Article published In: The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research:
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 345–356
Delineating extravagance
Assessing speakers’ perceptions of imaginative constructional patterns
Published online: 28 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00058.ung
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00058.ung
Abstract
While the concept of extravagance, used to describe speakers’ use of imaginative and noticeable language, has seen a surge
in popularity in recent constructionist work, researchers have not yet converged on a set of common criteria for identifying extravagant
expressions. In this paper, we discuss a variety of existing definitions and combine them into five main characteristics of extravagant
language. We then present the results of a small-scale pilot rating study in which speakers judged extravagant sentences and their
non-extravagant paraphrases. Our findings suggest that different constructions vary in their degree of perceived extravagance, and that
certain features (e.g. stylistic salience) apply to most extravagant examples while the role of other factors (e.g. the speaker’s emotional
involvement) may be restricted to a subset of extravagant patterns. We conclude with some open questions concerning the further demarcation
and operationalisation of the concept of extravagance.
Keywords: extravagance, construction grammar, defining features, rating study
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Unifying previous definitions of extravagance
- 3.Language users’ perception of extravagant constructions: A rating study
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (23)
Bryer, Jason. 2019. likert: Analysis and Visualization of Likert Items. R-script available at <[URL]> (last checked 21/10/2020)
Dahl, Östen. 2001. “Inflationary Effects in Language and Elsewhere.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 471–480. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
d’Avis, Franz, and Rita Finkbeiner (eds). 2019. Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard. 2020. “Standing out with the Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics 56 (3): 479–514.
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2002. “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: a Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2). 151–195.
Drummond, Alex D. 2020. Ibex Farm. Available at <[URL]> (last checked 21/10/2020)
Eitelmann, Matthias, and Dagmar Haumann (eds.). In prep. Extravagant Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Günther, Christine, Sven Kotowski, and Ingo Plag. 2020. “Phrasal Compounds Can Have Adjectival Heads: Evidence from English.” English Language and Linguistics 24 (1): 75–95.
Hein, Katrin. 2017. “Modeling the Properties of German Phrasal Compounds within a Usage-Based Constructional Approach.” In Further Investigations into the Nature of Phrasal Compounding, ed. by Carola Trips, and Jaklin Kornfilt, 119–148. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2014. “The Nature of Speaker Creativity in Linguistic Innovation.” In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change, ed. by Evie Coussé, and Ferdinand von Mengden, 147–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kempf, Luise, and Stefan Hartmann. 2018. “Schema Unification and Morphological Productivity: A Diachronic Perspective.” In The Construction of Words. Advances in Construction Morphology, ed. by Geert E. Booij, 441–474. Berlin: Springer.
. forthcoming. “What’s Extravagant about be-sandaled Feet? Morphology, Semantics and Pragmatics of German
Pseudo-Participles.” In Extravagant morphology, ed. by Matthias Eitelmann, and Dagmar Haumann. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lensch, Anke. 2018. “
Fixer-Uppers. Reduplication in the Derivation of Phrasal Verbs.” In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, and Ulrike Freywald, 158–181. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter.
Petré, Peter. 2016. “Unidirectionality as a Cycle of Convention and Innovation: Micro-Changes in the Grammaticalization of [be
going to INF].” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 301: 115–146.
. 2017. “The Extravagant Progressive: An Experimental Corpus Study on the History of Emphatic [be
Ving].” English Language and Linguistics 21 (2): 227–250.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, and Franziska Günther. 2016. “Toward a Unified Socio-Cognitive Framework for Salience in Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 71.
Ungerer, Tobias, and Stefan Hartmann. 2020. “Attack of the Snowclones: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Extravagant Formulaic Patterns.” Paper presented at the UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, July 27–29.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Bentein, Klaas
Benítez‐Burraco, Antonio, Stefan Hartmann & Michael Pleyer
Bergs, Alexander
Bergs, Alexander & Meike Pentrel
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2025. What makes Construction Grammar relevant for contact linguistics — and vice versa?. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 1 ff.
Frankowsky, Maximilian & Barbara Schlücker
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
HARTMANN, STEFAN & TOBIAS UNGERER
Hartmann, Stefan & Tobias Ungerer
Höder, Steffen
2023. The Devil is in the schema. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 81 ff.
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
Hartmann, Stefan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.