Cover not available

In:Gaze in Human-Robot Communication
Edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Benjamins Current Topics 81] 2015
► pp. 1332

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (60)
References
Ambrosini, E., Costantini, M., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011a). Grasping with the eyes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 1437–1442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G. (2009). Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. Journal of physiology, Paris, 103, 286–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaminade, T., Franklin, D., Oztop, E., & Cheng, G. (2005). Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artifical motion. In International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 96–101).
Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S–J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C.D., Micera, S., Dario, P., Rizzolatti, G., Gallese, V., & Umiltà, M.A. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One, 5, e11577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cross, E.S., Liepelt, R., de Chaf, Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W. (2011). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2238–2254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehais, F., Sisbot, E.A., Alami, R., & Causse, M. (2011). Physiological and subjective evaluation of a human-robot object hand-over task. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 785–791. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsner, C., D’Ausilio, A., Gredebäck, G., Falck-Ytter, T., & Fadiga, L. (2012). The motor cortex is causally related to predictive eye movements during action observation. Neuropsychologia, 51, 488–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eshuis, R., Coventry, K.R., & Vulchanova, M. (2009). Predictive eye movements are driven by goals, not by the mirror neuron system. Psychological Science, 20, 438–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabbri-Destro, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda), 23, 171–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebaeck, G., & von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 878–879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flanagan, J.R., & Johansson, R.S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424, 769–771. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(Pt 2), 593–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage, 35, 1674–1684. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gesierich, B., Bruzzo, A., Ottoboni, G., & Finos, L. (2008). Human gaze behaviour during action execution and observation. Acta psychological, 128, 324–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gredebäck, G., & Kochukhova, O. (2010). Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 493–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A. (2010). Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114, 197–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gredebäck, G., Stasiewicz, D., Falck-Ytter, T., von Hofsten, C., & Rosander, K. (2009). Action type and goal type modulate goal-directed gaze shifts in 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1190–1194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helskinki (1964, 2008) World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. URL: [URL]. Last accessed 24/4/2014.
Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy, 3, 519–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, R.S., Westling, G., Bäckström, A., & Flanagan, J.R. (2001). Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 6917–6932.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., & Arai, T. (2012). A psychological scale for general impressions of humanoids. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA, pp. 4030–4037).
Kanakogi, Y., & Itakura, S. (2011). Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nature Communications, 2, 341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S.J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., & Brandt, T. (2011). Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI & Society, 26, 339–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Brass, M. (2010). When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115, 426–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Fadiga, L., von Hofsten, C., Rosander, K., Lopes, M., Santos-Victor, J., Bernardino, A., & Montesano, L. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23, 1125–1134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moriguchi, Y., Minato, T., Ishiguro, H., Shinohara, I., & Itakura, S. (2010). Cues that trigger social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 181–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nyström, P., Ljunghammar, T., Rosander, K., & von Hofsten, C. (2011). Using mu rhythm desynchronization to measure mirror neuron activity in infants. Developmental Science, 14, 327–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oberman, L.M., McCleery, J.P., Ramachandran, V.S., & Pineda, J.A. (2007a). EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing, 70, 2194–2203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oberman, L.M., Pineda, J.A., & Ramachandran, V.S. (2007b). The human mirror neuron system: A link between action observation and social skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 62–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G. (2005). Human-humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2, 537–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pattacini, U., Nori, F., Natale, L., Metta, G., & Sandini, G. (2010). An experimental evaluation of a novel minimum-jerk cartesian controller for humanoid robots. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 1668–1674).
Perani, D., Fazio, F., Borghese, N.A., Tettamanti, M., Ferrari, S., Decety, J., & Gilardi, M.C. (2001). Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage, 14, 749–758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierno, A.C., Becchio C., Wall, M.B., Smith, A.T, Turella, L., & Castiello, U. (2006). When gaze turns into grasp. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 2130–2137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 632–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Press, C., Gillmeister, H., & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 274, 2509–2514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rani, P., Sims, J., Brackin, R., & Sarkar, N. (2002). Online stress detection using psychophysiological signal for implicit human-robot cooperation. Robotica, 20(6), 673–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1999). Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 137, 85–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 264–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosander, K., & von Hofsten, C. (2011). Predictive gaze shifts elicited during observed and performed actions in 10-month-old infants and adults. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2911–2917. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandini, G., Metta, G., & Vernon, D. (2007). The iCub cognitive humanoid robot: An open-system research platform for enactive cognition. In 50 years of artificial intelligence (pp. 358–369). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sciutti, A., Bisio, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Pozzo, T., & Sandini, G. (2012). Measuring human-robot interaction through motor resonance. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 223–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sciutti, A., Del Prete, A., Natale, L., Burr, D.C., Sandini, G., & Gori, M. (2013). Perception during interaction is not based on statistical context. IEEE/ACM Proceedings of the Human Robot Interaction Conference 2013 . p. 225–226.
Senju, A, Southgate, V, White, S, & Frith, U. (2009). Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325, 883–885. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimada, S. (2010). Deactivation in the sensorimotor area during observation of a human agent performing robotic actions. Brain Cognitive, 72, 394–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Southgate, V., Johnson, M.H., Osborne, T., & Csibra, G. (2009). Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants. Biology Letters, 5, 769–772. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadler, W., Ott, D.V., Springer, A., Schubotz, R.I., Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2012). Repetitive TMS suggests a role of the human dorsal premotor cortex in action prediction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadler, W., Schubotz, R.I., von Cramon, D.Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W. (2011). Predicting and memorizing observed action: Differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 677–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tai, Y.F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D.J., Sawamoto, N., & Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is ‘mirror’ only for biological actions. Current Biology, 14, 117–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S.M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2511–2521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Baaren, R.B., Holland, R.W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 393–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S. (2005). Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG. In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS, pp.1552–1557).
Woodward, A.L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bisio, Ambra, Alessandra Sciutti, Francesco Nori, Giorgio Metta, Luciano Fadiga, Giulio Sandini, Thierry Pozzo & Alessio Avenanti
2014. Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction. PLoS ONE 9:8  pp. e106172 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue