Cover not available

Article published In: The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research:
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 17–29

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Constructional creativity in a Romance language

Valency coercion in Italian

 | Aston University
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00031.bus
Abstract
The present contribution summarizes findings on the understudied area of Italian valency coercion – i. e. the interaction of verbs and argument structure constructions in novel and creative ways – from four different studies. It highlights their innovative character, theoretical significance, and crosslinguistic implications for Construction Grammar. The paper suggests that valency coercion resolution involve different phenomena, such as distributional properties of constructions and compatibility between verb and construction. Sociolinguistic factors such as age and diatopic variables are also suggested to be relevant.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Valency coercion in English and Italian
  • 2.Experimental findings on valency coercion in Italian
    • 2.1Does valency coercion exist in Italian?
    • 2.2How much does construction semantics matter?
    • 2.3How much does verb compatibility matter?
    • 2.4Coercion and sociolinguistics
  • 3.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Barak, Libby, and Adele Goldberg. 2017. “Modeling the Partial Productivity of Constructions.” In Proceedings of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding: Technical Report SS-17-02,131–138. Stanford: AAAI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2011. “Coercion and Leaking Argument Structures in Construction Grammar.” Linguistics 49 (6): 1271–1303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C., and Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.). 2014. Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. “Diagnostics of Age-graded Linguistic Behaviour: The Case of the Quotative System.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 3–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busso, Lucia, Alessandro Lenci, and Florent Perek. 2020. “Valency Coercion in Italian.” Constructions and Frames 12 (2): 171–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busso, Lucia, Ludovica Pannitto, and Alessandro Lenci. 2018. “Modelling Italian Construction Flexibility with Distributional Semantics: Are Constructions Enough?” In Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2018), ed. by Elena Cabrio, Alessandro Mazzei, and Fabio Tamburini, 68–74. CEUR-WS Team. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busso, Lucia, Florent Perek, and Alessandro Lenci. In press. “Constructional Associations Trump Lexical Associations in Processing Valency Coercion.” Cognitive Linguistics.
Busso, Lucia, and Domenica Romagno. Forthcoming. “Caused Motion Constructions between standard and substandard: entrare, uscire, scendere, salire in contemporary Italian.” Italian Journal of Linguistics.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo. 2011. “Regional Varieties of Italian in the Linguistic Repertoire.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2101: 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriette. 1998. “Aspect Shift and Coercion.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161: 347–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2017. “Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 151–167. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick. 2019. “Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition.” The Modern Language Journal 103 (1): 39–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch.” In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried, and Jan-Ola Östman, 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Explain Me This. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2015. “From Hand-carved to Computerbased: Noun-participle Compounding and the Upward Strengthening Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 26 (1): 113–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Matt A., and Adele Goldberg. 2013. “Evidence for Automatic Accessing of Constructional Meaning: Jabberwocky Sentences Prime Associated Verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28 (10): 1439–1452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter. 2001. Lexical Typology from a Cognitive and Linguistic Point of View. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauwers, Peter and Dominique Willems. 2011. “Coercion: Definition and Challenges, Current Approaches, and New Trends.” Linguistics 49 (6): 1219–1235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebani, Gianluca, and Alessandro Lenci. 2017. “Modelling the Meaning of Argument Constructions with Distributional Semantics.” In Proceedings of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding: Technical Report SS-17-02, 197–204. Stanford: AAAI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro. 2018. “Distributional Models of Word Meaning.” Annual Review of Linguistics 41: 151–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2013. Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani [Linguistic Profile of Italian Dialects]. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca. 2005. “Multi-Word Expressions Between Syntax and the Lexicon: The Case of Italian Verb-particle Constructions.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 181: 145–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2004. “Type Shifting in Construction Grammar: An Integrated Approach to Aspectual Coercion.” Cognitive Linguistics 15 (1): 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, Florent. 2016. “Using Distributional Semantics to Study Syntactic Productivity in Diachrony: a Case Study.” Linguistics 54 (1): 149–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, Florent, and Adele Goldberg. 2017. “Linguistic Generalization on the Basis of Function and Constraints on the Basis of Statistical Preemption.” Cognition 1681: 276–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 2011. “Coercion in a General Theory of Argument Selection.” Linguistics 49 (6): 1401–1431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: una ricerca interlinguistica [Deictic Movement Verbs in Europe: a Crosslinguistic Research]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singmann, Henrik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall, and Frederik Aust. 2020. Afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suttle, Laura, and Adele Goldberg. 2011. “The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction.” Linguistics 49 (6): 1237–1269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne. 2012. “Age Grading in Sociolinguistic Theory.” Language and Linguistics Compass 6 (6): 371–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wonnacott, Elizabeth. 2013. “Statistical Mechanisms in Language Acquisition.” In The Language Phenomenon, ed. by Paul Binder, and Katherine Smith, 65–92. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, Soyeon. 2016. “Gradable Nature of Semantic Compatibility and Coercion: A Usage-Based Approach.” Linguistic Research 33 (1): 95–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Coercion and Language Change: a Usage-Based Approach.” Linguistic Research 36 (1): 111–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeschel, Arne. 2012. Incipient Productivity: a Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue