In:Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Benjamins Current Topics 87] 2016
► pp. 73–92
Discourse-structuring functions of initial adverbials in English and Norwegian news and fiction
Published online: 20 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.87.05has
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.87.05has
This chapter explores the discourse-structuring functions of initial adverbial adjuncts in English and Norwegian news and fiction. Such discourse functions have to do with discourse linking and information management. The corpus study reveals frequency differences in the use of initial adjuncts across the languages, which are to some extent connected with an overall greater frequency of adjuncts in Norwegian. While initial adjuncts in fiction often signal cohesive relations, those in news are more typically due to backgrounding of less important information or to framing/scene-setting for the clause message. Norwegian initial adjuncts are even less likely than English ones to convey new information; on the other hand, initial position is to a lesser extent associated with contrastive focus in Norwegian. This, together with the higher frequency of initial adjuncts in Norwegian, suggests that initial placement of adjuncts carries a lower degree of markedness in Norwegian than in English.
Keywords: adverbials, cohesion, discourse organization, English/Norwegian, theme
References (22)
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Chafe, W. 1987. “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow”. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, R. Tomlin (ed), 21–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Charolles, M., Le Draoulec, A., Péry-Woodley, M.-A. and Sarda, L. 2005. “Temporal and Spatial Dimensions of Discourse Organisation”. Journal of French Language Studies 15(2):115–130.
Crompton, P. 2006. “The Effect of Position on the Discourse Scope of Adverbials”. Text and Talk 26(3):245–279.
Enkvist, N.E. 1978. “Linearity and Text Strategy”. In The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, J. Weinstock (ed), 159–172. Austin: The University of Texas.
. 1989. “Connexity, Interpretability, Universes of Discourse, and Text Worlds”. In Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, S. Allén (ed), 162–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Faarlund, J.T., Lie, S. and Vannebo, K.I. 1997. Norsk Referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Fries, P.H. 1995. “A Personal View of Theme”. In Thematic Development in English Texts, M. Ghadessy (ed), 1–19. London and New York: Pinter.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd edition). London: Arnold.
Hasselgård, H. 2004a. “Thematic Choice in English and Norwegian”. Functions of Language 11(2):187–212.
. 2004b. “Spatial Linking in English and Norwegian”. In Translation and Corpora, K. Aijmer and H. Hasselgård (eds), 163–188. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
. 2005. “Theme in Norwegian”. In Semiotics from the North: Nordic Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, K.L. Berge and E. Maagerø (eds), 35–48. Oslo: Novus.
Johansson, S. 2007. Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: on the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krzeszowski, T.P. 1990. Contrasting Languages. The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Shaw, P. 2004. “Sentence Openings in Academic Economics Articles in English and Danish”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 2(3):67–84.
Steiner, E. and Ramm, W. 1995. “On Theme as a Grammatical Notion for German”. Functions of Language 2(1):57–93.
