Cover not available

In:Advances in Research on Semantic Roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Benjamins Current Topics 88] 2016
► pp. 27–49

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies

 | Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
 | Philipps-Universität Marburg
Published online: 29 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.88.02har
In this chapter, we illustrate a method for identifying clusters of semantic roles by cross-linguistic comparison. On the basis of data from 25 languages drawn from the ValPaL (Valency Patterns Leipzig) database, we show how one can visualize coexpression tendencies using quantitative methods (in particular, multidimensional scaling). Traditionally, the coexpression of semantic microroles (such as the breaker and the broken thing of the ‘break’ verb, the helper and the helpee of the ‘help’ verb, etc.) has been studied for particular languages, with generalized macroroles such as “agent”, “actor”, and “undergoer” being compared across languages in a next step. We set up a conceptual space of 87 microroles based on their coexpression tendencies, i.e. the extent to which they are expressed identically (via flagging and indexing) across our languages. The individual coding means (cases, adpositions, index-sets) can then be mapped onto this conceptual space, revealing broader alignment patterns.
References (25)
References
Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11. 239–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Eric. 2013. Zenzontepec Chatino valency patterns. In Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL])Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Semantic maps as metrics on meaning. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 70–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Inducing semantic roles. In: Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55. 59–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann (eds.). 2008. The typology of semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change, 163–216. (Studies in Language Companion Series 106). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furrer, Reinhard, Douglas Nychka & Stephen Sain. 2012. Fields: Tools for spatial data. R package.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1974. Concessives, conditionals, and verbs of volition. Foundations of Language 11(3). 341–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.). 2013. Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL])Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann. 2014. Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Bernard Comrie & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.), Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997. Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1(3). 279–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2006. Participant roles, thematic roles and syntactic relations. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: In honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 153–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2013. Alignment preferences in basic and derived ditransitives. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 263–289. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2008. Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 121–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Motion events in parallel texts: A study in primary-data typology. Bern: University of Bern Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Creissels, Denis
2024. Transitivity, Valency, and Voice, DOI logo
Fasciolo, Marco
2022. Le paradoxe des verbes supports. Neophilologica 34 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Messerschmidt, Maria
2022. Increasing the valency of motion verbs: the case of the portative construction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue