Cover not available

Introduction published In: Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation:
Edited by Ludovic De Cuypere, Clara Vanderschueren and Gert de Sutter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31] 2017
► pp. 17

References (15)
References
Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. “Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives”. Linguistic Inquiry 411: 287–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W., and Marilyn Ford. 2010. “Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. “Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’”. ConstructionsGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: a study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller. 2017. “Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: the genitive alternation across varieties of English”. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray, and Perter William Culicover. 1971. “A Reconsideration of Dative Movement.” Foundations of Language 71: 397–412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago (Ill.): University of Chicago press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. 1988. “On the Double Object Construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 191: 335–393.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give: a cognitive linguistic study. Cognitive linguistics research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, Jason. 2009. “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism 131: 155–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günther. 2003. “Aspects of grammatical iconicity in English.” In From Sign to Signing, edited by Wolfgang G. Müller and Olga Fischer, 263–285. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shank, Christopher, Van Bogaert Julie, and Koen Plevoets. 2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 12(1): 31–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderschueren, Clara, and Kevin Diependaele. 2013. “The Portuguese Inflected Infinitive: An Empirical Approach.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 161–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie. 2016. “A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: that – variation in German and Spanish learner language”. In The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (Proceedings of GURT 2014), edited by Lourdes Ortega, Andrea E. Tyler, Hae In Park and Mariko Uno, 115–136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue