In:Child Bilingualism and Second Language Learning: Multidisciplinary perspectives
Edited by Fangfang Li, Karen E. Pollock and Robbin Gibb
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 10] 2020
► pp. 137–166
Chapter 8Current developments in bilingual primary education in the
Netherlands
Published online: 1 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.10.08gra
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.10.08gra
Abstract
This contribution addresses two studies of the
processes and outcomes of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Dutch
primary education. Firstly, this article describes a preliminary
study of the learning outcomes at the end of primary education,
comparing pupils’ language proficiency after either two years or six to
eight years of low-intensity EFL programs. Secondly, it describes
the outcomes of a subsequent classroom observation study in a
high-intensity bilingual primary education pilot in grade 1,
focusing on teacher language use and teacher-pupil interaction.
Results are related to learning outcome in terms of pupils’
receptive vocabulary knowledge. Conclusions focus on foreign
language teaching in primary education in general, and bilingual
primary education in particular.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Content and language integrated learning
- Bilingual primary education in the Netherlands
- Factors influencing second language learning
- The role of linguistic input on vocabulary development
- The present studies
- Study 1
- Method
- Participants
- Instruments
- Procedure
- Results
- Written test results
- Oral proficiency test results
- Discussion Study 1
- Method
- Study 2
- Method
- Participants
- Teachers
- Pupils
- Materials and procedure
- The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
- Classroom observations
- Transcription procedure
- Data analysis
- Linguistic analyses
- Amount of talk
- Lexical diversity
- Lexical sophistication
- Syntactic complexity
- Participants
- Statistical analyses
- Results
- The relation between teachers’ input and children’s vocabulary
- Word-level model
- Utterance-level model
- Discussion Study 2
- Method
- General discussion and conclusion
- Limitations and future research
- Conclusion
Notes References
References (54)
Ascentis
Anglia. (2009). Handbook
for teachers; Full examination syllabus and
specifications. Lancaster: Ascentis.
Aukrust, V. G., & Rydland, V. (2011). Preschool
classroom conversations as long-term resources for second
language and literacy
acquisition. Journal of
Applied Developmental
Psychology, 32(4), 198–207.
Bowers, E. P., & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). The
relation between teacher input and lexical growth of
preschoolers. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 221–41.
Cenoz, J. (2013). Discussion:
Towards an educational perspective in CLIL language policy
and pedagogical
practice. International
Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 16(3), 389–94.
Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability
revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability
formula. Boston, MA: Brookline Books.
Costache, O. (2017). English
language use in bilingual primary schools: The relation
between teacher input and children’s vocabulary
knowledge (Unpublished
Master’s thesis). Utrecht University. Retrieved
from <[URL]> (11 June, 2020).
Council of
Europe. (2001). The
Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved
from <[URL]> (11 June, 2020).
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL:
Content and Language Integrated
Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language
use and language learning in CLIL
classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Graaff, R. (2015). Vroeg of laat Engels in het basisonderwijs;
Wat levert het op? [Early or late English in primary education;
What is the impact?]. Levende
Talen
Tijdschrift, 16(2), 3–15.
De Houwer, A. (2007). Parental
language input patterns and children’s bilingual
use. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 411–24.
Dickinson, D. K., & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation
between language experiences in preschool classrooms and
children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and
reading abilities. Child
Development, 82(3), 870–86.
Driessen, G., Krikhaar, E., De Graaff, R., Unsworth, S., Leest, B., Coppens, K., & Wierenga, J. (2016). Evaluation
pilot bilingual primary
education. Nijmegen: ITS, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody
Picture Vocabulary Test (4th
ed.). Bloomington, MI: NCS Pearson Assessments.
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual
differences in second language
learning. In The
handbook of applied
linguistics (pp. 525–51). Oxford: Blackwell.
EP-Nuffic. 2017. Streefwoordenlijst Engels voor groep 1 en 2
uit het tweetalig primair onderwijs
(TPO) [English
Target word list for Kindergarten in Bilingual primary
education]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Nuffic.
Gámez, P. B. (2015). Classroom-based
English exposure and English language learners’ expressive
language skills. Early
Childhood Research
Quarterly, 31, 135–146.
Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). The
relation between exposure to sophisticated and complex
language and early-adolescent English-only and language
minority learners’
vocabulary. Child
Development, 83(4), 1316–1331.
Gámez, P. B., Neugebauer, S. R., Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Ware, S. (2017). Linguistic
and social cues for vocabulary learning in dual language
learners and their English-only
peers. Early Childhood
Research
Quarterly, 40, 25–37.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. (2013). Bayesian
Data Analysis (3rd
ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K. (2013). Two
case studies of content-based language
education. Journal of
Immersion and Content-Based Language
Education, 1(1), 3–33.
Geurts, B., & Hemker, B. (2013). Balans van het Engels aan het eind van de
basisschool 4; uitkomsten van de vierde peiling in
2012 [English at the end of primary education 4; outcomes of the
fourth census in
2012]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
Geurts, B., de Graaff, R., & Hemker, B. (2014). Engels in het basisonderwijs: Opbrengsten Eibo
en vvto [English in primary education: Outcomes of early and late
English
programs]. In A. Corda, K. Philipsen & R. de Graaff (Eds.), Handboek
vroeg vreemdetalenonderwijs: Engels op de
basisschool (pp. 121–137). Bussum, the Netherlands: Coutinho.
Guiraud, P. (1960). Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique
linguistique [Problems and methods of statistical
linguistics]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language
input and child
syntax. Cognitive
Psychology, 45(3), 337–74.
Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2007). The
effects of CLIL instruction on children’s narrative
competence. Vienna English
Working
Papers, 15(3), 41–46.
Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., Zucker, T., Cabell, S. Q., & Piasta, S. B. (2013). Bi-directional
dynamics underlie the complexity of talk in teacher-child
play-based conversations in classrooms serving at-risk
pupils. Early Childhood
Research
Quarterly, 28(3), 496–508.
Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The
influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on
young European learners’ foreign language
comprehension. International
Journal of
Multilingualism, 10(1), 105–129.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The
roles of language in
CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The
CHILDES project: Tools for
analyzing (3rd
ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age
and the rate of foreign language
learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2014). Contrasting
effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of
foreign language
learners. Applied
Linguistics, 35(4), 463–482.
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2011). All
shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and
learning of foreign
languages. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 31, 95–119.
Núñez, B., & Dafouz, E. (2007). Lecturing
through the foreign language in a CLIL University context:
Linguistic and pragmatic
Implications. VIEWS, 16(3), 36–42.
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual
differences in child English second language acquisition:
Comparing child-internal and child-external
factors. Linguistic
Approaches to
Bilingualism, 1(3), 213–237.
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2011). Bilingual
children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based
approach. Journal of Child
Language, 38(3), 554–578.
Quiroz, B. G., Snow, C. E., & Zhao, J. (2010). Vocabulary
skills of Spanish – English bilinguals: impact of mother –
child language interactions and home language and literacy
support. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 14(4), 379–399.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical
linear models : Applications and data analysis
methods (2nd
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical
techniques for the study of language and language
behaviour. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A
longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and
quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary
development. Child
Development, 83(5), 1762–1774.
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The
home language environment of monolingual and bilingual
children and their language
proficiency. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 117–140.
Thijs, A., Tuin, D., & Trimbos, A. (2011). Engels in het basisonderwijs: Verkenning van
de stand van zaken [English in elementary education: An
exploration of the state of the
art]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
Unsworth, S. (2016). Early
child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or
both? Journal of Child
Language, 43(3), 608–634.
Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & De Bot, K. (2014). An
investigation of factors affecting early foreign language
learning in the
Netherlands. Applied
Linguistics, 36(5), 527–548.
Van Hout, R., & Vermeer, A. (1988). Spontane taaldata en het meten van lexicale
rijkdom in
tweedetaalverwerving [Spontaneous speech data and measuring methods
of lexical richness in second language
acquisition]. Toegepaste
Taalwetenschap in
Artikelen, 32, 108–22.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth
and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and
frequency of input. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217–234.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Goriot, Claire & Roeland van Hout
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
