Article published In: The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research:
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 79–86
Argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts
The case of the Japanese causal node construction
Published online: 28 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00036.fuj
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00036.fuj
Abstract
This paper presents a frame-based constructional approach to argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts, by
focusing on one such case in Japanese. It points out an intriguing constructional phenomenon whereby causal adjunct clauses marked with
node ‘because’, as used with main-clause predicates that evoke communication frames (such as Telling and
Warning), serve to satisfy main-clause argument structure. The node clause precedes the main-clause speech act of
telling/warning, and can be interpreted as a speech-act causal (Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ). The
node clause at the same time conveys the content of informing or warning, i.e., the core Frame Element message,
which is absent as a main-clause complement. This analysis of argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts provides evidence for
a Frame Semantic approach to argument structure that incorporates Construction Grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The target phenomenon: Observations
- 2.1[[ clause … ] node ‘because’, osirase simasu ‘inform (you)’] ‘inform (you) because …’
- 2.2[[clause…] node ‘because’, speech act] ‘speech act because …’
- 3.A frame-based constructional account for the phenomenon
- 4.Other cases of argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts
- 5.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (13)
Bergen, Benjamin. K., and Nancy Chang. 2005. “Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding.” In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Miriam Fried, 147–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case.” In Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach, and Robert T. Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.
Fillmore, Charles J., and Collin F. Baker. 2009. “A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 313–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fujii, Seiko, and Lee-Goldman, Russell. 2010. “Constructions for elaboration and specification in English and Japanese.” A paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Construction Grammar. Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Fujii, Seiko, and Russell Lee-Goldman. 2019. “Frame-based constructional approach to argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts.” Paper presented at the 15th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Nishinomiya.
Fujii, Seiko, and Kyoko Ohara. 2003. “Hureemu imiron to hureemunetto [Frame Semantics and FrameNet].” Eigo-seinen, Vol. 149 (6): 45–48, 59. Kenkyusha Co.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. “Argument Realization: The Role of Constructions, Lexical Semantics and Discourse Factors.” In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Miriam Fried, 17–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele E., and Farrell Ackerman. 2001. “The Pragmatics of Obligatory Adjuncts.” Language 771: 798–814.
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-Modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame Semantic Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.