In:Gaze in Human-Robot Communication
Edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Benjamins Current Topics 81] 2015
► pp. 1–12
Design of a gaze behavior at a small mistake moment for a robot
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.81.01shi
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.81.01shi
A change of gaze behavior at a small mistake moment is a natural response that reveals our own mistakes and suggests an apology to others with whom we are working or interacting. In this paper we investigate how robot gaze behaviors at small mistake moments change the impressions of others. To prepare gaze behaviors for a robot, first, we identified by questionnaires how human gaze behaviors change in such situations and extracted three kinds: looking at the other, looking down, and looking away. We prepared each gaze behavior, added a no-gaze behavior, and investigated how a robot’s gaze behavior at a small mistake moment changes the impressions of the interacting people in a simple cooperative task. Experiment results show that the ‘looking at the other’ gaze behavior outperforms the other gaze behaviors and indicates the degrees of perceived apologeticness and friendliness.
Keywords: Communication robots, gaze, mistake, mitigation
References (17)
Birdwhistell, R.L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Groom, V., Chen, J., Johnson, T., Kara, F.A., & Nass, C. (2010). Critic, compatriot, or chump?: Responses to robot blame attribution. In
Proceeding of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(pp. 211–218).
Hayashi K., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., & Hagita N. (2011). Are robots appropriate for troublesome and communicative tasks in a city environment? IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 4, 150–160.
Ho, B. (2009). Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. Management Science, 58(1), 141–158.
Kirchner, N., Alempijevic, A., & Dissanayake, G. (2011). Nonverbal robot-group interaction using an imitated gaze cue. In
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(pp. 497–504).
Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). Receptionist or information kiosk: How do people talk with a robot?
Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
(pp. 31–40).
Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., & Rybski, P. (2010). Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services.
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(pp. 203–210).
Mutlu, B., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). Robots in organizations: Workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction.
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(pp. 287–294).
Mutlu, B., Kanda, T., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J., & Ishiguro, H. (2012). Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 1(2), 12.
Kahn, P.H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., & Kanda, T. (2007). What is a human? – Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 363–390.
Peltason, L., & Wrede, B. (2011). The curious robot as a case-study for comparing dialog systems. AI Magazine, 32(4), 85–99.
Sara, L., Jirina, K., Mattias, J., Henriette, C., & Karol, N. (2012). Hospital robot at work: Something alien or an intelligent colleague?
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
(pp. 13–15).
Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). How quickly should a communication robot respond? Delaying strategies and habituation effects. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(2), 141–155.
Srinivasan, V., & Murphy, R.R., (2011). A survey of social gaze. In
Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction
(pp. 253–254).
Vargas, M.F. (1986). Louder than words: An introduction to nonverbal communication. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Yamazaki, A., Yamazaki, K., Kuno, Y., Burdelski, M., Kawashima, M., & Kuzuoka, H. (2008). Precision timing in human-robot interaction: Coordination of head movement and utterance. In
Proceedings of CHI ‘08
(pp. 131–140).