
Heyselaar, E., Peeters, D., & Hagoort, P. (2020). Do we predict upcoming speech content in naturalistic environments? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–22.
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.
(2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56.
(2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3), 277–306.
(2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 32(2), 277–307.
(2020). Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(3), 627–656.
Hopp, H., & Lemmerth, N. (2018). Lexical and syntactic congruency in l2 predictive gender processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 171–199.
Hsu, N. S., & Novick, J. M. (2016). Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing. Psychological Science, 27(4), 572–582.
Huettig, F., & Brouwer, S. (2015). Delayed anticipatory spoken language processing in adults with dyslexia – Evidence from eye-tracking. Dyslexia, 21(2), 97–122.
Huettig, F., & Guerra, E. (2019). Effects of speech rate, preview time of visual context, and participant instructions reveal strong limits on prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1706, 196–208.
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2015). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31.
Huettig, F., & Pickering, M. J. (2019). Literacy advantages beyond reading: Prediction of spoken language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 464–475.
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 251–264.
Ito, A., & Sakai, H. (2021). Everyday language exposure shapes prediction of specific words in listening comprehension: A visual world eye-tracking study [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(240).
Jackson, C. N., & Hopp, H. (2020). Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(5–6), 895–911.
Jackson, C. N., & Ruf, H. T. (2016). The priming of word order in second language German. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2), 315–345.
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83.
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591.
(2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282.
(2015). Knowing without predicting, predicting without learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(4), 482–486.
Kaan, E., & Chun, E. (2018a). Priming and adaptation in native speakers and second-language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 228–242.
(2018b). Syntactic adaptation. In K. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 68, pp. 85–116). Academic Press.
Kaan, E., Dallas, A. C., & Wijnen, F. (2010). Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In J.-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved. Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster (pp. 207–213). John Benjamins.
Kaan, E., Futch, C., Fernández Fuertes, R., Mujcinovic, S., & Álvarez de la Fuente, E. (2019). Adaptation to syntactic structures in native and non-native sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 3–27.
Kaan, E., Kirkham, J., & Wijnen, F. (2016). Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 1–18.
Kan, I. P., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Drummey, A. B., Nutile, L., Krupa, L., & Novick, J. M. (2013). To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control. Cognition, 129(3), 637–651.
Kim, H., & Grüter, T. (2020). Predictive processing of implicit causality in a second language: A visual-world eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–22.
Kleinschmidt, D. F., Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148–203.
Koehne, J., & Crocker, M. W. (2014). The interplay of cross-situational word learning and sentence-level constraints. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 849–889.
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition & Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59.
Lau, E., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 484–502.
Lee, A., Perdomo, M., Kaan, E. (2020). Native and second-language processing of contrastive pitch accent: An ERP study. Second Language Research, 36(4), 503–527.
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(731).
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447–464.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge University Press.
Martin, A. E. (2016). Language processing as cue integration: Grounding the psychology of language in perception and neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(120).
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.
Mishra, R. K., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Huettig, F. (2012). Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eyemovements are modulated by reading ability – Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(1), 1–10.
Mitsugi, S. (2020). Generating predictions based on semantic categories in a second language: A case of numeral classifiers in Japanese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(3), 323–349.
Montero-Melis, G., & Jaeger, T. F. (2020). Changing expectations mediate adaptation in L2 production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 602–617.
Morales, L., Paolieri, D., Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Gerfen, C., & Bajo, M. T. (2015). The gender congruency effect during bilingual spoken-word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 294–310.
Myslín, M., & Levy, R. (2016). Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition: Evidence from syntactic processing. Cognition, 147, 29–56.
Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., & Rösler, F. (2020). Are words pre-activated probabilistically during sentence comprehension? Evidence from new data and a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using publicly available data. Neuropsychologia, 142, 107427.
Nieuwland, M. S. (2019). Do ‘early’ brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 367–400.
Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. A., Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., Donaldson, D. I., Kohút, Z., Rueschemeyer, S. A., & Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. Elife, 7.
Perdomo, M., & Kaan, E. (2019). Prosodic cues in second-language speech processing: A visual world eye-tracking study. Second Language Research.
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(4), 409–453.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.
Porretta, V., Buchanan, L., & Järvikivi, J. (2020). When processing costs impact predictive processing: The case of foreign-accented speech and accent experience. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1558–1565.
Potts, R., Davies, G., & Shanks, D. R. (2019). The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1023–1041.
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2016). Foreign-accented speech modulates linguistic anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia, 85, 245–255.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536.
Ryskin, R., Ng, S., Mimnaugh, K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2020). Talker-specific predictions during language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(6), 797–812.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schremm, A., Hed, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2017). Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education, 114, 206–221.
Siegelman, N., & Arnon, I. (2015). The advantage of starting big: Learning from unsegmented input facilitates mastery of grammatical gender in an artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 85, 60–75.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.
Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68.
Van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M. (2017). Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 26–42.
Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2010). The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad – Any implications for neuropragmatics? Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 181–208.
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467.
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271.
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Yin, Huanhuan & Martin J. Pickering
Fernandez, Leigh B, Lauren V Hadley, Aybora Koç, John CB Gamboa & Shanley EM Allen
Hwang, Haerim & Sun Hee Park
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Björn Lundquist, Yulia Rodina, Eirik Tengesdal, Nina Hagen Kaldhol, Emel Türker & Valantis Fyndanis
Kim, Hyunwoo, Kitaek Kim & Joonhee Kim
Nguyen, Hoan & Theres Grüter
2025. Facilitative use of classifiers in heritage Vietnamese. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:6 ► pp. 812 ff.
Treadway, Hannah, Josh Higdon & Jorge Valdés Kroff
Ito, Aine
Kaan, Edith, Haoyun Dai & Xiaodong Xu
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
Momenian, Mohammad, Mahsa Vaghefi, Hamidreza Sadeghi, Saeedeh Momtazi & Lars Meyer
Sagarra, Nuria, Laura Fernández‐Arroyo, Cristina Lozano‐Argüelles & Joseph V. Casillas
Schlenter, Judith & Marit Westergaard
Vanek, Norbert, Ana Matić Škorić, Sara Košutar, Štěpán Matějka & Kate Stone
Ahn, Hyunah & Mi-Jeong Song
Alzahrani, Alaa
Fernandez, Leigh B., Agnesa Xheladini & Shanley E. M. Allen
2023. Proficient L2 readers do not have a risky reading strategy. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:6 ► pp. 854 ff.
Lago, Sol, Kate Stone, Elise Oltrogge & João Veríssimo
Schlenter, Judith
Wigdorowitz, Mandy, Ana I. Pérez & Ianthi M. Tsimpli
Bovolenta, Giulia & Emma Marsden
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
