Article published In: Hybrid Quotations
Edited by Philippe De Brabanter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17] 2003
► pp. 167–186
Too Counter-Intuitive to Believe? Pragmatic Accounts of Mixed Quotation
Published online: 5 April 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.17.10rei
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.17.10rei
Intuitively, an utterance of:
(1) Alice said that life is “difficult to understand”
would not be true unless Alice
uttered the very words “difficult to understand.” However, several recent theories of “mixed quotation” contend that the
intuition here is a misleading one. According to these theories, the truth conditions of (1) are identical to those
of:
(2) Alice said that life is difficult to understand.
On such accounts, the quotation marks in (1) are of only
pragmatic significance. That Alice uttered the quoted words is something the speaker might well convey in uttering (1); it is
not something literally expressed by the utterance itself. Whatever its theoretical motivations, these contentions are
undeniably counter-intuitive and the pragmaticist owes us an explanation of where they come from. This paper presents and
evaluates various strategies that a pragmaticist with respect to mixed quotation might appeal to in an effort to explain the
source of the counter-intuitive consequences of his theory.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Oishi, Etsuko
Kalmanovitch, Yshai
García-Carpintero, Manuel
García-Carpintero, Manuel
MCCULLAGH, MARK
De Brabanter, Philippe
De Brabanter, Philippe
Werning, Markus
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
