Article published In: Linguistic Approaches to Poetry
Edited by Christine Michaux and Marc Dominicy
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 15] 2001
► pp. 1–10
Non-lexicalised concepts and degrees of effability
Poetic thoughts and the attraction of what is not in the dictionary
Published online: 27 March 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.15.02pil
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.15.02pil
Some concepts — and hence the thoughts that contain them — are relatively ineffable. Some literary communication nevertheless
attempts to eff these concepts. This article is interested in the nature of such concepts and the extent to which pragmatics can
deal with them. I discuss the idea, familiar from Relevance Theory and developed in Carston (1996; forthcoming), that pragmatic
inferencing is involved in on-line ad hoc concept construction, certainly in the case of concept narrowing, but
also possibly in the case of concept loosening. I then discuss the relative effability of non-lexicalised concepts, borrowing from
Sperber and Wilson (1998) and focussing on phenomenal concepts (or concepts with a significant phenomenal component). I then
define poetic thoughts as thoughts containing such concepts.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Ifantidou, Elly & Anna Piata
Kuzeev, Sergei
Dominicy, Marc
Kolaiti, Patricia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
