Article published In: Commitment
Edited by Philippe De Brabanter and Patrick Dendale
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22] 2008
► pp. 15–36
Tense, modality and commitment in modes of mixed enunciation
Published online: 15 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.02cel
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.22.02cel
This paper presents a semantic treatment of the modal uses of the future tense and the conditional in French and a comparison with their English translations. It is argued that the future and the conditional convey the speaker’s commitment and non-commitment respectively, regardless of how information has been obtained and irrespective of whether this information has been verified or not. Commitment and non-commitment are defined as modes of enunciation depending on how the speaker treats and possibly eliminates representations other than her own representation. The modal meaning of the uses under discussion is shown to derive from a mode of mixed enunciation, which either modulates assertion in the case of commitment or suspends it in the case of noncommitment. In English, this difference is not grammaticalised in the verb system. For example, the modal must may be regarded as an equivalent for both the epistemic conditional and the modal future.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kraitzman, Alon P., Stephanie L. DeMora & Dolores Albarracín
Lansari, Laure
Cornillie, Bert
Besnard, Anne-Laure
2017. BE likely to and BE expected to, epistemic modality or evidentiality?. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 249 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
