Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Poetry
Edited by Christine Michaux and Marc Dominicy
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 15] 2001
► pp. 75–86
Poetry and formulaic language
Published online: 27 March 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.15.06mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.15.06mac
Corpora show that people are less original in using language than is generally believed. We routinely employ an immense
repertoire of semi-preconstructed phrases, though we also adapt them: creative extensions and adaptations of institutionalized
locutions sometimes occur more frequently than the ordinary form. Corpora also reveal that fiction uses verbal idioms rarely
found in other forms of writing or in conversation, which suggests that novelists draw on their own experience of stereotyped
fictional dialogue more than on real-life conversation. Oral epic poetry, from Homer to Beowulf, was, of
course, also formulaic, but the received view is that written poetry should be quite the opposite: it should consist of new
combinations of words. While it is easy to find poetry that does contain fixed expressions and poetic
transformations of them, such as the ‘conversational’ (and occasionally prosaic) poetry of Wordsworth, Frost, Auden and
McDiarmid, it is harder to argue that the poetry of Shakespeare, Donne, Shelley, Keats, Hopkins, Stevens or Ashbery is made up
of formulaic language. Conversely, however, it can be shown that canonical poetry is the source of hundreds of phrases in our
active verbal lexicons.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
