Cover not available

Article published In: The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research:
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 213–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Pragmatic information in constructions

What do speakers generalize?

 | Tel Aviv University
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00047.kuz
Abstract
Despite recent advances in Construction Pragmatics, a systematic way for delimiting coded pragmatic information has yet to be offered. This squib provides a step in establishing such an account by assessing what kind of pragmatic information speakers generalize from various usage-events. Drawing on findings from Conversation Analysis, I propose a distinction between pragmatic functions as speakers’ actions, and interactional patterns as discourse-information sequences. A synchronic examination of the Hebrew multifunctional discourse marker ′at/a yode′a/′at (′know.prs.m/f.sg′) demonstrates the consistent use of the construction in an interactional pattern across numerous usage-events. A qualitative diachronic analysis of ′at/a yode′a/′at suggests that speakers may associate forms with interactional patterns rather than with functions. This preliminary evidence provides support for the generalization of interactional patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Functions vs. interactional patterns
  • 3.The generalization of interactional patterns
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (21)
References
Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2013. “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2017. “What’s Pragmatics Doing outside Constructions?” In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line, ed. by Ilse Depraetere, and Raphael Salkie, 115–151. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata. 2018. “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes. A Study in Recent Language Change.” Romanian Review of Linguistics 63 (4): 341–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1987. “A Private History of the Concept ‘Frame’.” In Concepts of Case, ed. by René Dirven, and Giinter Radden, 28–36. Tiibingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2015a. “Conversation, Construction Grammar, and Cognition.” Language and Cognition 7 (4): 563–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of you know and I mean.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2005. “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1752–1778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hary, Benjamin, and Shlomo Izre’el. 2003. “The Preparatory Model of the Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH).” In Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew: Towards the Compilation of the Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH), ed. by Benjamin Hary, 189–219. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. “Multimodal Constructs – Multimodal Constructions? The Role of Constructions in the Working Memory.” Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melnik, Nurit. 2006. “A Constructional Approach to Verb-initial Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (2): 153–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. “Lexico-grammatical Patterns, Pragmatic Associations and Discourse Frequency.” In Constructions, Collocations, Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 239–293. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. “Grammaticalization.” In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Vit Bubenik, 269–283. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Leclercq, Benoît & Cameron Morin
2025. The Meaning of Constructions, DOI logo
Foolen, Ad
2023. CONSTRUCTION PRAGMATICS IN A WIDER CONTEXT. AN ADDITION TO WEN (2022). Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Kuzai, Einat
2022. Situation-bound utterances and constructional networks: The evolution of the Hebrew see-farewell family. Lingua 272 ► pp. 103328 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue