Cover not available

In:Input Processing and Processing Instruction: The acquisition of Italian and Modern Standard Arabic
Alessandro G. Benati
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 11] 2021
► pp. 47–66

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Structured input vs. textual enhancement on the acquisition of Italian subjunctive of doubt

Sentence and discourse-level tasks (with Gaia Chiuchiu)

Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.11.c3
Article outline
  • 3.1Introduction
  • 3.2Background
    • The processing problem of non-meaningfulness, redundancy and location
    • Empirical research measuring structured input practice (enhanced and unenhanced)
    • Empirical research measuring discourse-level effects
    • The role of structured input
  • 3.3Motivation and research questions for the present study
  • 3.4Design
    • Participants
    • Target feature
    • Procedure
    • Instructional materials
      • Structured input
    • Textual enhancement
    • Control
    • Assessment tasks
  • 3.5Results
    • Results from the sentence-level interpretation task
    • Results from the sentence-level production task
    • Results from the discourse-level interpretation task
    • Summary of results
  • 3.6Discussion and conclusion
  • References
References (34)
References
Agiasophiti, Z. (2013). Exploring possible effects of gender and enhanced vs. unenhanced processing nstruction on the acquisition of case marking in L2 German. In J. Lee & A. Benati (Eds.), Individual differences and processing instruction (pp. 153–184). Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Classroom-oriented research: Processing Instruction (findings and implications). Language Teaching, 52(3), 343–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Processing instruction and discourse. Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & Hikima, N. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse-level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & McNulty, E. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 97–147). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, A. C. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania, 85, 308–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 119–141). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farley, A. P. (2001a). The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 57–94Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania 84, 289–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004a). The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 227–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Structured Input. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2004). On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (ed), Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 311–323) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007a). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and in virtual contexts: Research and practice. Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Making communicative teaching happen (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M. (Forthcoming). A research synthesis and meta-analysis of processing instruction.
Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56(3), 507–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & W. R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 2: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 41–56). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241–255). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 225–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Patten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–803. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (Ed.) (2004a). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 113–135). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, J. (2015). The effect of input-based instruction type on the acquisition of Spanish accusative clitics. Hispania, 98, 264–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187–205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue