Article published In: The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research:
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 186–198
Individual differences in discourse priming
A traceback approach
Published online: 28 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00045.koc
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00045.koc
Abstract
In this paper we use corpora of four monolingual German-speaking children at 2 years of age to analyze the effect
of input on the activation of chunks and frame-and-slot patterns. For this purpose, we first investigate to what extent chunks and
patterns can be traced back to the direct input compared to input which is not part of the immediate discourse situation. Second,
we take mean length of utterance (MLU) into account to see how the level of proficiency influences the amount of priming in each
child. Results indicate that children with a lower MLU rely more on priming than children who are more proficient. This conclusion
is consistent with the usage-based assumption that children’s linguistic development starts with a strongly item-based
reproduction of input patterns that gradually gives rise to increasingly creative and productive uses of constructions.
Article outline
- 1.Acquiring inventories: A usage-based perspective
- 2.Tracing back utterances
- 3.Case study
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Method
- 3.3Results
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
References
References (18)
Arnon, Inbal, and Morten H. Christiansen. 2017. “More Than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use.” Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3): 542–551.
Bannard, Colin, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello. 2009. “Modelling Children’s Early Grammatical Knowledge.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(41): 17284–17289.
Behrens, Heike. 2006. “The Input-Output Relationship in First Language Acquisition.” Language and Cognitive Processes 211: 2–24.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello. 2003. “A Construction Based Analysis of Child Directed Speech.” Cognitive Science 27(6): 843–873.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. “Different Speakers, Different Grammars: Individual Differences in Native Language Attainment.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2 (3): 219–253. <[URL]>.
Dąbrowska, Ewa, and Elena Lieven. 2005. “Towards a Lexically Specific Grammar of Children’s Question Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 16(3): 437–474.
Frank, Michael, Mika Braginsky, Daniel Yurovsky, and Virginia Marchman. 2017. “Wordbank: An Open Repository for Developmental Vocabulary Data.” Journal of Child Language 44 (3): 677–694. < >
Kirjavainen, Minna, and Anna Theakston. 2011. “Are Infinitival to Omission Errors Primed by Prior Discourse? The Case of WANT
Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 22(4): 629–657.
Koch, Nikolas. 2019. Schemata im Erstspracherwerb: eine Traceback-Studie für das Deutsche. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Lieven, Elena, Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares, and Michael Tomasello. 2003. “Early Syntactic Creativity: A Usage-Based Approach.” Journal of Child Language 301: 333–370.
Lieven, Elena, Dorothé Salomo, and Michael Tomasello. 2009. “Two-Year-Old Children’s Production of Multiword Utterances: A Usage-Based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 201: 481–507.
Pickering, Martin J., and Victor S. Ferreira. 2008. “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 134(3): 427–459.
Rowland, Caroline F., Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine, and Elena V. M. Lieven. 2012. “The Development of Abstract Syntax: Evidence from Structural Priming and the Lexical Boost.” Cognition 125(1): 49–63.
Savage, Ceri, Elena Lieven, Anna Theakston, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. “Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming
in 4-Year-Olds.” Language Learning and Development 2(1): 27–49.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Theakston, Anna, and Elena Lieven. 2008. “The Influence of Discourse Context on Children’s Provision of Auxiliary BE.” Journal of Child Language 351: 129–158.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Koch, Nikolas & Katharina Günther
2025. Patterns in (bilingual) language acquisition. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 208 ff.
Gaskins, Dorota, Marianna Falcone & Gabriella Rundblad
Gaskins, Dorota, Antje Endesfelder Quick, Anna Verschik & Ad Backus
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
