In:Phonological and Phonetic Considerations of Lexical Processing
Edited by Gonia Jarema and Gary Libben †
[Benjamins Current Topics 80] 2015
► pp. 41–66
Production and accent affect memory
Laurie Beth Feldman | University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA | Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut
Published online: 1 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.80.02cho
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.80.02cho
In three experiments, we examined the effects of accents and production on free recall and yes/no recognition memory. In the study phase, native English participants heard English words pronounced by a speaker with an accent that is highly familiar to the participant (American English) or with a less familiar accent (Dutch). Participants had to either say aloud (produce) the word that they heard in their natural pronunciation (Exp. 1a) or imitate the original speaker (Exp. 1b) or simply listen to the word. In all experiments, in both recall and recognition, produced words and words spoken in an unfamiliar accent were more likely to be recalled and more likely to be recognized, than words that were listened to or words spoken in a more familiar accent. In recognition but not in recall, listening to words spoken in an unfamiliar accent improved memory more than listening to words spoken in a familiar accent. Results suggest that listening allows the acoustic-phonetic details of a speaker to be retained in memory, but that production attenuates details about the original speaker’s pronunciation. Finally, the benefit of production for memory does not differ whether one produces in one’s natural accent or imitates that of the speaker.
References (39)
Adank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 21, 1903–1909.
Adank, P., Evans, B.G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S.K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 520–529.
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M.S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 387–414.
Best, C.T., Bradlow, A.R., Guion-Anderson, S., & Polka, L. (2011). Using the lens of phonetic experience to resolve phonological forms. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 453–455.
Best, C.T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305–330.
Bradlow, A.R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729.
Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1491–1494.
Cho, K.W., & Feldman, L.B. (under revision). Memory of Repeating Accented Words: Phonological and phonetic influences on the production effect. Under Review.
Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
Derwing, T.M. & Munro, M.J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1, 1–16.
Dunlap, W.P., Cortina, J.M., Vaslow, J.B., & Burke, M.J. (1996). Metaanalysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177.
Eisenstein, M. (1983). Native reactions to non-native speech: A review of empirical research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 160–176.
Flege, J.E. (1987). The production of new and similar phonemes in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.
Flege, J., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in english: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 379–412.
Goldinger, S.D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166–1183.
. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
Goldinger, S.D., Pisoni, D.B., & Logan, J.S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 152–162.
Hanulikova, A., Van Alphen, P.M., Van Goch, M.M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 878–887.
Kuhl, P.K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science
, 97, 11850–11857.
. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.
Lecumberri, M.L.G., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A. (2010). Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, 52, 864–886.
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093–1096.
Luce, P.A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.
MacLeod, C.M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K.L., Neary, K.R., & Ozubko, J.D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685.
Maye, J., Aslin, R.N., Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543–562.
Meador, D., Flege, J.E., & Mackay, I.R.A. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 55–67.
Muench, K.L., & Creel, S.C. (2013). Gradient phonological inconsistency affects vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication.
Munro, M.J., & Dewing, T.M. (1995a). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306.
Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. (1995b). Foreign accent comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.
Nygaard, L.C., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355–376.
Nguyen, N., Dufour, S., & Brunellière, A. (2012). Does imitation facilitate word recognition in a non-native regional accent? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–7.
Schmid, P.M., & Yeni-Komshian, G.H. (1999). The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 56–64.
Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
Sommers, M.S., & Barcroft, J. (2007). An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 231–249.