Cover not available

In:Phonological and Phonetic Considerations of Lexical Processing
Edited by Gonia Jarema and Gary Libben †
[Benjamins Current Topics 80] 2015
► pp. 119–168

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners

 | Indiana University
 | Indiana University
 | Indiana University
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.80.06dar
For L2-learners, confusable phonemic categories lead to ambiguous lexical representations. Yet, learners can establish separate lexical representations for confusable categories, as shown by asymmetric patterns of lexical access, but the source of this asymmetry is not clear (Cutler et al., 2006). Two hypotheses compete, situating its source either at the lexical coding level or at the phonetic categorization level. The lexical coding hypothesis suggests that learners’ encoding of an unfamiliar category is not target-like but makes reference to a familiar L1 category (encoded as a poor exemplar of that L1 category). Four experiments examined how learners lexically encode confusable phonemic categories. American English learners of Japanese and of German were tested on phonetic categorization and lexical decision for geminate/singleton contrasts and front/back rounded vowel contrasts. Results showed the same asymmetrical patterns as Cutler et al.’s (2006), indicating that learners encode a lexical distinction between difficult categories. Results also clarify that the source of the asymmetry is located at the lexical coding level and does not emerge during input categorization: the distinction is not target-like, and makes reference to L1 categories. We further provide new evidence that asymmetries can be resolved over time: advanced learners are establishing more native-like lexical representations.
References (40)
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banno, E., Ohno, Y., Sakane, Y., & Shinagawa, C. (1999). Genki: An integrated course in elementary Japanese [volume 1,2]. Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C.T., & Tyler, M.D. (2007). Nonnative and second language speech perception. Commonalities and complementarities. InO.-S. Bohn & M.J. Munro(Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36, 22–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broersma, M. (2002). Comprehension of non-native speech: Inaccurate phoneme processing and activation of lexical competitors. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 261–264).
. (2012). Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1205–1224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 74–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A., Glover, J., Kaden, C., McGuire, M., & Scott, J.H.G. (2012). Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English-L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research, 28, 5–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. & Van Heuven, W.J.B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. InJ. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs(Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp.189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, U.H., Scholten, M., & Content, A. (2001). Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition. Language and cognitive processes, 16, 583–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaskell, M.G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2001). Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 325–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, M. (1992). The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for non-native speakers. Phonetica, 49, 102–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardison, D.M., & Motohashi Saigo, M. (2010). Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 81–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., & Masuda, K. (2008). Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research, 24, 5–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual omograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 225–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P.A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Representational specificity of within-category phonetic variation in the long-term mental lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 120–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.J. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Aslin, R.N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33–B42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Haywood, S.L. (2009). The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111, 263–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science,12, 445–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2005). Cross-Language Speech Perception. InD.B. Pisoni & R.E. Remez(Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp.546–566). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Díaz, B. (2006). First and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1277–1291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivey, M.J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. InJ.G. Hansen Edwards & M.L. Zampini(Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K. (2007). Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1111–1129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A.G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K.G. (2008). Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123, 397–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & John, P. (2011). When three equals tree. InP. Trofimovich & K. McDonough(Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from Psycholinguistics (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cook, Svetlana V., Nick B. Pandža, Alia K. Lancaster & Kira Gor
2016. Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue